Let's just hope the 5d2 will actually be available in a timely manner. That's another thing Nikon has over Canon. When a model comes out, it's actually available (at least the d700 is). Canon's history is to not be available to purchase on a wide scale for months after they're "for sale."
I think you've got things turned around my friend. Nikon is famous for not having their gear available for weeks or months after they announce it, at least until this resent string of announcements, particularly with their glass. If Canon announces in Sept. during the show, it's available in October ala the 5D.
Am I the only one who is hoping for a 5DII not so I can buy one myself, but so I can buy a cheap 5D from an upgrader? The current 5D is already more camera than I need, if only I could afford one
You're right. I'm just remembering the 1 series fiasco where the new cameras weren't avail for a long time despite being officially on sale. Hopefully the 5d2 will have a fast turnaround as well.
I'm still relatively new to the Canon world (40D was first Canon camera back when it first came out), so, historically speaking, what has the release of a new model done to the used market prices?
I just bought a 5D kit (before the rebate ended), and I have no regrets there, but I bought it knowing that I would likely want to upgrade to the 5D II or whatever in 6-12 months depending on the price, feature-set, etc.
I'm mostly just curious what people (those of you that are realistic, not the ones who think they are getting a $500 5D in 3 months) are expecting. $1000 used? More? Less? In what timeframe?
I've tried to avoid most of the speculation threads and topics around the 5D II, and this sort of falls into that realm, but as I said, I am hoping to get some historical info and precedent from those of you that have been Canonites for longer than I.
adam613 wrote:
Am I the only one who is hoping for a 5DII not so I can buy one myself, but so I can buy a cheap 5D from an upgrader? The current 5D is already more camera than I need, if only I could afford one
You're taking a gamble with that approach and teetering on the knife's edge, as the used 5D prices can go one way or the other after the release of it's successor. If the new release is $3000 or more, you can bet the used market prices will go up to reflect that as well. If it's cheeper than expected, than I'm sure the used prices will fall. They might stay the same at best though. If you want one, I say get it now.
mfurman wrote:
As I posted above, there are already $1000 5D cameras being sold.
One person who is unaware of the current used market going rates does not suddenly cause the floor to fall out from underneath the rest of the market. Current realistic going rate is $1500 or so.
AGeoJO wrote:
Go, Canon, go ! By the way, I am guessing that the price of the 7D (the 5D replacment) to be $2,999.00, just like the Nikon D700.
I agree with you on that one. I don't think they could get more than 3K for it, but I also don't think it will be much less than 3K. I was thinking 2.7k to 3k range.
adam613 wrote:
Am I the only one who is hoping for a 5DII not so I can buy one myself, but so I can buy a cheap 5D from an upgrader? The current 5D is already more camera than I need, if only I could afford one
Yup, I want a third then I'm going to have the AA filter torn out for some fun!
mfurman wrote:
As I posted above, there are already $1000 5D cameras being sold.
Where was that?
After deducting $900 for the 24-105, my new 5D cost me $1650 from Amazon. For that price I am totally in love. I would not, could not pay $1000 more for a mkII even if it has 14bit/nicer lcd/self cleaning/iso inthe vf/16mp/digicIII/4fps
But for gods sake, let the rumor mongering be over. I totally believe THIS OP. He has yet to lead us astray.
adam613 wrote:
Am I the only one who is hoping for a 5DII not so I can buy one myself, but so I can buy a cheap 5D from an upgrader? The current 5D is already more camera than I need, if only I could afford one
Raises Hand :-) That's what I am waiting for.... unless the replacement is priced well and has a package that I cannot live without (VERY unlikely).
You don't think the 1Ds III is overpriced? I would be shocked if the 24-megapixel Nikon and Sony bodies should cost much more than $6,000. Well, maybe after comparing the prices of the 200/2 lens, maybe I shouldn't be too surprised that some new Canon stuff is way overpriced.
httivals wrote:
I'm waiting for them to announce the new 5DII so that I can then go buy a 1DsIII for $8,000 (or thereabouts). I've making myself wait it out so that way I'll feel like I explored my options, but I still expect that the 1DsIII will better suit my needs/desires and will be worth it, unless Canon comes out with a "mini 1Ds" with about 18 megapixels, or more, at a price of somewhere around $6,000 (or less) -- that would be my dream camera.