Post your recent film shots!
p.1407 #1Post your recent film shots!
rji2goleez wrote:
Fuji GW690
Portra 400
Cinestill C-41
So sharp.
Fuji GW690
Portra 400
Cinestill C-41
So sharp.
Jan 16, 2025 at 10:03 AM
p.1407 #2Post your recent film shots!
Oldwino wrote:
I did a very rough comparison between Delta 400, Tmax 400, HP5 and Tri-X with the result that HP5 gave me an actual film speed of ISO400, while the others were slower. That was good enough for me to make it my default ISO400 film. I find it classy enough, but perhaps that's because I am using it in 120 size. Also, once I started loving the grain in other peoples' images, I tried to embrace it in my own, and I have mostly succeeded.
For fine grain I either use Acros or digital.In which developer?Rodinal.You generally lose about a stop with Rodinal.
Best HP5 + Rodinal combo I've tried is 1+75 at 14 minutes. (at 400)
That was my expectation too, and it is consistent with both Acros and FP4 giving me half box speed (at 1+75, 15 min). But HP5 in Rodinal 1+60, 20 min, actually gave me ISO400.
theHUN wrote
Oldwino wrote
theHUN wrote
Tina Kino wrote
... I want something that looks a bit more "classy" / elegant than HP5, and Tri-X 400 ...For fine grain I either use Acros or digital.
Best HP5 + Rodinal combo I've tried is 1+75 at 14 minutes. (at 400)
That was my expectation too, and it is consistent with both Acros and FP4 giving me half box speed (at 1+75, 15 min). But HP5 in Rodinal 1+60, 20 min, actually gave me ISO400.
Jan 16, 2025 at 10:38 AM
p.1407 #3Post your recent film shots!
OregonSun wrote:
Seeing all the big Fuji images posted lately has me itching to take out my GSW690II again.
I was recently on the fence about selling it and cashing in on the increase in price since I bought it 5 years ago (paid $500 with 16 on the counter), but I've decided to keep it for now. I don't shoot it much, but nothing else I have matches it for very long exposures with ND filters. Rangefinder allows framing and composition with filters on and 'T' speed means you don't even need a shutter release.
Here's one from the last time I had...Show more →
So beautiful, Heron!
_________________________________________________
Spring blossoms at Washington Park Arboretum, Seattle
Fuji Velvia 50 4x5
Sonnar-7 wrote
So many Fuji GW690.I was recently on the fence about selling it and cashing in on the increase in price since I bought it 5 years ago (paid $500 with 16 on the counter), but I've decided to keep it for now. I don't shoot it much, but nothing else I have matches it for very long exposures with ND filters. Rangefinder allows framing and composition with filters on and 'T' speed means you don't even need a shutter release.
Here's one from the last time I had...Show more →
So beautiful, Heron!
_________________________________________________
Spring blossoms at Washington Park Arboretum, Seattle
Fuji Velvia 50 4x5
Jan 16, 2025 at 10:41 AM
p.1407 #4Post your recent film shots!
bjhurley wrote:
Canon P, Voigtländer Color-Skopar 35/2.5 LTM, Fomapan 100 (at EI 50). This is the first roll of film I've developed myself since about 1971; the tech at the lab where I bought my equipment said it would be like riding a bicycle, it would all come back to me, but she was wrong...it was a stressful experience but it all worked out in the end.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54269146559_c1f2fd0c09_c.jpgOld cottonwood by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54269790620_06d2566424_c.jpgsnow walker by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54269614459_05d6a6b440_c.jpgskier on the bridge by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54269614449_9c410e6ac1_c.jpgno swimming by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Congratulations! In 2018, I developed my own film for the first time since 1976 and have learned so much since. The biggest advantage now is the instant read thermometer. Loading the tank and laying out your workflow will get easier. Which developer did you use?
Jan 16, 2025 at 10:46 AM
p.1407 #5Post your recent film shots!
madNbad wrote:
Congratulations! In 2018, I developed my own film for the first time since 1976 and have learned so much since. The biggest advantage now is the instant read thermometer. Loading the tank and laying out your workflow will get easier. Which developer did you use?
I used Ilfosol 3 since I had a sample pack; I developed at 1+9 for 4.5 minutes. My goal for Foma 100 (and 400) is to do semi-stand in Rodinal, as I really like the images I've seen with that approach, especially for Foma 100. But first I have to get my hands on some Rodinal. Here in Canada it's often sold as Blazinal, same formula, although it (as well as Rodinal) are often out of stock. Apparently Rodinal was originally meant to be used at 18 degrees C not 20, and the reports I've seen from users online indicate that it makes a big difference, particularly with respect to grain (with larger grain at 20C). That's good for me since my basement (where I'll be developing film) is 14-15 degrees C all year round. Upstairs it can get really warm in summer. I'll probably put the tank in a water bath in a picnic cooler and let the thermal inertia of water maintain roughly the same temp for semi-stand development.
