Jman13 wrote:
A few from this past week when I was out in Seattle and Olympic National Park. I have a LOT more shots to go through, from both my R5 and my Fuji X100V.
These are with the R5, Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8, RF 24-105mm f/4L and RF 70-200mm f/2.8L:
Optically, the Sigma. The Canon handles wonderfully in the field due to its much smaller size, and it's got that extra range, which is also really nice, but the Sigma is better at the edges from about 14-20mm, and has significantly lower distortion. Beyond that, they're pretty much a wash in the rest of the overlapping range.
IndyFab wrote:
Whos the winner the Sig 14-24 or Canon 14-35 ?
stanj wrote:
My favorite owl. Based on your IG posts, you had a great time
They are beautiful Owls. Yes it was a great trip. It was my first since all this crazy stuff started so it was nice to get away and to photography these beauties on top of it. BTW the 400mm f2.8 was a dream lens for the Owls used it at f2.8 almost the entire trip.
