Sony FE Images Thread
p.2455 #3Sony FE Images Thread
rji2goleez wrote:
More scenes from Palma de Mallorca
Bob -- Beautiful shots!
That seems like just about the perfect travel kit to me, 12-24G and 24-70GM.
More scenes from Palma de Mallorca
Bob -- Beautiful shots!
That seems like just about the perfect travel kit to me, 12-24G and 24-70GM.
Oct 04, 2017 at 08:43 AM
p.2455 #4Sony FE Images Thread
Gunzorro wrote:
Bob -- Beautiful shots!
That seems like just about the perfect travel kit to me, 12-24G and 24-70GM.
Thanks Gary and Jim!
Yes, those two lenses do make a good travel pair. They rode on the bicycle throughout Mallorca but I did sneak a couple of primes to shoot after cycling!
rji2goleez wrote
More scenes from Palma de MallorcaThat seems like just about the perfect travel kit to me, 12-24G and 24-70GM.
Thanks Gary and Jim!
Yes, those two lenses do make a good travel pair. They rode on the bicycle throughout Mallorca but I did sneak a couple of primes to shoot after cycling!
Oct 04, 2017 at 09:01 AM
p.2455 #5Sony FE Images Thread
Wildflowers for Tom Petty
The Ballet Of Transition I by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
The Ballet Of Transition II by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
The Ballet Of Transition III by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
The Ballet Of Transition IV by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
A7R Infrared, FE 2.8/90 Macro G
Oct 04, 2017 at 09:02 AM
p.2455 #6Sony FE Images Thread
Sony A7 II + Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm f/4 ZA OSS by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Oct 04, 2017 at 10:13 AM
p.2455 #7Sony FE Images Thread
Beautiful Ronny . . . Now that's different than a lot of what we see. Congrats.
By the way, do you live in Iceland now? Or do you take month long vacations there? I've never seen so many consistently beautiful images.
By the way, do you live in Iceland now? Or do you take month long vacations there? I've never seen so many consistently beautiful images.
Oct 04, 2017 at 11:53 AM
p.2455 #8Sony FE Images Thread
rji2goleez wrote:
Beautiful Ronny . . . Now that's different than a lot of what we see. Congrats.
By the way, do you live in Iceland now? Or do you take month long vacations there? I've never seen so many consistently beautiful images.
Haha ..I have not moved there , but surely it's beautiful
Thanks Bob !
Sony A7 II + Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm f/4 ZA OSS by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Beautiful Ronny . . . Now that's different than a lot of what we see. Congrats.
By the way, do you live in Iceland now? Or do you take month long vacations there? I've never seen so many consistently beautiful images.
Haha ..I have not moved there , but surely it's beautiful
Thanks Bob !
Sony A7 II + Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm f/4 ZA OSS by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Oct 04, 2017 at 12:01 PM
p.2455 #9Sony FE Images Thread
Couple more images from LA. First one is from the Laowa 15mm
Oct 04, 2017 at 12:21 PM
p.2455 #10Sony FE Images Thread
Last for today
A7R II + Contax 100-300mm F/4.5-5.6 Vario-Sonnar T* by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
A7R II + Contax 100-300mm F/4.5-5.6 Vario-Sonnar T* by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Oct 04, 2017 at 12:49 PM
|
p.2455 #11Sony FE Images Thread
Ronny, great work from Iceland, your trip definitely was worth it even weather was challenging. Technical question: is the 16-35 really so soft (or weak microcontrast) compared to Loxia 21 (and Loxia 50)? Or is it because 16-35 photos were shoot with A7mkII and Loxia 21/50 photos with A7r mkII, and your downscaling process from larger megapixel camera results sharper images?
If you compare sharpness (on forum size images) for example this Loxia 50 image and this Loxia 21 image then all 16-35 images have much weaker micro-contrast and sharpness (pick any, non of them are even close to as sharp as Loxia photos).
Samuli
If you compare sharpness (on forum size images) for example this Loxia 50 image and this Loxia 21 image then all 16-35 images have much weaker micro-contrast and sharpness (pick any, non of them are even close to as sharp as Loxia photos).
