j4nu wrote: fotografur wroteShot identically to see the OOF areas between these two lenses. Cropped in on the 50GM to try and match the closer focusing distance of the 35.
Thoughts? Have a preference?Imho, it's hard to say anything because of compression artifacts (or that's what I think I'm seeing at least ...
I think they are jpeg + forum upload compression artifacts, I think if you put in a link to the original fullsize jpeg they won't be there .
fotografur wrote: j4nu wrotefotografur wroteShot identically to see the OOF areas between these two lenses. Cropped in on the 50GM to try and match the closer focusing distance of the 35.
Thoughts? Have a preference?Imho, it's hard to say anything because of compression artifacts (or that's what I think I'm seeing at least ...What?
I think they are jpeg + forum upload compression artifacts, I think if you put in a link to the original fullsize jpeg they won't be there .
fotografur wrotej4nu wrotefotografur wroteShot identically to see the OOF areas between these two lenses. Cropped in on the 50GM to try and match the closer focusing distance of the 35.
Thoughts? Have a preference?Imho, it's hard to say anything because of compression artifacts (or that's what I think I'm seeing at least ...What?
I just thought you could get an idea of the rendering, focal length and bokeh with these . Otherwise I would have done the RAWS.
I think they are jpeg + forum upload compression artifacts, I think if you put in a link to the original fullsize jpeg they won't be there .
fotografur wrotej4nu wrotefotografur wroteShot identically to see the OOF areas between these two lenses. Cropped in on the 50GM to try and match the closer focusing distance of the 35.
Thoughts? Have a preference?Imho, it's hard to say anything because of compression artifacts (or that's what I think I'm seeing at least ...What?I just thought you could get an idea of the rendering, focal length and bokeh with these . Otherwise I would have done the RAWS.
Yes, that's where these blobs make it difficult to judge the blur/smoothness/transitions/etc.
If those are uploaded to the forum, I think there's a size limit above which the image is recompressed wich can result in such blobs...
I think they are jpeg + forum upload compression artifacts, I think if you put in a link to the original fullsize jpeg they won't be there .
fotografur wrotej4nu wrotefotografur wroteShot identically to see the OOF areas between these two lenses. Cropped in on the 50GM to try and match the closer focusing distance of the 35.
Thoughts? Have a preference?Imho, it's hard to say anything because of compression artifacts (or that's what I think I'm seeing at least ...What?I just thought you could get an idea of the rendering, focal length and bokeh with these . Otherwise I would have done the RAWS.Yes, that's where these blobs make it difficult to judge the blur/smoothness/transitions/etc.
If those are uploaded to the forum, I think there's a size limit above which the image is recompressed wich can result in such blobs...
I can make some comparisons and observations between the two with these shots.
Sorry it wasn’t helpful for you.
The torture tests of doing shallow DoF shots against a high contrast snow/tree background shows the fact that the lens isn't an APO but it loca easily managed and not distracting at all at normal viewing resolutions...even at 100% it wasn't distracting really.
NatDeroxL7 wrote:
The torture tests of doing shallow DoF shots against a high contrast snow/tree background shows the fact that the lens isn't an APO but it loca easily managed and not distracting at all at normal viewing resolutions...even at 100% it wasn't distracting really.
PS: BTW I noticed when I quote a post on my iPad with latest iOS I get a similar problem. I don’t get a similar issue on my M1 Mac mini. Reply seems to work fine though on both M1 and iPad.
While walking on a desert trail in the early morning, I spotted this fallen, rotting old desert tree. The light was hitting it in such a way from inside the hollowed out part that it looked like there was a fire from inside, almost like a vein had come alive.
Would anyone be able to make RAW files available with nice examples of bokeh transition zones? I want to see what I can do with the files in post as some people are saying the bokeh is not as nice as the Sigma 35 f1.2.