Post your recent film shots!
p.682 #1Post your recent film shots!
rattymouse wrote:
edwardkaraa wrote
rattymouse wrote
edwardkaraa wrote
rattymouse wrote
One of my latest:Fujifilm TX-1, 30mm f/5.6 lens, AgfaPhoto Vista 200, Plustek OpticFilm 120 scanner.
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4663/39151031245_8985e7bddc_b.jpg
Nikon FM2n, Velvia 50.
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7675/17190442668_f5faef7430_b.jpg
Fujifilm GF670, Astia 100F.
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7509/16110330428_4b92e5cc48_b.jpg
Fujifilm GF670W, Provia 100F.
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7223/13306241835_9e3636f13c_b.jpg
Nikon FM2N, Neopan Acros.
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5327/17248815838_a738e5bbc9_b.jpg
Nikon FM2n, Velvia 50
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8751/17352290236_940539ff24_b.jpg
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8885/17190447228_00071c3d7d_b.jpg
Nikon FM2n, Provia 100F
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3688/9365290542_11b7694635_b.jpg
Great photos and scans! I’m pleasantly surprised about the colors and Dmax (which is the scanner ability to see in the dark areas of film). I have a Nikon Coolscan V which is a superb scanner, but there is only one place in the world that services it, and it’s in Miami. It would cost me the price of the scanner for each service. It’s nice to know I have another good option just in case. Thank you RM.
Feb 04, 2018 at 06:52 AM
p.682 #2Post your recent film shots!
Canon 1V w/100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L II lens. AgfaPhoto Vista 200 film.
Feb 04, 2018 at 08:02 AM
p.682 #3Post your recent film shots!
rattymouse wrote:
Wow....I wish I had that much Reala 100. Never shot that film in 35mm format. I have 5 rolls in 120 in the freezer. What did all that cost you?
i got the 20 rolls for $115 shipped - just under $6 a roll, which I think is a REALLY good deal. I am thinking about picking up some 120 format as well, so when i make the jump to MF, i will have some. And for some reason, it seems easier to find in medium format than in 135.
Feb 04, 2018 at 12:14 PM
p.682 #4Post your recent film shots!
Dustin Gent wrote:
i got the 20 rolls for $115 shipped - just under $6 a roll, which I think is a REALLY good deal. I am thinking about picking up some 120 format as well, so when i make the jump to MF, i will have some. And for some reason, it seems easier to find in medium format than in 135.
That is a great price. I'd buy that in a heartbeat.
Reala was discontinued in 35mm format long ago and only recently in 120 format. That's why you find more 120 lying around.
rattymouse wrote
Wow....I wish I had that much Reala 100. Never shot that film in 35mm format. I have 5 rolls in 120 in the freezer. What did all that cost you?That is a great price. I'd buy that in a heartbeat.
Reala was discontinued in 35mm format long ago and only recently in 120 format. That's why you find more 120 lying around.
Feb 04, 2018 at 12:27 PM
p.682 #5Post your recent film shots!
Fujifilm TX-1 w/45mm f/4.0 lens, Kodak Ektar 100.
Feb 04, 2018 at 02:33 PM
p.682 #6Post your recent film shots!
Great Scans Rattymouse - I had the Plustek 120 a few years ago but had some real problems with banding when scanning 120 C41 film. The issue was not present when scanning 35mm or Slide Film. Ended up trying another couple and they all had the same problem.
First image is with a Rolleiflex 2.8F / all others with Hasselblad 203FE and 60mm/3.5 lens - Portra 400 self developed (last one b&w conversion) - Scanned with my Nikon Coolscan 9000
Rose by Nicholas T, on Flickr
Yellow by Nicholas T, on Flickr
Hub by Nicholas T, on Flickr
National Theatre by Nicholas T, on Flickr
First image is with a Rolleiflex 2.8F / all others with Hasselblad 203FE and 60mm/3.5 lens - Portra 400 self developed (last one b&w conversion) - Scanned with my Nikon Coolscan 9000
Rose by Nicholas T, on FlickrYellow by Nicholas T, on FlickrHub by Nicholas T, on FlickrNational Theatre by Nicholas T, on FlickrFeb 04, 2018 at 03:21 PM
p.682 #7Post your recent film shots!