Samuli
Oct 04, 2017 at 01:27 PM
p.2455 #12Sony FE Images Thread
Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 4/80-200 CY @ f/8.0 & 90mm, 1/30s, A7(Kolari v2) @ ISO 100, B+W 55 CIRCULAR - POL
Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 4/80-200 CY @ f/8.0 & 90mm, 1/5s, A7(Kolari v2) @ ISO 100, B+W 55 CIRCULAR - POL
Samuli
Oct 04, 2017 at 01:30 PM
p.2455 #13Sony FE Images Thread
Samuli Vahonen wrote:
Ronny, great work from Iceland, your trip definitely was worth it even weather was challenging. Technical question: is the 16-35 really so soft (or weak microcontrast) compared to Loxia 21 (and Loxia 50)? Or is it because 16-35 photos were shoot with A7mkII and Loxia 21/50 photos with A7r mkII, and your downscaling process from larger megapixel camera results sharper images?
If you compare sharpness (on forum size images) for example this Loxia 50 image and this Loxia 21 image then all 16-35 images have much weaker micro-contrast and sharpness (pick any, non of them are even close to as...Show more →
Thanks Samuli
You are absolutely right. My 16-35 f4 is much weaker than Loxia 21 and 50
If that's because I only used it on A7II instead of A7R II ..I don't know .. but I agree with you
is not the same punch in the zoom images as on Loxia
It may be because I used it on many pictures at 16 or 35mm which are probably the weakest focal lengths ?
if I can find equal pictures and edit in exactly the same way where I use 16-35 on 21mm any compare it to loxia 21 and upload something so we can compare ..if there is an interest in a comparison
Edited on Oct 04, 2017 at 02:19 PM · View previous versions
Ronny, great work from Iceland, your trip definitely was worth it even weather was challenging. Technical question: is the 16-35 really so soft (or weak microcontrast) compared to Loxia 21 (and Loxia 50)? Or is it because 16-35 photos were shoot with A7mkII and Loxia 21/50 photos with A7r mkII, and your downscaling process from larger megapixel camera results sharper images?
If you compare sharpness (on forum size images) for example this Loxia 50 image and this Loxia 21 image then all 16-35 images have much weaker micro-contrast and sharpness (pick any, non of them are even close to as...Show more →
Thanks Samuli
You are absolutely right. My 16-35 f4 is much weaker than Loxia 21 and 50
If that's because I only used it on A7II instead of A7R II ..I don't know .. but I agree with you
is not the same punch in the zoom images as on Loxia
It may be because I used it on many pictures at 16 or 35mm which are probably the weakest focal lengths ?
if I can find equal pictures and edit in exactly the same way where I use 16-35 on 21mm any compare it to loxia 21 and upload something so we can compare ..if there is an interest in a comparison
Edited on Oct 04, 2017 at 02:19 PM · View previous versions
Oct 04, 2017 at 02:03 PM
p.2455 #14Sony FE Images Thread
GMPhotography wrote:
Couple more images from LA. First one is from the Laowa 15mm
Are you just hitting all the tourist hotspots with your new Laowa 15?
Great shots, Guy!
Couple more images from LA. First one is from the Laowa 15mm
Are you just hitting all the tourist hotspots with your new Laowa 15?
Great shots, Guy!
Oct 04, 2017 at 02:17 PM
p.2455 #15Sony FE Images Thread
Edited on Oct 04, 2017 at 02:56 PM · View previous versions
Oct 04, 2017 at 02:24 PM
p.2455 #16Sony FE Images Thread
Ronny Olsson wrote:
If you compare sharpness (on forum size images) for example this Loxia 50 image and this Loxia 21 image then all 16-35 images have much weaker micro-contrast and sharpness (pick any, non of them are even close to as sharp as Loxia photos).
SamuliThanks Samuli
You are absolutely right. My 16-35 f4 is much weaker than Loxia 21 and 50
If that's because I only used it on A7II instead of A7R II ..I don't know .. but I agree with you
is not the same punch in the zoom images as on Loxia
It may be because I used it on many pictures at 16 or 35mm which are probably the weakest focal lengths ?
if I can find equal pictures and edit in exactly the same way where I use 16-35 on 21mm any compare it to loxia 21 and upload something so we can...Show more →
I believe 16-25 is supposed to be the stronger FL for this lens with 35 being the weakest.
Samuli Vahonen wrote
Ronny, great work from Iceland, your trip definitely was worth it even weather was challenging. Technical question: is the 16-35 really so soft (or weak microcontrast) compared to Loxia 21 (and Loxia 50)? Or is it because 16-35 photos were shoot with A7mkII and Loxia 21/50 photos with A7r mkII, and your downscaling process from larger megapixel camera results sharper images?If you compare sharpness (on forum size images) for example this Loxia 50 image and this Loxia 21 image then all 16-35 images have much weaker micro-contrast and sharpness (pick any, non of them are even close to as sharp as Loxia photos).
