Post your recent film shots!
p.927 #2Post your recent film shots!
A brief encounter with a Canon 7S. Kodak Tmax 400.
Apr 16, 2022 at 06:18 PM
p.927 #3Post your recent film shots!
genji wrote:
A brief encounter with a Canon 7S. Kodak Tmax 400.
https://d1u92k3d1w68j5.cloudfront.net/photos/facades/jd-20210329-kodak-tmax-400-7sb-03-w1200bc.jpg
Why brief?
A brief encounter with a Canon 7S. Kodak Tmax 400.
https://d1u92k3d1w68j5.cloudfront.net/photos/facades/jd-20210329-kodak-tmax-400-7sb-03-w1200bc.jpg
Why brief?
Apr 16, 2022 at 06:58 PM
p.927 #4Post your recent film shots!
Mamiya M645, all with the 150/3.5 except for the 3rd and 5th, which are with the 35/3.5. Kodak Tri-X 400, Df96.
Apr 16, 2022 at 07:06 PM
p.927 #5Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
https://d1u92k3d1w68j5.cloudfront.net/photos/facades/jd-20210329-kodak-tmax-400-7sb-03-w1200bc.jpgWhy brief?
I bought and returned two “mint” 7s bodies because the rangefinder patch in each was barely useable. But I keep thinking about getting another LTM body because I have a nice collection of 50mm LTM lenses which, for reasons I don’t understand, don’t focus accurately when used on my digital M bodies. Maybe I should try a Leica IIIg.
genji wrote
A brief encounter with a Canon 7S. Kodak Tmax 400.https://d1u92k3d1w68j5.cloudfront.net/photos/facades/jd-20210329-kodak-tmax-400-7sb-03-w1200bc.jpg
I bought and returned two “mint” 7s bodies because the rangefinder patch in each was barely useable. But I keep thinking about getting another LTM body because I have a nice collection of 50mm LTM lenses which, for reasons I don’t understand, don’t focus accurately when used on my digital M bodies. Maybe I should try a Leica IIIg.
Apr 16, 2022 at 07:45 PM
p.927 #6Post your recent film shots!
genji wrote:
https://d1u92k3d1w68j5.cloudfront.net/photos/facades/jd-20210329-kodak-tmax-400-7sb-03-w1200bc.jpgWhy brief?I bought and returned two “mint” 7s bodies because the rangefinder patch in each was barely useable. But I keep thinking about getting another LTM body because I have a nice collection of 50mm LTM lenses which, for reasons I don’t understand, don’t focus accurately when used on my digital M bodies. Maybe I should try a Leica IIIg.
Adapter maybe? Unless all of your LTM 50's are out of cal.
Konica Genba Kantoku DD (@60mm) + Expired Kodak Gold 400
Desmolicious wrote
genji wrote
A brief encounter with a Canon 7S. Kodak Tmax 400.https://d1u92k3d1w68j5.cloudfront.net/photos/facades/jd-20210329-kodak-tmax-400-7sb-03-w1200bc.jpg
Adapter maybe? Unless all of your LTM 50's are out of cal.
Konica Genba Kantoku DD (@60mm) + Expired Kodak Gold 400
Apr 16, 2022 at 08:31 PM
p.927 #7Post your recent film shots!
helimat wrote:
Adapter maybe? Unless all of your LTM 50's are out of cal.
I’ve tried multiple adapters (including Voigtlander adapters) and when I focus with the rangefinder patch then compare to LV there’s a mismatch, either front or back focusing.
Adapter maybe? Unless all of your LTM 50's are out of cal.
I’ve tried multiple adapters (including Voigtlander adapters) and when I focus with the rangefinder patch then compare to LV there’s a mismatch, either front or back focusing.