Fujifilm TX-1, 45mm f/4.0 lens, Kodak Ektar 100 film.
Feb 05, 2018 at 02:04 AM
p.682 #8Post your recent film shots!
Two 4x5 photos which I took yesterday with my Swiss Alpina large format camera and Schneider-Kreuznach 210/5.6 Copal lens using Arista 100 film, developed in Xtol (1:2).
 |
||
 |
||
|
|
||
 |
||
|
Feb 05, 2018 at 06:24 AM
p.682 #9Post your recent film shots!
Do you guys know if keeping the 120 film wrapper in place affects long term (freezer) storage? I recently used some Provia 100F which was expired and out of the wrapper but apparently always freezer stored. The results were not very good. Most of the film was really light and resulting images were way overexposed. If the film is out of the wrapper, is it best just to scrap it? Just wanted some input before I try a few more rolls (E6 as well) that I have. Thanks.
Feb 05, 2018 at 12:06 PM
p.682 #10Post your recent film shots!
Gary Clennan wrote:
Do you guys know if keeping the 120 film wrapper in place affects long term (freezer) storage? I recently used some Provia 100F which was expired and out of the wrapper but apparently always freezer stored. The results were not very good. Most of the film was really light and resulting images were way overexposed. If the film is out of the wrapper, is it best just to scrap it? Just wanted some input before I try a few more rolls (E6 as well) that I have. Thanks.
Gary, there’s a reason why the wrapper is totally sealed. Condensation and humidity are the enemies of film. I would think 120 film with its paper backing is very sensitive to humidity. I personally always freeze my film in zip locked plastic bags for extra security. I would certainly not discard the remaining film, but probably wouldn’t shoot anything too important with it. Please keep in mind that it could be a lab mistake too. Normally affected film should come out darker and grainier.
Feb 05, 2018 at 12:17 PM
|
p.682 #11Post your recent film shots!
edwardkaraa wrote:
Gary, there’s a reason why the wrapper is totally sealed. Condensation and humidity are the enemies of film. I would think 120 film with its paper backing is very sensitive to humidity. I personally always freeze my film in zip locked plastic bags for extra security. I would certainly not discard the remaining film, but probably wouldn’t shoot anything too important with it. Please keep in mind that it could be a lab mistake too. Normally affected film should come out darker and grainier.
Or - god forbid, I made a metering mistake?!?
The lab is super trustworthy but could be a factor. It was a very white scene though. A lot of snow all around and a white fog in the air. Probably a bit of a challenge for slide film. Thanks for the info! My Portra160 shots of the same turned out good though....
Edited on Feb 05, 2018 at 02:21 PM · View previous versions
Gary Clennan wrote
Do you guys know if keeping the 120 film wrapper in place affects long term (freezer) storage? I recently used some Provia 100F which was expired and out of the wrapper but apparently always freezer stored. The results were not very good. Most of the film was really light and resulting images were way overexposed. If the film is out of the wrapper, is it best just to scrap it? Just wanted some input before I try a few more rolls (E6 as well) that I have. Thanks.Or - god forbid, I made a metering mistake?!?
The lab is super trustworthy but could be a factor. It was a very white scene though. A lot of snow all around and a white fog in the air. Probably a bit of a challenge for slide film. Thanks for the info! My Portra160 shots of the same turned out good though....Edited on Feb 05, 2018 at 02:21 PM · View previous versions
Feb 05, 2018 at 12:25 PM
p.682 #12Post your recent film shots!
rattymouse wrote:
Fujifilm TX-1, 45mm f/4.0 lens, Kodak Ektar 100 film.
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4744/28312867259_91989e9973_b.jpg
Very glad to see you back, Tom!
Fujifilm TX-1, 45mm f/4.0 lens, Kodak Ektar 100 film.
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4744/28312867259_91989e9973_b.jpg
Very glad to see you back, Tom!
Feb 05, 2018 at 01:35 PM
p.682 #13Post your recent film shots!
Canon 7ne, 17-40L, tmax 100, d76 1:1, pakon scan
and a few, same combo but with diafine
over the edge (of an 80+ foot falls)
below
upper falls
and a few, same combo but with diafine
over the edge (of an 80+ foot falls)
below
upper falls
Feb 05, 2018 at 01:39 PM
p.682 #14Post your recent film shots!
