Thanks - nice to have a full resolution image to take a close look at. Looks pretty nice on my 5K display. Sadly not many images posted here are full resolution.
robert_in_ca wrote:
That's interesting as I didn't sharpen the images at all. I wonder what might be behind the cause of that.
Probably because the one of yours I looked at is full resolution whereas most others posted on FM appear to be 2048px wide so presumably downsampled and then stretched when displayed on a 5k display.
Finally got around to testing the 300 but so far it appears to be no sharper than the 200-600 at 600mm - definitely wouldn't recommend anyone upgrade from the 200-600 hoping to get sharper images.
Certainly it seems to have none of the pop one gets from the 600 f/4.
Here is to hoping there is a dramatic improvement at 420mm because I can't see myself using it much over the 600 f/4.