This topic is in the 2005 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.
Archive 2005Show us your backpack
p.8 #1Show us your backpack
here is my mini-trekker aw, lens, 580ex, and accessories
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v449/mg7726/mini-trekker.jpg
lightweight travel means losing the 70-200 IS lens
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v449/mg7726/mini-trekker.jpg
lightweight travel means losing the 70-200 IS lens
Mar 21, 2005 at 07:03 PM
p.8 #2Show us your backpack
lehb wrote:
I notice a good 99% of people use Lowepro Mini Trekker and one with a Tamrac Expedition 4, is there a reason for that? I have a Lowepro Mini Trekker Classic right now and thinking of an up grade to either a Lowepro Mini Trekker AW or the Tamrac Expedition 4 but can not decide. I bough the Lowepro because at the time the local shop only carry the Lowepro. Anyone with pros and cons on either one?
Thanks
Le
Guess that lone Expedition 4 owner is me?
I looked at the Lowepro's, and while they looked very nice, the dividers specifically from the Expedition just seemed more sturdy, and looked like they would provide more protection.
I also wanted a backpack on the smaller side, and the Expedition 4 fit.
Expedition also provides these bumps on the back of the backpack, to allow air to flow and keep your back from getting sweaty. I really like this feature.
So far, after a couple of months, I'm very satisfied.
I notice a good 99% of people use Lowepro Mini Trekker and one with a Tamrac Expedition 4, is there a reason for that? I have a Lowepro Mini Trekker Classic right now and thinking of an up grade to either a Lowepro Mini Trekker AW or the Tamrac Expedition 4 but can not decide. I bough the Lowepro because at the time the local shop only carry the Lowepro. Anyone with pros and cons on either one?
Thanks
Le
Guess that lone Expedition 4 owner is me?
I looked at the Lowepro's, and while they looked very nice, the dividers specifically from the Expedition just seemed more sturdy, and looked like they would provide more protection.
I also wanted a backpack on the smaller side, and the Expedition 4 fit.
Expedition also provides these bumps on the back of the backpack, to allow air to flow and keep your back from getting sweaty. I really like this feature.
So far, after a couple of months, I'm very satisfied.
Mar 21, 2005 at 07:14 PM
jtorral
Offline
Activity
[X]
Details
p.8 #3Show us your backpack
for some reason the first post was messed up. her eit is again
clockwise starting at the top left.
Zeiss 21mm 2.8, Leica MP with a 35mm 2.0 Asph, Zeiss 28mm 2.0, 1DSII with a Zeiss 35-70mm 3.4, Zeiss 50mm 1.4, Zeiss 100mm 2.0 and some junk.
clockwise starting at the top left.
Zeiss 21mm 2.8, Leica MP with a 35mm 2.0 Asph, Zeiss 28mm 2.0, 1DSII with a Zeiss 35-70mm 3.4, Zeiss 50mm 1.4, Zeiss 100mm 2.0 and some junk.
Mar 21, 2005 at 07:17 PM
p.8 #4Show us your backpack
chris78cpr wrote:
What is the tripod foot on that 300F4LIS
Chris
That looks like a Really Right Stuff or Kirk lens plate for the Arca Swiss system. Read about it at www.reallyrightstuff.com for an introduction to the system. You'll never use another tripod mounting system again.....
What is the tripod foot on that 300F4LIS
Chris
That looks like a Really Right Stuff or Kirk lens plate for the Arca Swiss system. Read about it at www.reallyrightstuff.com for an introduction to the system. You'll never use another tripod mounting system again.....
Mar 21, 2005 at 09:13 PM
p.8 #5Show us your backpack
chris78cpr wrote:
Here is my lowepro mini trekker, I like the weight of this bag a mere 2.8lbs. With all the equipment it weighs 16lbs, very easy to carry around
http://ailab3.engr.uconn.edu/~noriravi/uploaded/cameraBag.jpg
NoriWhat is the tripod foot on that 300F4LIS
Chris
It is a Krik lens plate I for 100-400, fits the 300 f/4 IS very well
Nori wrote
Interesting too see how others have organized their equipment.Here is my lowepro mini trekker, I like the weight of this bag a mere 2.8lbs. With all the equipment it weighs 16lbs, very easy to carry around
http://ailab3.engr.uconn.edu/~noriravi/uploaded/cameraBag.jpg
Nori
Chris
It is a Krik lens plate I for 100-400, fits the 300 f/4 IS very well
Mar 21, 2005 at 09:49 PM
p.8 #6Show us your backpack
What, only 13 pages of back pack postings?
I have the number 184681 memorized. It's the FM e-mail ID for the back pack thread!
I have the number 184681 memorized. It's the FM e-mail ID for the back pack thread!
