naturephoto1 wrote:
I pretty much increase the vibrance, contrast, and the saturation with my Minolta CLE 40mm f2 M-Rokkor, Leica R, and Contax (C/Y) 21mm f2.8 Zeiss Distagon lenses for my RAW A7r files. I almost always crank then up to close to what you have indicated.
Rich
My Zeiss C/Y,ZE/ZF and Rollei HFT lenses don't require that much tweaking to get comparable results.Usually only a touch (5-10%) of vibrance and clarity,no saturation and no contrast cranking up.The 16-70/4 needs to be PPed significantly more than all other Zeisses I have.Just like lenses of other brands with lower IQ.
Peire wrote:
My Zeiss C/Y,ZE/ZF and Rollei HFT lenses don't require that much tweaking to get comparable results.Usually only a touch (5-10%) of vibrance and clarity,no saturation and no contrast cranking up.The 16-70/4 needs to be PPed significantly more than all other Zeisses I have.Just like lenses of other brands with lower IQ.
Peire,
I need to increase my settings a little more with my Contax (C/Y) 21mm f2.8 Zeiss Distagon than my Leica R lenses and I believe a little more than my Minolta CLE MC 40mm f2 M-Rokkor lens.
Long time since I posted here but also quite some time since I used my A7r. A forrest quartet from tonight. First and last with the Zeiss ZE 85/1.4 Planar and the middle two with the Zeiss ZE 35/1.4 Distagon.
I was not setup for this shot, but the BMW was coming so I whipped up the camera and snapped it. After some work, it turned out to be not bad. Sony/Zeiss 24mm ZA.
Very nice images, Mike and Pinhole...
Some from today with A7 and Leica Summilux R 80..all wide open, with minimal PP and NO sharpening, except the SOOC jpg sharpening
Gregg