Gary Clennan wrote:
edwardkaraa wrote
Gary Clennan wrote
Do you guys know if keeping the 120 film wrapper in place affects long term (freezer) storage? I recently used some Provia 100F which was expired and out of the wrapper but apparently always freezer stored. The results were not very good. Most of the film was really light and resulting images were way overexposed. If the film is out of the wrapper, is it best just to scrap it? Just wanted some input before I try a few more rolls (E6 as well) that I have. Thanks. The lab is super trustworthy but could be a factor. It was a very white scene though. A lot of snow all around and a white fog in the air. Probably a bit of a challenge for slide film. Thanks for the info! My Portra160 shots of the same turned out good though....How does the film numbering and coding look like? If it looks normal, it’s your mistake. If it looks bleached like the photos, then it’s either the film or the lab. Easy to determine if you take a close look.
https://www.olympus-lifescience.com/en/microscope-resource/primer/photomicrography/colornegprocerrors/
Feb 05, 2018 at 08:17 PM
p.682 #15Post your recent film shots!
edwardkaraa wrote:
Gary, there’s a reason why the wrapper is totally sealed. Condensation and humidity are the enemies of film. I would think 120 film with its paper backing is very sensitive to humidity. I personally always freeze my film in zip locked plastic bags for extra security. I would certainly not discard the remaining film, but probably wouldn’t shoot anything too important with it. Please keep in mind that it could be a lab mistake too. Normally affected film should come out darker and grainier.Or - god forbid, I made a metering mistake?!? The lab is super trustworthy but could be a factor. It was a very white scene though. A lot of snow all around and a white fog in the air. Probably a bit of a challenge for slide film. Thanks for the info! My Portra160 shots of the same turned out good though....How does the film numbering and coding look like? If it looks normal, it’s your mistake. If it looks bleached like the photos, then it’s either the film or the lab. Easy to determine if you take a close look.
https://www.olympus-lifescience.com/en/microscope-resource/primer/photomicrography/colornegprocerrors/
Film numbering/lettering looks perfect. Does this work for all film types? Thanks for the link!
Gary Clennan wrote
edwardkaraa wrote
Gary Clennan wrote
Do you guys know if keeping the 120 film wrapper in place affects long term (freezer) storage? I recently used some Provia 100F which was expired and out of the wrapper but apparently always freezer stored. The results were not very good. Most of the film was really light and resulting images were way overexposed. If the film is out of the wrapper, is it best just to scrap it? Just wanted some input before I try a few more rolls (E6 as well) that I have. Thanks. The lab is super trustworthy but could be a factor. It was a very white scene though. A lot of snow all around and a white fog in the air. Probably a bit of a challenge for slide film. Thanks for the info! My Portra160 shots of the same turned out good though....https://www.olympus-lifescience.com/en/microscope-resource/primer/photomicrography/colornegprocerrors/
Film numbering/lettering looks perfect.
Does this work for all film types? Thanks for the link!Feb 05, 2018 at 10:19 PM
p.682 #18Post your recent film shots!
Gary Clennan wrote:
Gary, there’s a reason why the wrapper is totally sealed. Condensation and humidity are the enemies of film. I would think 120 film with its paper backing is very sensitive to humidity. I personally always freeze my film in zip locked plastic bags for extra security. I would certainly not discard the remaining film, but probably wouldn’t shoot anything too important with it. Please keep in mind that it could be a lab mistake too. Normally affected film should come out darker and grainier.Or - god forbid, I made a metering mistake?!? The lab is super trustworthy but could be a factor. It was a very white scene though. A lot of snow all around and a white fog in the air. Probably a bit of a challenge for slide film. Thanks for the info! My Portra160 shots of the same turned out good though....How does the film numbering and coding look like? If it looks normal, it’s your mistake. If it looks bleached like the photos, then it’s either the film or the lab. Easy to determine if you take a close look.
https://www.olympus-lifescience.com/en/microscope-resource/primer/photomicrography/colornegprocerrors/Film numbering/lettering looks perfect. Does this work for all film types? Thanks for the link!
So it’s your metering, Gary
Yes but for reversal film, developer issues would be reversed. Under development will cause the film to be too thin for negatives and too thick for slides.
