Nikon Z Images Thread
p.107 #1Nikon Z Images Thread
Nikon Z 6
NIKKOR Z 14-30mm f/4 S
ƒ/10.0
14.0 mm
1/125
ISO 400
9-19-20b by dennis laska, on FlickrSep 20, 2020 at 05:13 PM
p.107 #5Nikon Z Images Thread
Columbus Gardens Housing | 1952 | Hoboken, NJNikon Z7 | Leica 75mm APO Summicron
Sep 21, 2020 at 07:29 PM
p.107 #6Nikon Z Images Thread
Hudson River ParkNikon Z7 | Voigtlander VM 40mm 1.2
Sep 21, 2020 at 07:31 PM
p.107 #9Nikon Z Images Thread
Nikon Z6 + Voigtlander 40mm f1.2
Shelter Island
Fire Island
Long Island
Shelter Island
Fire Island
Long Island
Sep 23, 2020 at 02:04 PM
p.107 #10Nikon Z Images Thread
Geese Fly By
Nikon Z 6
NIKKOR Z 14-30mm f/4 S
ƒ/10.0
14.0 mm
1/125
ISO 140
9-23-20FBa by dennis laska, on Flickr
Nikon Z 6
NIKKOR Z 14-30mm f/4 S
ƒ/10.0
14.0 mm
1/125
ISO 140
9-23-20FBa by dennis laska, on FlickrSep 24, 2020 at 05:45 AM
|
p.107 #11Nikon Z Images Thread
now that can't be the 14-30/4. too many limitations by some opinions 
Sep 24, 2020 at 06:01 AM
p.107 #13Nikon Z Images Thread
From my first outing with my new Z7 and lenses. I was shooting Fuji X bodies the previous 3 years.
Z7 and 20mm F/1.8S
Joshua Tree at White Tank by Ryan Luna, on Flickr
Z7 and 20mm F/1.8S
Joshua Tree at White Tank by Ryan Luna, on FlickrSep 24, 2020 at 01:22 PM
p.107 #14Nikon Z Images Thread
Saint-Quentin Basilica, France
Built from the end of the 12th to the end of the 15th century,
Built from the end of the 12th to the end of the 15th century,
 |
||
 |
||
 |
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
Sep 24, 2020 at 01:55 PM
p.107 #15Nikon Z Images Thread
z6 with the new 70-200S and 1.4tc
© Al Powers, Powers Imagery LLC
© Al Powers, Powers Imagery LLC
© Al Powers, Powers Imagery LLC
© Al Powers, Powers Imagery LLC
Sep 24, 2020 at 02:45 PM
p.107 #16Nikon Z Images Thread
Here are several hand held panos of Northern Ontario's changing fall colours (early days), captured with the Nikon Z6 and Nikkor Z 24-70mm f4S. Close inspection reveals the incredible detail rendered by this gem of a lens...
And so it Begins... by David Hamments, on Flickr
Fall Panorama at Hullett Marsh by David Hamments, on Flickr
Cheers and good light,
David
And so it Begins... by David Hamments, on FlickrFall Panorama at Hullett Marsh by David Hamments, on FlickrCheers and good light,
David
Sep 25, 2020 at 05:08 AM
p.107 #18Nikon Z Images Thread
Chris Dees wrote:
Saint-Quentin Basilica, France
Built from the end of the 12th to the end of the 15th century,
Thanks Chris. Very nice!
I was on my local dealer’s list for the 24-200 when it was released but with no travel planned this year I decided to pass for now.
These photos reaffirm its place on my wish list! Not sure until I get one if there is a reason to keep my 24-70 f4 - your thoughts?
Saint-Quentin Basilica, France
Built from the end of the 12th to the end of the 15th century,
Thanks Chris. Very nice!
I was on my local dealer’s list for the 24-200 when it was released but with no travel planned this year I decided to pass for now.
These photos reaffirm its place on my wish list! Not sure until I get one if there is a reason to keep my 24-70 f4 - your thoughts?