Mar 21, 2005 at 09:54 PM
p.8 #7Show us your backpack
RoyPertchi wrote:
What, only 13 pages of back pack postings?
I have the number 184681 memorized. It's the FM e-mail ID for the back pack thread!
I have it memoried too. I am really enjoying this thread since I also get to see all the things in the bags I am going to ask Santa for! I love those toys
What, only 13 pages of back pack postings?
I have the number 184681 memorized. It's the FM e-mail ID for the back pack thread!
I have it memoried too. I am really enjoying this thread since I also get to see all the things in the bags I am going to ask Santa for! I love those toys
Mar 21, 2005 at 10:12 PM
p.8 #8Show us your backpack
Those of you who own a Crumpler Schrinkle or Brian's Hot Tub, or a LowePro CompuTrekker, have you tried bringing it on a plane with you yet? How are they when fully loaded (gear + laptop)? Do they carry-on fine? I'm looking seriously at a BHT but it looks like it's close to being too large to qualify as a carry-on. Has anyone had any problems with this?
Mar 22, 2005 at 01:40 AM
p.8 #9Show us your backpack
speedydave wrote:
Those of you who own a Crumpler Schrinkle or Brian's Hot Tub, or a LowePro CompuTrekker, have you tried bringing it on a plane with you yet? How are they when fully loaded (gear + laptop)? Do they carry-on fine? I'm looking seriously at a BHT but it looks like it's close to being too large to qualify as a carry-on. Has anyone had any problems with this?
I just got a Schrinkle (as in yesterday), but it looks like it will carry on easily, it's just a bit bigger than a mini-Trekker.
Those of you who own a Crumpler Schrinkle or Brian's Hot Tub, or a LowePro CompuTrekker, have you tried bringing it on a plane with you yet? How are they when fully loaded (gear + laptop)? Do they carry-on fine? I'm looking seriously at a BHT but it looks like it's close to being too large to qualify as a carry-on. Has anyone had any problems with this?
I just got a Schrinkle (as in yesterday), but it looks like it will carry on easily, it's just a bit bigger than a mini-Trekker.
Mar 22, 2005 at 05:33 AM
p.8 #10Show us your backpack
Here's my contribution
First is my Tamrac Expedition 5. This is a really tough and comfortable backpack which will take most of my kit and a laptop for long jouneys. Very happy with this bag althoug the new version has better tripod straps and a paddded laptop pocket.
http://www.pbase.com/timandcaz/image/41120818/original.jpg
Second is my little Tamrac bag / waist pack. This is great as it is a very versatile and tough bag. It works great as a regular camera bag for short trips and holidays and doubles up as a comfortable waist pack with an in-built belt hidden in the back. This is the bag I use the most. Physically small but a bit of a tardis inside. Check out the kit I keep in there with room to spare!
http://www.pbase.com/timandcaz/image/41120824/original.jpg
Tim
First is my Tamrac Expedition 5. This is a really tough and comfortable backpack which will take most of my kit and a laptop for long jouneys. Very happy with this bag althoug the new version has better tripod straps and a paddded laptop pocket.
http://www.pbase.com/timandcaz/image/41120818/original.jpg
Second is my little Tamrac bag / waist pack. This is great as it is a very versatile and tough bag. It works great as a regular camera bag for short trips and holidays and doubles up as a comfortable waist pack with an in-built belt hidden in the back. This is the bag I use the most. Physically small but a bit of a tardis inside. Check out the kit I keep in there with room to spare!
http://www.pbase.com/timandcaz/image/41120824/original.jpg
Tim
Mar 22, 2005 at 03:26 PM
p.8 #11Show us your backpack
This is my "essentials" kit....It's a Crumpler Schrinkle bag, 1dsMk2, 16-35/2.8 L, Contax 35-70/3.4 (especially while the 24-70/2.8 L is getting repaired), and 70-200/2.8 IS. It carries the 1.4 TC, a 420EX, remote release, and Lee Filter system as well.
I just got this bag, I think it will be a keeper. I'll try to get photos of the "loaded for bear" bag (one of the big Lowe bags), with 2 camera bodies and all the prime lenses in it at some point.
I just got this bag, I think it will be a keeper. I'll try to get photos of the "loaded for bear" bag (one of the big Lowe bags), with 2 camera bodies and all the prime lenses in it at some point.
Mar 23, 2005 at 12:24 PM
p.8 #12Show us your backpack
I love this thread (mostly just tagging it btw). I currently have the Velocity 7, which is great for walk around bag (small, easy to carry) but starts to hurt the shoulder while hiking. This thread has been great for me to figure out a better hiking backpack!