Edited on Feb 05, 2018 at 11:24 PM · View previous versions
edwardkaraa wrote
Gary Clennan wrote
edwardkaraa wrote
Gary Clennan wrote
Do you guys know if keeping the 120 film wrapper in place affects long term (freezer) storage? I recently used some Provia 100F which was expired and out of the wrapper but apparently always freezer stored. The results were not very good. Most of the film was really light and resulting images were way overexposed. If the film is out of the wrapper, is it best just to scrap it? Just wanted some input before I try a few more rolls (E6 as well) that I have. Thanks. The lab is super trustworthy but could be a factor. It was a very white scene though. A lot of snow all around and a white fog in the air. Probably a bit of a challenge for slide film. Thanks for the info! My Portra160 shots of the same turned out good though....https://www.olympus-lifescience.com/en/microscope-resource/primer/photomicrography/colornegprocerrors/
Does this work for all film types? Thanks for the link!So it’s your metering, Gary
Yes but for reversal film, developer issues would be reversed. Under development will cause the film to be too thin for negatives and too thick for slides.
Edited on Feb 05, 2018 at 11:24 PM · View previous versions
Feb 05, 2018 at 10:40 PM
p.682 #19Post your recent film shots!
M5, vc 35/2.5 w/ orange filter, delta 100, rodinal, pakon scan
Feb 05, 2018 at 11:21 PM
p.682 #20Post your recent film shots!
edwardkaraa wrote:
Gary, there’s a reason why the wrapper is totally sealed. Condensation and humidity are the enemies of film. I would think 120 film with its paper backing is very sensitive to humidity. I personally always freeze my film in zip locked plastic bags for extra security. I would certainly not discard the remaining film, but probably wouldn’t shoot anything too important with it. Please keep in mind that it could be a lab mistake too. Normally affected film should come out darker and grainier.Or - god forbid, I made a metering mistake?!? The lab is super trustworthy but could be a factor. It was a very white scene though. A lot of snow all around and a white fog in the air. Probably a bit of a challenge for slide film. Thanks for the info! My Portra160 shots of the same turned out good though....How does the film numbering and coding look like? If it looks normal, it’s your mistake. If it looks bleached like the photos, then it’s either the film or the lab. Easy to determine if you take a close look.
https://www.olympus-lifescience.com/en/microscope-resource/primer/photomicrography/colornegprocerrors/Film numbering/lettering looks perfect. Does this work for all film types? Thanks for the link!So it’s your metering, Gary
Yes but for reversal film, developer issues would be reversed. Under development will cause the film to be too thin for negatives and too thick for slides.
Haha - appreciate the info Edward. I will have to look at some other negs to compare. I always thought (could be wrong) that the film lettering I have seen was always good regardless of severe overexposure or underexposure. I remember metering carefully off of a grey-ish colored window to try and get an accurate reading. I didn't want the bright snow and sky to mess with things. I should have bracketed another exposure I guess. Oh well, the joys of film!
Gary Clennan wrote
edwardkaraa wrote
Gary Clennan wrote
edwardkaraa wrote
Gary Clennan wrote
Do you guys know if keeping the 120 film wrapper in place affects long term (freezer) storage? I recently used some Provia 100F which was expired and out of the wrapper but apparently always freezer stored. The results were not very good. Most of the film was really light and resulting images were way overexposed. If the film is out of the wrapper, is it best just to scrap it? Just wanted some input before I try a few more rolls (E6 as well) that I have. Thanks. The lab is super trustworthy but could be a factor. It was a very white scene though. A lot of snow all around and a white fog in the air. Probably a bit of a challenge for slide film. Thanks for the info! My Portra160 shots of the same turned out good though....https://www.olympus-lifescience.com/en/microscope-resource/primer/photomicrography/colornegprocerrors/
Does this work for all film types? Thanks for the link!Yes but for reversal film, developer issues would be reversed. Under development will cause the film to be too thin for negatives and too thick for slides.
Haha - appreciate the info Edward.
I will have to look at some other negs to compare. I always thought (could be wrong) that the film lettering I have seen was always good regardless of severe overexposure or underexposure. I remember metering carefully off of a grey-ish colored window to try and get an accurate reading. I didn't want the bright snow and sky to mess with things. I should have bracketed another exposure I guess. Oh well, the joys of film!Feb 06, 2018 at 09:03 AM