chasdfg
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
|
Fred Miranda wrote:
100%
I don't get tempted as much, except when checking the battery level. I'm wondering if I'd gain much from shooting with the M11-D or using my M10-R with a half case that covers the LCD.
My experience would still be the same: first, I set the ISO (either on the top or back), then the aperture (on the lens), and finally the shutter speed.
I also use the original M-D (currently under repair), which features ISO controls on the back. I think I would prefer it for its simplicity. It’s not compatible with any EVF or WiFi and lacks automatic functions.
I honestly think if you're disciplined about not reviewing pictures with your LCD covered (with the M10R BP, which is such a beautiful camera) and the fact you have your MD, this M11D is superfluous.
I used to have an M10D and the experience was very liberating (as you'd know with your MD), but once I got into the mindset of not reviewing pics or relying on live view, I felt I could apply that to the other cameras I had at that time. When I sold the camera, the biggest thing I missed was the foldable thumbrest. Sometimes I do miss the idea of the camera, but the appeal of the camera diminished from a practical standpoint over time. Now I just use my Nikon ZF with LCD folded on days I want to shoot with the M(10/11)D experience. There's still excitement when I review the pics at the end of the day, though it's always very tempting to flip the LCD round to check during the day. M11D would have a similar temptation though cause of the WiFi implementation, same as the M10D (in that sense the MD is really more "pure" in the film-like shooting sense).
|
