This topic is in the 2010 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.
Archive 2010C/Y Zeiss Image Post
p.29 #1C/Y Zeiss Image Post
Just joined the club with a 50/1,7 and a 135/2,8.
1DmkII, 50/1,7 @ 1.7
1DmkII, 50/1,7 @ 2.0
1DmkII, 50/1,7 @ 1.7
 |
||
| http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2533/5818432324_36fb4b4a07_b.jpg | ||
|
1DmkII, 50/1,7 @ 2.0
|
||
| http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2038/5826876617_5ea61df01d_b.jpg | ||
|
Jun 13, 2011 at 08:40 PM
)
p.29 #3C/Y Zeiss Image Post
Matt
Like the 2nd shot and the last one. Nice shot of downtown and Market St.
You should have given us a heads up before you came, so us FM'ers in the SF bay area could have met up with you and bought you a beer.
Like the 2nd shot and the last one. Nice shot of downtown and Market St.
You should have given us a heads up before you came, so us FM'ers in the SF bay area could have met up with you and bought you a beer.
Jun 17, 2011 at 12:40 PM
p.29 #4C/Y Zeiss Image Post
wayne seltzer wrote:
Matt
Like the 2nd shot and the last one. Nice shot of downtown and Market St.
You should have given us a heads up before you came, so us FM'ers in the SF bay area could have met up with you and bought you a beer.
Awww shoot. I had thought of it, but never acted on it. Thanks for the offer, it would have been great to meet some of you guys.
SF is one of my favourite places though, so I will be back for sure at some point. 
Matt
Like the 2nd shot and the last one. Nice shot of downtown and Market St.
You should have given us a heads up before you came, so us FM'ers in the SF bay area could have met up with you and bought you a beer.
Awww shoot. I had thought of it, but never acted on it. Thanks for the offer, it would have been great to meet some of you guys.
SF is one of my favourite places though, so I will be back for sure at some point. Jun 17, 2011 at 12:44 PM
p.29 #7C/Y Zeiss Image Post
John Black wrote:
BNSF Train Yard in Kansas City; Contax 35-135mm Sonnar Vario
Great shot John! That lens has a lovely look to it. Do you know roughly the settings on the lens?
BNSF Train Yard in Kansas City; Contax 35-135mm Sonnar Vario
Great shot John! That lens has a lovely look to it. Do you know roughly the settings on the lens?
Jun 18, 2011 at 02:11 PM
p.29 #8C/Y Zeiss Image Post
CY Zeiss 80-200 f/4 (taken at either f/5.6 or f/8). Dave
http://www.pbase.com/dbehrens/image/135916005/original.jpg
http://www.pbase.com/dbehrens/image/135916005/original.jpg
Jun 26, 2011 at 08:15 PM
p.29 #9C/Y Zeiss Image Post
helimat wrote:
Like the 2nd shot and the last one. Nice shot of downtown and Market St.
You should have given us a heads up before you came, so us FM'ers in the SF bay area could have met up with you and bought you a beer.Awww shoot. I had thought of it, but never acted on it. Thanks for the offer, it would have been great to meet some of you guys. SF is one of my favourite places though, so I will be back for sure at some point.
Yes, it would have been nice to meet up with you in Portland as well :-)
wayne seltzer wrote
MattLike the 2nd shot and the last one. Nice shot of downtown and Market St.
You should have given us a heads up before you came, so us FM'ers in the SF bay area could have met up with you and bought you a beer.
SF is one of my favourite places though, so I will be back for sure at some point. Yes, it would have been nice to meet up with you in Portland as well :-)
Jun 26, 2011 at 08:24 PM
p.29 #10C/Y Zeiss Image Post
helimat wrote:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2470/5825565575_eba20df438_o.jpg
_MG_4566 by helimat, on Flickr
were you in a dream within a dream? i didn't know you could bring cameras in there...
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2470/5825565575_eba20df438_o.jpg
_MG_4566 by helimat, on Flickr
were you in a dream within a dream? i didn't know you could bring cameras in there...