Samuli
You are absolutely right. My 16-35 f4 is much weaker than Loxia 21 and 50
If that's because I only used it on A7II instead of A7R II ..I don't know .. but I agree with you
is not the same punch in the zoom images as on Loxia
It may be because I used it on many pictures at 16 or 35mm which are probably the weakest focal lengths ?
if I can find equal pictures and edit in exactly the same way where I use 16-35 on 21mm any compare it to loxia 21 and upload something so we can...Show more →
I believe 16-25 is supposed to be the stronger FL for this lens with 35 being the weakest.
Oct 04, 2017 at 02:29 PM
p.2455 #17Sony FE Images Thread
Phillip Reeve wrote:
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4512/37500165871_24d226df9f_o.jpg
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4446/36790173944_6d96e15155_o.jpg
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4446/36790173944_6d96e15155_o.jpg
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4457/37452248466_b89b833c53_o.jpg
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4472/37452248076_db2bc8022a_o.jpg
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4465/37452248736_e8050d6583_o.jpg
Hi Phillip -- Great shots!
I'm not getting the difference between shot 2 and 3. They look the same at quick comparison. Something you wanted to compare in them?
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4512/37500165871_24d226df9f_o.jpg
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4446/36790173944_6d96e15155_o.jpg
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4446/36790173944_6d96e15155_o.jpg
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4457/37452248466_b89b833c53_o.jpg
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4472/37452248076_db2bc8022a_o.jpg
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4465/37452248736_e8050d6583_o.jpg
Hi Phillip -- Great shots!
I'm not getting the difference between shot 2 and 3. They look the same at quick comparison. Something you wanted to compare in them?
Oct 04, 2017 at 02:30 PM
p.2455 #18Sony FE Images Thread
Gunzorro wrote:
Are you just hitting all the tourist hotspots with your new Laowa 15?
Great shots, Guy!
Actually getting images for a show in January. Im in charge of ALL multi media stuff and I like to open the show with photography and what city we are in. I do this for NY as well. Actually going to NY this month.
My wife runs a big Model and Talent convention and I do a lot of photography for it and also to support it via presentations and anything that goes on the big screen. Im that guy.
But having said that this is the easiest gig I ever done. Just go out and shoot. Gotta love that
GMPhotography wrote
Couple more images from LA. First one is from the Laowa 15mmGreat shots, Guy!
Actually getting images for a show in January. Im in charge of ALL multi media stuff and I like to open the show with photography and what city we are in. I do this for NY as well. Actually going to NY this month.My wife runs a big Model and Talent convention and I do a lot of photography for it and also to support it via presentations and anything that goes on the big screen. Im that guy.
But having said that this is the easiest gig I ever done. Just go out and shoot. Gotta love that
Oct 04, 2017 at 02:37 PM
p.2455 #19Sony FE Images Thread
Ronny, I also assumed that that it just doesn't have the same punch as Loxias. It's difficult to match Loxia 21 & 50 (& 35 and 85) on landscapes. Few months ago I was afraid you getting this zoom that it may not get results you are familiar with other lenses.
Phillip's 16-35 looks plenty sharp on forum size, thou lacking same kind of punch what Loxia 21 images have.
I have already 3 times decided to not buy Loxia 21, and I'm again considering it...Then again realizing that I never would shoot landscapes with so wide lens, and having better lenses for 21mm boke shooting, and then not considering buying it anymore...
Samuli
Phillip's 16-35 looks plenty sharp on forum size, thou lacking same kind of punch what Loxia 21 images have.
I have already 3 times decided to not buy Loxia 21, and I'm again considering it...Then again realizing that I never would shoot landscapes with so wide lens, and having better lenses for 21mm boke shooting, and then not considering buying it anymore...
Samuli
Oct 04, 2017 at 02:50 PM
p.2455 #20Sony FE Images Thread
Gunzorro wrote:
Phillip Reeve wrote
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4512/37500165871_24d226df9f_o.jpghttps://farm5.staticflickr.com/4446/36790173944_6d96e15155_o.jpg
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4446/36790173944_6d96e15155_o.jpg
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4457/37452248466_b89b833c53_o.jpg
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4472/37452248076_db2bc8022a_o.jpg
https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4465/37452248736_e8050d6583_o.jpg
I'm not getting the difference between shot 2 and 3. They look the same at quick comparison. Something you wanted to compare in them?
Nah just accidentally pasted the same image twice but thanks for pointing it out to me
Oct 04, 2017 at 02:57 PM