AndereObjektiv
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
|
zhangyue wrote:
You are welcome. 907 looks so nice, I only wish it had flip LCD to do waist level shooting. This is so nature and important for Hasselblad users that I am disappointed to see it miss.
Ah, but it does flip up: 
https://www.hasselblad.com/press/media-library/
Alas, not down for high tripod use.
For any FF system, even I know diffraction happen around f5.6 to f10 depend on pixel size, I personally will not hesitate to use up to f13 if I have to. Sharpening can compensate some detail loss.
As Ocean replied, other than AF, S glasses were great on S1x. I almost never use AF on SL2 anyway. S glasses have real focus ring that feel so nice for manual focus because high performance and f2-f2.5 aperture, the peaking works better than M glasses and you keep the focus WO at any shooting aperture which is a big plus. With M, I tend to do focus WO or close to WO and then stop down shooting, that is extra step.
As for FP, after this trip, I decide IBIS is an important feature now I rely on. A few night I brought SL2 and M out, I find I tend to use SL more because it has much wide shooting envelop than M. Images come out of it is really sharp, I can do 1/4S with 90 APO. SL2’s IBIS is really working, again thank to Panasonic. With 6 bit M, this is a blast in field.
...Show more →
I did not mean to imply you did not know about diffraction. This is a misunderstanding, apologies. Only an observation of the physics of aberrations on the wide end and diffraction on the narrow end of the aperture, chasing the sharpest image. It occurs to me that the spatial resolution in high resolution mode of this 47.5mp sensor is around 233 lp/mm, about f/6.3 on an ideal lens, no accident either. I too will not shy away from higher f/ stops, and also use diffraction mitigation sharpening.
Great news about s glass, thanks as well.
I begin to understand the tradeoff between hyperfocal distance and lens FoV. I would like an otus 40ish as a compromise between aperture/diffraction sweetspot and hyperfocal distance. It's probably why I very much like the overall image impression of the 35, 40 and 50 medium format lenses from schneider and rodenstock regardless of mp density.
Also I think the 47.5mp sensor is from sony and shared among the s1r, sl2, z7, d850, q2. All with different sensor glass stacks, different processing pipelines, circuitry, color science, raw engines etc. Lots of differences. But the same base sensor. PDAF takes 1.8mp.
|
fuji
it was written off on my list before due to no flip LCD.