globalkiwi wrote:
No offense intended but is there some reason why we should automatically believe a post here over one there? I don't see that there's much difference credibility-wise.
Edited by globalkiwi on Sep 06, 2008 at 04:40 PM GMT
Never said mine was correct, just another drop in the pool... Why I use Nikon has nothing do to with it.. Used Canon for 15 years until D3 was announced..
It does bring up the point, however, that there is more than one camera style shown in the various teaser ads. I hadn't really thought about this fact, but the obvious answer is that Canon is releasing more than one camera.
I doubt camera number 2 is a 3D. I think it would be a low cost full frame: 12/16mp and 3fps. This is a good place to compete with Nikon, who must buy their sensors.
OCphotography wrote:
Never said mine was correct, just another drop in the pool... Why I use Nikon has nothing do to with it.. Used Canon for 15 years until D3 was announced..
Please photoshop two 3D. One with flash, one without. 3D and 3Df. Then we can stop the never ending in-camera flash discussion.
Oh, and for me please put a GPS label on the 3D. That will make me happy.
Can't say I've seen flash sync speed mentioned yet. I don't want to see anything slower than 1/250.
I'm assuming the file size, speed and general whiz bang with be there. The 50d set a current minimum. The single unknown make or break thing that can't be read from a spec sheet is focus accuracy. It took three 40d to get one that works 'fine'. I never had to return any prior Canon product before to this. It still isn't great shakes shooting something wide open at a whopping 200mm either. I wouldn't race out to get a 50 I want/need/expect something to equal my trusty but aging 1dm2 before the money walks.
tayo wrote:
Ouch. Foul! Since when are porn mags beautiful? I don't like any of them. I chose the 5D for the image quality, but I'm glad it's also one of the most beautiful cameras.
With your technical understanding, "why not just" build your own flash, and put it on the hot shoe?
What's wrong with suggesting a hot shoe solution that has all the properties you are looking for?
...which can draw power from the camera battery through the hot shoe? I didn't know Canon's hot shoe had that capability. Seriously, batteries are an eternal nuisance. Only having to bring one type is a great advantage that the D700, D300, 50D, 40D, 30D, 20D, and rebels all enjoy. But because I like full frame, Canon is determined to inconvenience me by not providing a simple pop-up flash available in all those models, and charge me $400 for the privilege of a flash which isn't even as good for my purposes.
I'm only joking about the porn. We all like gear that looks nice. But for me, that comes long after capabilities. Let's face it, an IXUS is prettier than a 5D. But it won't do the job.
mfurman wrote:
Unfortunately, I could not get an answer to my question so being "analytical" (or Canadian) did not help me
Sorry fellas - missed that question. I used to use Nikons, but switched to Canon for the 5D because it seemed to me that 5D image quality wasn't worth waiting for. I don't regret switching, but I do find not having a built-in flash a constant annoyance. I have just sold my last 5D, and my main camera is currently a 1Ds3. Would I like my 1Ds3 to have a built-in flash? Hell yes, and at that price, why not. I really don't much care how pretty it is. Pretty doesn't get the job done.
I currently use Olympus T20 flash units because their exposure is as reliable as Canon's, if not more so, and they are low-profile, so the bulb isn't as far from the lens axis as a Canon flash.
Mmmm. D700. Full frame. Weather-sealed. Pop-up flash. Will I get one or struggle on with non-dedicated flash? Let's wait and see what the 7D is like.
brainiac wrote:
...which can draw power from the camera battery through the hot shoe? I didn't know Canon's hot shoe had that capability. Seriously, batteries are an eternal nuisance. Only having to bring one type is a great advantage that the D700, D300, 50D, 40D, 30D, 20D, and rebels all enjoy. But because I like full frame, Canon is determined to inconvenience me by not providing a simple pop-up flash available in all those models, and charge me $400 for the privilege of a flash which isn't even as good for my purposes.
I'm only joking about the porn. We all like gear that looks nice. But for me, that comes long after capabilities. Let's face it, an IXUS is prettier than a 5D. But it won't do the job....Show more →
I don't like the IXUS look. It makes me think of a box of cigarettes. The G9 look isn't much better, however I do own one.
So you've ordered a D700, right?
Seriously, I'd prefer Canon adds that capability to its hot shoe. (I've already mentioned that as a question.) Would also help reduce the cost, weight and size of wireless flash triggers, for example. That seems something I'd be in favor of also by myself.
Edit: I see you're at least thinking about ordering one...
I have been sitting at work checking out d700 images at iso 6400... if the 5d mk II is at that level (or better), I'm getting one. Weather sealing or not, popupflash or not.. seriously, the versatility you have with a f/1.2 lens and 6400 iso is just insane
ulrikft wrote:
I have been sitting at work checking out d700 images at iso 6400... if the 5d mk II is at that level (or better), I'm getting one. Weather sealing or not, popupflash or not.. seriously, the versatility you have with a f/1.2 lens and 6400 iso is just insane
Especially if you add IS to the lens, provided it works at that light...
Guys, I understand many of you (like me) start to drive crazy.
But must things like japanese cars and internal or external flashes or the advantage/disadvantage of huge pic sizes be discussed here?
As far I can read, this is the 5D rumor thread. It will be only a couple of some more days till we KNOW. It would help me and my timetable to feed that thread with content to the topic instead of endless & useless discussions about "why I prefere a build in flash/why it is nonsense" etc. Believe me. The camera is finished and all your unfullfilled wishes will remain so. You should discuss that in a "flash" thread or in a new "why I am so happy/unhappy about 5D2 because it does not have xyz" thread later.
Those specs look good but nothing is official so its just dreaming right now. Hopefully they don't use a 21mp sensor and still have 3fps I would much rather have a 16mp sensor with 5-6fps but who know what the official specs are just rumors.... If the camera ends up being 3fps I will just look into buying a 1D3 or 1DIIN not a big deal they should go down in price a bit anyway hopefully.
I think most people would notice that the 7 is much brighter that the "D" I say nice Photoshop job but you blow it !!
Most dreamer will say it's not what they expected... because they didn't have the buck to lay out in the first place!
I'm glad some of you did Flip to Nikon, it puts me higher on the list!!