Sep 25, 2020 at 08:32 AM
p.107 #19Nikon Z Images Thread
pwschladen wrote:
Built from the end of the 12th to the end of the 15th century,Thanks Chris. Very nice!
I was on my local dealer’s list for the 24-200 when it was released but with no travel planned this year I decided to pass for now.
These photos reaffirm its place on my wish list! Not sure until I get one if there is a reason to keep my 24-70 f4 - your thoughts?
Thanks Paul.
For me there's no reason to keep the 24-70/4S around. Although its IQ is a little better, the extended reach is much more important for me. If I really want/need the IQ, I'll use the 1.8 primes.
There's a YT-video comparison from Nikon Ricci and there's a review coming up from Thom Hogan.
BTW the images on my iMac look much sharper then these on FM.
Chris Dees wrote
Saint-Quentin Basilica, FranceBuilt from the end of the 12th to the end of the 15th century,
I was on my local dealer’s list for the 24-200 when it was released but with no travel planned this year I decided to pass for now.
These photos reaffirm its place on my wish list! Not sure until I get one if there is a reason to keep my 24-70 f4 - your thoughts?
Thanks Paul.
For me there's no reason to keep the 24-70/4S around. Although its IQ is a little better, the extended reach is much more important for me. If I really want/need the IQ, I'll use the 1.8 primes.
There's a YT-video comparison from Nikon Ricci and there's a review coming up from Thom Hogan.
BTW the images on my iMac look much sharper then these on FM.
Sep 25, 2020 at 01:03 PM
p.107 #20Nikon Z Images Thread
Chris Dees wrote:
Built from the end of the 12th to the end of the 15th century,Thanks Chris. Very nice!
I was on my local dealer’s list for the 24-200 when it was released but with no travel planned this year I decided to pass for now.
These photos reaffirm its place on my wish list! Not sure until I get one if there is a reason to keep my 24-70 f4 - your thoughts?Thanks Paul.
For me there's no reason to keep the 24-70/4S around. Although its IQ is a little better, the extended reach is much more important for me. If I really want/need the IQ, I'll use the 1.8 primes.
There's a YT-video comparison from Nikon Ricci and there's a review coming up from Thom Hogan.
BTW the images on my iMac look much sharper then these on FM.
Thanks again Chris. Glad to hear from someone who has used both the 24-200 and 24-70 f4 that owning the former makes the latter largely redundant. The only 1.8 I own is the 50 S and figure that lens and my 14-30 would make a great travel kit with the 24-200 and my Z7. I owned the much maligned 28-300 twice and found it very useful but always wished it started at 24 rather than 28 even if it meant give up some reach. I assumed that your photos look much better without FM’s resizing and compression.
Patrick
pwschladen wrote
Chris Dees wrote
Saint-Quentin Basilica, FranceBuilt from the end of the 12th to the end of the 15th century,
I was on my local dealer’s list for the 24-200 when it was released but with no travel planned this year I decided to pass for now.
These photos reaffirm its place on my wish list! Not sure until I get one if there is a reason to keep my 24-70 f4 - your thoughts?
For me there's no reason to keep the 24-70/4S around. Although its IQ is a little better, the extended reach is much more important for me. If I really want/need the IQ, I'll use the 1.8 primes.
There's a YT-video comparison from Nikon Ricci and there's a review coming up from Thom Hogan.
BTW the images on my iMac look much sharper then these on FM.
Thanks again Chris. Glad to hear from someone who has used both the 24-200 and 24-70 f4 that owning the former makes the latter largely redundant. The only 1.8 I own is the 50 S and figure that lens and my 14-30 would make a great travel kit with the 24-200 and my Z7. I owned the much maligned 28-300 twice and found it very useful but always wished it started at 24 rather than 28 even if it meant give up some reach. I assumed that your photos look much better without FM’s resizing and compression.
Patrick
Sep 25, 2020 at 06:07 PM