This topic is in the 2014 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.
Archive 2014Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
p.13 #1Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
Light was overcast and dreary
Out the window of a car gull practice
5DMIII
Tamron 150-600
1st image opened in ACR, zero out ALL presets of sharpening and ALL noise reduction 100% crop
2nd image my general work up
Karl
Image shot by Al Freeman he wanted to try my lens 100% crop
general workup in Photoshop
Wind blowing 20mph, blowing snow at a good distance
Same light as gull or worse
Out the window of a car gull practice
5DMIII
Tamron 150-600
1st image opened in ACR, zero out ALL presets of sharpening and ALL noise reduction 100% crop
2nd image my general work up
Karl
Image shot by Al Freeman he wanted to try my lens 100% crop
 |
||
 |
||
|
general workup in Photoshop
 |
||
 |
||
|
Wind blowing 20mph, blowing snow at a good distance
 |
||
 |
||
 |
Same light as gull or worse
Jan 20, 2014 at 09:57 PM
p.13 #2Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
Karl Witt wrote:
Light was overcast and dreary
Out the window of a car gull practice
5DMIII
Tamron 150-600
1st image opened in ACR, zero out ALL presets of sharpening and ALL noise reduction 100% crop
2nd image my general work up
Karl
Thanks for braving the Polar Vortex to get these Karl.
IQ looks good SOOC in #1 at 500mm and f/6.3 (wide open)... your work-up Karl brought out nice sharp eye detail and is very encouraging to see. Well done.
The Lighthouse also looks good at 400mm, and the BCNH's look about how I would expect at that distance.
How was focus acquisition and tracking on the seagull in those poor light conditions?
Am I seeing some slight vignetting in 3 and 4?
Other impressions?
Thanks, Kirk
Light was overcast and dreary
Out the window of a car gull practice
5DMIII
Tamron 150-600
1st image opened in ACR, zero out ALL presets of sharpening and ALL noise reduction 100% crop
2nd image my general work up
Karl
Thanks for braving the Polar Vortex to get these Karl.
IQ looks good SOOC in #1 at 500mm and f/6.3 (wide open)... your work-up Karl brought out nice sharp eye detail and is very encouraging to see. Well done.
The Lighthouse also looks good at 400mm, and the BCNH's look about how I would expect at that distance.
How was focus acquisition and tracking on the seagull in those poor light conditions?
Am I seeing some slight vignetting in 3 and 4?
Other impressions?
Thanks, Kirk
Jan 20, 2014 at 11:33 PM
p.13 #3Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
KirkB wrote:
Out the window of a car gull practice
5DMIII
Tamron 150-600
1st image opened in ACR, zero out ALL presets of sharpening and ALL noise reduction 100% crop
2nd image my general work up
KarlThanks for braving the Polar Vortex to get these Karl.
IQ looks good SOOC in #1 at 500mm and f/6.3 (wide open)... your work-up Karl brought out nice sharp eye detail and is very encouraging to see. Well done.
The Lighthouse also looks good at 400mm, and the BCNH's look about how I would expect at that distance.
How was focus acquisition and tracking on the seagull in those poor light conditions?
Am I seeing some slight vignetting in 3 and 4?
Other impressions?
Thanks, Kirk
I don't have any data in good light Kirk to compare AF in this poor light. Low contrast is simply a challenge with any lens to get good focus lock and tracking but it worked.
Yes on some vignetting, however any camera body with the 'light optimizer' will likely null that out as I remember my 6D body doing a nice job of it when I had it.
I don't expect to have any solid impressions until I have some consistency in light and subject matter to experiment. It is like testing a race car on a wet surface and trying to analyze how it will perform under the right conditions. Only had a few brief moments of sun with no subjects to enjoy unfortunately.
The lighthouse at distance had a lot of blowing snow particles and there was water spray from behind, the sky and gradients in it were moody and uneven.
Lots to learn yet and I'm willing to take the time and discipline to get them in order...........
