Samuli Vahonen wrote:
Ronny, great work from Iceland, your trip definitely was worth it even weather was challenging. Technical question: is the 16-35 really so soft (or weak microcontrast) compared to Loxia 21 (and Loxia 50)? Or is it because 16-35 photos were shoot with A7mkII and Loxia 21/50 photos with A7r mkII, and your downscaling process from larger megapixel camera results sharper images?
If you compare sharpness (on forum size images) for example this Loxia 50 image and this Loxia 21 image then all 16-35 images have much weaker micro-contrast and sharpness (pick any, non of them are even close to as sharp as Loxia photos).
Samuli
Thanks Samuli
You are absolutely right. My 16-35 f4 is much weaker than Loxia 21 and 50
If that's because I only used it on A7II instead of A7R II ..I don't know .. but I agree with you
is not the same punch in the zoom images on Loxia
It may be because I used it on many pictures at 16 or 35mm which are probably the weakest focal lengths ?
if I can find equal pictures and edit in exactly the same way where I use 16-35 on 21mm any compare it to loxia 21 and upload something so we can compare ..if there is an interest in a comparison
Oct 04, 2017 at 03:03 PM
Previous versions of Ronny Olsson's message #14204936 « Sony FE Images Thread »