Jun 27, 2011 at 03:55 PM
p.29 #11C/Y Zeiss Image Post
banpreso wrote:
were you in a dream within a dream? i didn't know you could bring cameras in there...
This was also my first thought as I saw this picture. A really nice shot helimat.
Here are two from my C/Y lenses.
Planar 50/1.7
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2561/5857242720_62a398c03c_b.jpg
Vario-Sonnar 100-300, MFD, 300mm, f5.6
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5318/5881247646_479dc938af_b.jpg
were you in a dream within a dream? i didn't know you could bring cameras in there...
This was also my first thought as I saw this picture. A really nice shot helimat.
Here are two from my C/Y lenses.
Planar 50/1.7
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2561/5857242720_62a398c03c_b.jpg
Vario-Sonnar 100-300, MFD, 300mm, f5.6
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5318/5881247646_479dc938af_b.jpg
Jun 29, 2011 at 04:47 AM
p.29 #12C/Y Zeiss Image Post
I have to say that Contax lenses are still the best for 3D as the images in thread clearly show. The last 2 pics of photoe almost jump from the screen.
Jun 29, 2011 at 06:06 AM
p.29 #13C/Y Zeiss Image Post
Carsten - Ahhh... the joys of limited EXIF 40-50mm? F5.6? The 35-135 is very corrected in the 35mm range. Meaning, its verticals are more vertical, less convergence. The images respond very well to the perspective correction added in C1 Version 6.x.
40-50mm? F5.6? The 35-135 is very corrected in the 35mm range. Meaning, its verticals are more vertical, less convergence. The images respond very well to the perspective correction added in C1 Version 6.x. Jun 29, 2011 at 08:11 AM
p.29 #14C/Y Zeiss Image Post
John Black wrote:
Carsten - Ahhh... the joys of limited EXIF 40-50mm? F5.6? The 35-135 is very corrected in the 35mm range. Meaning, its verticals are more vertical, less convergence.
Its verticals are more vertical than what, precisely?
Carsten - Ahhh... the joys of limited EXIF
40-50mm? F5.6? The 35-135 is very corrected in the 35mm range. Meaning, its verticals are more vertical, less convergence. Its verticals are more vertical than what, precisely?
Jul 02, 2011 at 04:34 AM
p.29 #17C/Y Zeiss Image Post
mMontag and mpmendenhall, great shots. Love them.
Stefan
Stefan
Jul 09, 2011 at 03:41 AM
p.29 #18C/Y Zeiss Image Post
It has been a while to post here, great shots everywhere. WoW ! I finally ordered another Leitax mount, once arrived, I will attempt to convert my sleeper Planar 50 1.4 to F mount. Hope it works.....
23rd Stree, NYC all with CY 28/f2.8 , D700
23rd Stree, NYC all with CY 28/f2.8 , D700
Jul 10, 2011 at 05:26 PM
p.29 #19C/Y Zeiss Image Post
Toothwalker wrote:
40-50mm? F5.6? The 35-135 is very corrected in the 35mm range. Meaning, its verticals are more vertical, less convergence.Its verticals are more vertical than what, precisely?
Than the 35 Lux ASPH M and Canon 24-105L.
John Black wrote
Carsten - Ahhh... the joys of limited EXIF 40-50mm? F5.6? The 35-135 is very corrected in the 35mm range. Meaning, its verticals are more vertical, less convergence.Than the 35 Lux ASPH M and Canon 24-105L.
Jul 10, 2011 at 08:19 PM
p.29 #20C/Y Zeiss Image Post
Probably with the Zeiss 35-70
Vancouver5 by Anh Tri, on Flickr
Downtown Vancouver6 by Anh Tri, on Flickr
Mercedes SLK 350 Vancouver7 by Anh Tri, on Flickr
Vancouver5 by Anh Tri, on Flickr
Downtown Vancouver6 by Anh Tri, on Flickr
Mercedes SLK 350 Vancouver7 by Anh Tri, on Flickr
Jul 10, 2011 at 11:26 PM