Karl
Would like to thank Al for the quick shoot here trying to keep all things equal.
In this case Tamron appears as the sharper of the two images
Karl Witt wrote
Light was overcast and drearyOut the window of a car gull practice
5DMIII
Tamron 150-600
1st image opened in ACR, zero out ALL presets of sharpening and ALL noise reduction 100% crop
2nd image my general work up
Karl
IQ looks good SOOC in #1 at 500mm and f/6.3 (wide open)... your work-up Karl brought out nice sharp eye detail and is very encouraging to see. Well done.
The Lighthouse also looks good at 400mm, and the BCNH's look about how I would expect at that distance.
How was focus acquisition and tracking on the seagull in those poor light conditions?
Am I seeing some slight vignetting in 3 and 4?
Other impressions?
Thanks, Kirk
I don't have any data in good light Kirk to compare AF in this poor light. Low contrast is simply a challenge with any lens to get good focus lock and tracking but it worked.
Yes on some vignetting, however any camera body with the 'light optimizer' will likely null that out as I remember my 6D body doing a nice job of it when I had it.
I don't expect to have any solid impressions until I have some consistency in light and subject matter to experiment. It is like testing a race car on a wet surface and trying to analyze how it will perform under the right conditions. Only had a few brief moments of sun with no subjects to enjoy unfortunately.
The lighthouse at distance had a lot of blowing snow particles and there was water spray from behind, the sky and gradients in it were moody and uneven.
Lots to learn yet and I'm willing to take the time and discipline to get them in order...........
Karl
Would like to thank Al for the quick shoot here trying to keep all things equal.
In this case Tamron appears as the sharper of the two images
Jan 20, 2014 at 11:49 PM
p.13 #4Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
Lots to learn yet and I'm willing to take the time and discipline to get them in order........... +1
Anxious to see the images that will come in the next few weeks as weather gets better and good light is available more often.
We have plenty of sun here in SoCal already, but as a Nikon shooter I will have to wait a couple of months until that version is released.
Keep the images coming as often as you can Karl... we all appreciate it.
Kirk
Anxious to see the images that will come in the next few weeks as weather gets better and good light is available more often.
We have plenty of sun here in SoCal already, but as a Nikon shooter I will have to wait a couple of months until that version is released.
Keep the images coming as often as you can Karl... we all appreciate it.
Kirk
Jan 21, 2014 at 12:40 AM
p.13 #5Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
Don't forget to post your review here:
https://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/517
Fred
https://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/517
Fred
Jan 21, 2014 at 02:52 AM
p.13 #6Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
I have yet to use the lens under sunny conditions. In low light, it will sometimes not focus at all when it is wide open (not even hunting). I have to back it down to about 400mm before it will lock on to anything. Then, it's fine when I open it up again. I never had this problem with my Bigma, or Canon 400mm 5.6L.
Jan 21, 2014 at 05:05 AM
p.13 #7Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
spmills wrote:
I have yet to use the lens under sunny conditions. In low light, it will sometimes not focus at all when it is wide open (not even hunting). I have to back it down to about 400mm before it will lock on to anything. Then, it's fine when I open it up again. I never had this problem with my Bigma, or Canon 400mm 5.6L.
Which camera body are you using?
Roger
I have yet to use the lens under sunny conditions. In low light, it will sometimes not focus at all when it is wide open (not even hunting). I have to back it down to about 400mm before it will lock on to anything. Then, it's fine when I open it up again. I never had this problem with my Bigma, or Canon 400mm 5.6L.
Which camera body are you using?
Roger
Jan 21, 2014 at 05:11 AM
p.13 #8Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
It happens with my 5D Mk III and my 70D.
Jan 21, 2014 at 05:55 AM
p.13 #9Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
spmills wrote:
It happens with my 5D Mk III and my 70D.
Check your AF settings-
"Lens drive when AF impossible" should be set to ON.
It happens with my 5D Mk III and my 70D.
Check your AF settings-
"Lens drive when AF impossible" should be set to ON.