Apr 16, 2022 at 09:07 PM
p.927 #8Post your recent film shots!
genji wrote:
https://d1u92k3d1w68j5.cloudfront.net/photos/facades/jd-20210329-kodak-tmax-400-7sb-03-w1200bc.jpgWhy brief?I bought and returned two “mint” 7s bodies because the rangefinder patch in each was barely useable. But I keep thinking about getting another LTM body because I have a nice collection of 50mm LTM lenses which, for reasons I don’t understand, don’t focus accurately when used on my digital M bodies. Maybe I should try a Leica IIIg.
That's weird. All my LTM lenses focus accurately on my M bodies. I use Fotodiox adapters. My LTM lenses are:
Orion 15 28mm f6
CV 50mm 2.5
Rollei 40mm 2.8
CV 28mm 3.5
Desmolicious wrote
genji wrote
A brief encounter with a Canon 7S. Kodak Tmax 400.https://d1u92k3d1w68j5.cloudfront.net/photos/facades/jd-20210329-kodak-tmax-400-7sb-03-w1200bc.jpg
That's weird. All my LTM lenses focus accurately on my M bodies. I use Fotodiox adapters. My LTM lenses are:
Orion 15 28mm f6
CV 50mm 2.5
Rollei 40mm 2.8
CV 28mm 3.5
Apr 16, 2022 at 09:08 PM
p.927 #9Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
That's weird. All my LTM lenses focus accurately on my M bodies. I use Fotodiox adapters. My LTM lenses are:
Orion 15 28mm f6
CV 50mm 2.5
Rollei 40mm 2.8
CV 28mm 3.5
I’ve just ordered three Fotodiox Pro adapters (28/90, 35/135, and 50/75). Here’s hoping…
That's weird. All my LTM lenses focus accurately on my M bodies. I use Fotodiox adapters. My LTM lenses are:
Orion 15 28mm f6
CV 50mm 2.5
Rollei 40mm 2.8
CV 28mm 3.5
I’ve just ordered three Fotodiox Pro adapters (28/90, 35/135, and 50/75). Here’s hoping…
Apr 16, 2022 at 09:43 PM
p.927 #10Post your recent film shots!
genji wrote:
Orion 15 28mm f6
CV 50mm 2.5
Rollei 40mm 2.8
CV 28mm 3.5I’ve just ordered three Fotodiox Pro adapters (28/90, 35/135, and 50/75). Here’s hoping…
I have Leica LTM adapters, Voigtlander ones and now only buy Fotodiox if I need any more. Because I have noticed zero difference in use.
Desmolicious wrote
That's weird. All my LTM lenses focus accurately on my M bodies. I use Fotodiox adapters. My LTM lenses are:Orion 15 28mm f6
CV 50mm 2.5
Rollei 40mm 2.8
CV 28mm 3.5
I have Leica LTM adapters, Voigtlander ones and now only buy Fotodiox if I need any more. Because I have noticed zero difference in use.
Apr 16, 2022 at 09:47 PM
|
p.927 #11Post your recent film shots!
genji wrote:
Orion 15 28mm f6
CV 50mm 2.5
Rollei 40mm 2.8
CV 28mm 3.5I’ve just ordered three Fotodiox Pro adapters (28/90, 35/135, and 50/75). Here’s hoping…
I've had good success with the Fotodiox Pro adapters as well with a number of LTM lenses. Hopefully that does it!
Xpan + 45/4 + Kodak Tmax 400
Desmolicious wrote
That's weird. All my LTM lenses focus accurately on my M bodies. I use Fotodiox adapters. My LTM lenses are:Orion 15 28mm f6
CV 50mm 2.5
Rollei 40mm 2.8
CV 28mm 3.5
I've had good success with the Fotodiox Pro adapters as well with a number of LTM lenses. Hopefully that does it!
Xpan + 45/4 + Kodak Tmax 400
Apr 16, 2022 at 09:52 PM
p.927 #12Post your recent film shots!
helimat wrote:
Orion 15 28mm f6
CV 50mm 2.5
Rollei 40mm 2.8
CV 28mm 3.5I’ve just ordered three Fotodiox Pro adapters (28/90, 35/135, and 50/75). Here’s hoping…I've had good success with the Fotodiox Pro adapters as well with a number of LTM lenses. Hopefully that does it!
