cpe1991 wrote:
Canon has posted the MTF curves of the 100-500 on the Japanese website, corrected for diffraction. The values at 500mm are a tad lower than those for the 100-400mm at 400mm, as expected for a lens of very similar IQ but smaller aperture. It seems most likely that the two lens have very similar IQ.
Do you have the link to those MTF curves? I wonder how they compare at 400mm and throughout the zoom range. TIA.
Doug Vann wrote:
I am using Classic Lightroom so there won't be any update....
Do you mean the non-cloud version? Otherwise as noted above LR Classic is a current product and will likely be updated shortly with R5 support.
If you are on the standalone then you've known you won't have future RAW support for years now. That is a choice and nothing to do with the R5. Skip the Starbucks once a month and you can have the latest and greatest LR/PS....
koenkooi wrote:
Updated so regularly that it still doesn't have 'Camera Matching' profiles for the RP and M6II.
It's been well over a year and still no camera matching profiles for any new cameras released in that period except the R. I'm in a thread about this at the Lightroom Queen site. No one is really saying anything. People in forum land are pointing fingers at both Adobe and Canon. Legal issues and/or both Adobe and Canon not communicating for some reason?
This was why I started this thread. I hope the RAW files looks as good after Adobe releases LR/ACR support. By what I've seen so far I could live with Adobe profiles. The new sensor looks pretty good and I think Canon said it would.
RobAmy wrote:
I never used a 5dmark IV but I feel the R5 is better then the 1dx Mark II and Amy agrees with what we have done so far with the R5. The TC's and adapter work great. I do not believe the RF TC with work with the adapter. If using the RF TC then you will have a RF lens to so no need for the adapter. The RF TC will not work with EF lenses. The reason for the change is to migrate everything to RF mount. I leave my IS on all the time.
So the RF adapter will work EF lenses, but the RF- TC wont ?
If so, how bad does it cripple it using a EF lens with EF- TC ?