Jan 21, 2014 at 06:06 AM
p.13 #10Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
Thanks! I'll try that when I get home.
Jan 21, 2014 at 07:10 AM
p.13 #11Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
I'm excited! UPS tracking has my lens as "Out for delivery"!
Jan 21, 2014 at 08:29 AM
p.13 #12Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
big country,
Calling dibs when you are done reviewing that Tamron... I'm sold.. and want one now.. I want to try this bad boy out on motorcycle tracks.
really.. let me know when you are done with it.
/r
Andy
Calling dibs when you are done reviewing that Tamron... I'm sold.. and want one now.. I want to try this bad boy out on motorcycle tracks.
really.. let me know when you are done with it.
/r
Andy
Jan 21, 2014 at 08:33 AM
p.13 #13Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
My lens was there when I got home yesterday. After dinner, set up in house and took photos of a $20 bill from 24', focussing with LiveView. Also with 100-400 and 1.4X III and 400 5.6 with 1.4X III. I can see that at 600mm f/7.1 improves over f/6.3, and f/8 even more. So if light allows, f/8 looks really good.
It may be Friday before I get a chance to review photos, but if Friday is a nice day, I will probably choose to take the lens out on my kayak on a local bayou over staying home to review the $20 photos.
So far, it looks like a keeper. Will probably be selling my 400 5.6 to fund it.
Steve
It may be Friday before I get a chance to review photos, but if Friday is a nice day, I will probably choose to take the lens out on my kayak on a local bayou over staying home to review the $20 photos.
So far, it looks like a keeper. Will probably be selling my 400 5.6 to fund it.
Steve
Jan 21, 2014 at 09:07 AM
p.13 #14Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
I took mine to the Sacramento NWR to try it out yesterday with my 5D3.
Tamron test 19 by lennycarl08, on Flickr
Crop
Tamron test 20 by lennycarl08, on Flickr
Tamron test 19 by lennycarl08, on Flickr
Crop
Tamron test 20 by lennycarl08, on Flickr
Jan 21, 2014 at 11:28 AM
p.13 #15Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
Karl Witt wrote:
Light was overcast and dreary
...
Karl
Is that the Lorain lighthouse, Karl?
Nice pictures, BTW.
Light was overcast and dreary
...
Karl
Is that the Lorain lighthouse, Karl?
Nice pictures, BTW.
Jan 21, 2014 at 02:58 PM
p.13 #16Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
Nice shot , at 1st I thought on a crop camera , I tried the exif , then realized you cropped it
Jan 21, 2014 at 03:37 PM
p.13 #17Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
That was the issue. Thanks so much!
Jan 21, 2014 at 08:42 PM
p.13 #18Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
Tom_W wrote:
...
KarlIs that the Lorain lighthouse, Karl?
Nice pictures, BTW.
yes it is Tom
Karl Witt wrote
Light was overcast and dreary...
Karl
Nice pictures, BTW.
yes it is Tom
Jan 21, 2014 at 08:50 PM
p.13 #19Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
I was kind'a expecting my canon mount 150-600mm today, judging from past experances with B&H shipping. I was sorely disapointed when I checked my tracking # to tonght the 21st. to find that it Departed NY the 18th at 2:50am. It said the next report would be Tuesday the 21st. I thought it probably meant I'd have it tuesday. I checked tonight Tuesday the 21st.and my lens has made it from NY, all the way across the lakes to Hodgkins ILL just out side Chicago. UPS must have walked it over. Now it looks like it's just in time for the big snow storm up there so I don't have any idea when I'll get it. Argggg! guess I can look at everybodies samples and test with envy.
Jan 21, 2014 at 11:45 PM
p.13 #20Early Adopters - Tamron 150-600mm
I share your pain, my lens went from NJ and then to Chicago for 3 days.....
It should eventually ship out internationally in NJ, makes no sense at all.
Roger
It should eventually ship out internationally in NJ, makes no sense at all.
Roger
Jan 22, 2014 at 12:45 AM