Xpan + 45/4 + Kodak Tmax 400
Love this one!
genji wrote
Desmolicious wrote
That's weird. All my LTM lenses focus accurately on my M bodies. I use Fotodiox adapters. My LTM lenses are:Orion 15 28mm f6
CV 50mm 2.5
Rollei 40mm 2.8
CV 28mm 3.5
Xpan + 45/4 + Kodak Tmax 400
Love this one!
Apr 16, 2022 at 10:23 PM
p.927 #13Post your recent film shots!
A day trip to Pinnacle National Park. It looks a bit like the Flintstones.
M6, 35 cron, FP4+, XTOL
M6, 35 cron, FP4+, XTOL
Apr 16, 2022 at 10:55 PM
p.927 #14Post your recent film shots!
Keahi08 wrote:
Love this one!
Thanks!
A few shots from CYZT with the M6 + Collapsible Summicron + Kodak Portra 400
Love this one!
Thanks!
A few shots from CYZT with the M6 + Collapsible Summicron + Kodak Portra 400
Apr 17, 2022 at 09:01 AM
p.927 #15Post your recent film shots!
Session 2 of developing my own film. This time it was two rolls of Potsdam Kino. Having grown up in Germany, not too far from Potsdam actually, I had bought this film rather impulsively fully expecting it to be a gimmick film. Two rolls previous rolls developed by the lab came back full of defects in the highlights, and I had initially assumed that the film was at fault. Now that I have started developing my own film, I put that hypothesis to the test, and I can confidently say that I was wrong, the film is fine, the defects probably came from the lab, most likely drying marks.
Roll 074: Potsdam Kino in GW690II, developed for 10 minutes in DD-X, 1:9 in Simma Sine wave roller. I took the development times from the massive dev chart for 1:4, added 50% to the dev time for the change in concentration, subtracted 20% for the constant agitation, and subtracted another minute because my solution was at 22C, not 20C.
Roll 075: as above.
The GW690II continues to be a pleasure to use!
Edited on Apr 19, 2022 at 04:14 PM · View previous versions
Roll 074: Potsdam Kino in GW690II, developed for 10 minutes in DD-X, 1:9 in Simma Sine wave roller. I took the development times from the massive dev chart for 1:4, added 50% to the dev time for the change in concentration, subtracted 20% for the constant agitation, and subtracted another minute because my solution was at 22C, not 20C.
Roll 075: as above.
The GW690II continues to be a pleasure to use!
Edited on Apr 19, 2022 at 04:14 PM · View previous versions
Apr 17, 2022 at 10:45 AM
p.927 #18Post your recent film shots!
helimat wrote:
Thanks!
A few shots from CYZT with the M6 + Collapsible Summicron + Kodak Portra 400
Love the colors in the helicopter shot!
Next batch of Venice pictures. Had nothing but cloudless blue skies on my trip so not the best sunrise ever for photography, but still a nice experience.
Venezia x Portra 400 VI by Felix, auf Flickr
Venezia x Portra 400 VII by Felix, auf Flickr
Venezia x Portra 400 VIII by Felix, auf Flickr
Keahi08 wrote
Love this one!A few shots from CYZT with the M6 + Collapsible Summicron + Kodak Portra 400
Love the colors in the helicopter shot!
Next batch of Venice pictures. Had nothing but cloudless blue skies on my trip so not the best sunrise ever for photography, but still a nice experience.
Venezia x Portra 400 VI by Felix, auf FlickrVenezia x Portra 400 VII by Felix, auf FlickrVenezia x Portra 400 VIII by Felix, auf FlickrApr 18, 2022 at 04:39 AM
p.927 #19Post your recent film shots!
Fantastic detail in those images! 👆🏼
EOS 1V + Tamron 35-150 + Kodak Tmax 400
EOS 1V + Tamron 35-150 + Kodak Tmax 400
Apr 18, 2022 at 10:27 AM