Mar 23, 2005 at 01:06 PM
p.8 #13Show us your backpack
toonhorse wrote:
I love this thread (mostly just tagging it btw). I currently have the Velocity 7, which is great for walk around bag (small, easy to carry) but starts to hurt the shoulder while hiking. This thread has been great for me to figure out a better hiking backpack!
When selecting a backpack, you should weigh all your equipment, then add the weight of the backpack, and take a look at your total. You'll suddenly understand why that backpack is hurting your shoulders.
My kit, without the bigma, comes in at 9 pounds. Add a laptop, or a tripod, and a 4 pound pack, and suddenly your are carrying more than you think.
I love this thread (mostly just tagging it btw). I currently have the Velocity 7, which is great for walk around bag (small, easy to carry) but starts to hurt the shoulder while hiking. This thread has been great for me to figure out a better hiking backpack!
When selecting a backpack, you should weigh all your equipment, then add the weight of the backpack, and take a look at your total. You'll suddenly understand why that backpack is hurting your shoulders.
My kit, without the bigma, comes in at 9 pounds. Add a laptop, or a tripod, and a 4 pound pack, and suddenly your are carrying more than you think.
Mar 23, 2005 at 01:20 PM
p.8 #14Show us your backpack
Very good advice Matt. I think what happened was that I grew out of it so to speak. I only had a 650, the 28-135, and the 70-210 a year ago when I got the pack. It was a nice pack because I could swing it around to the front to take the camera out (without taking the pack off at all). But now, with a 20D, 28-135, 70-210, 18-55, and 35-70 (for macro work) in there, it is much heavier.
Mar 23, 2005 at 01:28 PM
p.8 #15Show us your backpack
What is a good shoulder bag to fit the following setup. I already have the Offtrail 2 but a little small, the Micro 200 is not convenient being a backpack.
Canon 20D, no grip
Canon 17-40 f4
Canon 50 f1.4
Canon 135 f2
Canon 1.4x ext
Canon 580ex
epson p2000, 4 batteries, 3 filters
Basically, I need a bag for indoor social events. May I see what photo journalists use?
Canon 20D, no grip
Canon 17-40 f4
Canon 50 f1.4
Canon 135 f2
Canon 1.4x ext
Canon 580ex
epson p2000, 4 batteries, 3 filters
Basically, I need a bag for indoor social events. May I see what photo journalists use?
Mar 23, 2005 at 02:00 PM
p.8 #16Show us your backpack
phase wrote:
Here's my contribution
First is my Tamrac Expedition 5. This is a really tough and comfortable backpack which will take most of my kit and a laptop for long jouneys. Very happy with this bag althoug the new version has better tripod straps and a paddded laptop pocket.
Tim
Looking at the new Tamrac Expedition 5, it does not mention any storage for a notebook and it also does not come up in there computer compatible search. I am looking at the 5575 and 5275 model. Am I looking at the wrong product?
Also does it come with any weather cover?
Here's my contribution
First is my Tamrac Expedition 5. This is a really tough and comfortable backpack which will take most of my kit and a laptop for long jouneys. Very happy with this bag althoug the new version has better tripod straps and a paddded laptop pocket.
Tim
Looking at the new Tamrac Expedition 5, it does not mention any storage for a notebook and it also does not come up in there computer compatible search. I am looking at the 5575 and 5275 model. Am I looking at the wrong product?
Also does it come with any weather cover?
Mar 24, 2005 at 06:58 PM
p.8 #17Show us your backpack
I have Brian's Hot Tub ... filled it with gear and a laptop for a ski trip to Colorado a couple of weeks ago ... fit in the big jets just fine ... slips into the overhead with no probs ... puddle jumper up the hill ... different story though those planes get jammed with ski gear anyhow so it was no big deal to find a spot. Have to say that it's a tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight fit for a larger laptop ... i have a Toshiba Satellite A75 and it barely fits. Really stresses the zippers. The hot tub really looks bigger than it is ... it's real sturdy though ... I love it... use it for plane travel ...
Mar 24, 2005 at 07:44 PM
p.8 #19Show us your backpack
I am almost reluctant to show my bag, since I have only had my DSLR for a few days.
Here is my bag with the labels for the gear I will purchase within the next 2 months.
Here is my bag with the labels for the gear I will purchase within the next 2 months.
Mar 26, 2005 at 12:34 AM
p.8 #20Show us your backpack
Sorry...temporarily stuck on a dialup line so downloads are excruciatingly slow!
Anyone combine a 17" laptop with their camera gear? If so, what do you use?
Regards,
cbres00
Anyone combine a 17" laptop with their camera gear? If so, what do you use?
Regards,
cbres00
Mar 26, 2005 at 01:24 AM