I don't plan to do C-41 and if I shoot anything important in B&W I'll probably still bring it to the lab until I have more confidence in myself, but it's a start!
One of my big lessons was to print out the instructions and to use an actual standalone timer. I used my phone for the timer and the screen kept going to sleep; waking it was a bit of a chore wearing rubber gloves. Same for the instructions; I wrote them out step by step and had them on a tablet but it kept falling asleep just when I needed to refer to the list for the next step.
Congratulations! In 2018, I developed my own film for the first time since 1976 and have learned so much since. The biggest advantage now is the instant read thermometer. Loading the tank and laying out your workflow will get easier. Which developer did you use?
I used Ilfosol 3 since I had a sample pack; I developed at 1+9 for 4.5 minutes. My goal for Foma 100 (and 400) is to do semi-stand in Rodinal, as I really like the images I've seen with that approach, especially for Foma 100. But first I have to get my hands on some Rodinal. Here in Canada it's often sold as Blazinal, same formula, although it (as well as Rodinal) are often out of stock. Apparently Rodinal was originally meant to be used at 18 degrees C not 20, and the reports I've seen from users online indicate that it makes a big difference, particularly with respect to grain (with larger grain at 20C). That's good for me since my basement (where I'll be developing film) is 14-15 degrees C all year round. Upstairs it can get really warm in summer. I'll probably put the tank in a water bath in a picnic cooler and let the thermal inertia of water maintain roughly the same temp for semi-stand development.
I don't plan to do C-41 and if I shoot anything important in B&W I'll probably still bring it to the lab until I have more confidence in myself, but it's a start!
One of my big lessons was to print out the instructions and to use an actual standalone timer. I used my phone for the timer and the screen kept going to sleep; waking it was a bit of a chore wearing rubber gloves. Same for the instructions; I wrote them out step by step and had them on a tablet but it kept falling asleep just when I needed to refer to the list for the next step.
Jan 16, 2025 at 11:04 AM
p.1407 #6Post your recent film shots!
I have suggested it many times but if you are going to use a liquid developer, get an oral syringe from a local pharmacy. It makes getting just the right amount of developer a lot easier.
Jan 16, 2025 at 11:36 AM
p.1407 #7Post your recent film shots!
Ross Martin wrote:
Seeing all the big Fuji images posted lately has me itching to take out my GSW690II again.
I was recently on the fence about selling it and cashing in on the increase in price since I bought it 5 years ago (paid $500 with 16 on the counter), but I've decided to keep it for now. I don't shoot it much, but nothing else I have matches it for very long exposures with ND filters. Rangefinder allows framing and composition with filters on and 'T' speed means you don't even need a shutter release.
Here's one from the last time I had it out about a year ago, around 15 minutes on Acros II.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53413773725_ce66864c8d_c.jpgSo beautiful, Heron!
_________________________________________________
Spring blossoms at Washington Park Arboretum, Seattle
Fuji Velvia 50 4x5
Great shot! It reminds me of Van Gogh's Almon Blossoms. It has so much details to look up. May I ask how did you scan it?
OregonSun wrote
Sonnar-7 wrote
So many Fuji GW690.I was recently on the fence about selling it and cashing in on the increase in price since I bought it 5 years ago (paid $500 with 16 on the counter), but I've decided to keep it for now. I don't shoot it much, but nothing else I have matches it for very long exposures with ND filters. Rangefinder allows framing and composition with filters on and 'T' speed means you don't even need a shutter release.
Here's one from the last time I had it out about a year ago, around 15 minutes on Acros II.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53413773725_ce66864c8d_c.jpg
_________________________________________________
Spring blossoms at Washington Park Arboretum, Seattle
Fuji Velvia 50 4x5
Great shot! It reminds me of Van Gogh's Almon Blossoms. It has so much details to look up. May I ask how did you scan it?
Jan 16, 2025 at 11:44 AM
p.1407 #8Post your recent film shots!
lifeandmylens wrote:
A dozen or so recent shots from the past few days. Nikon F6 + 28/1.4AFD, 58/1.2AIS, 300/2.8D. 250D, 200T & 500T. Hope everyone is safe!
Such a beautiful, heartwarming set!
A dozen or so recent shots from the past few days. Nikon F6 + 28/1.4AFD, 58/1.2AIS, 300/2.8D. 250D, 200T & 500T. Hope everyone is safe!
Such a beautiful, heartwarming set!
Jan 16, 2025 at 11:52 AM
p.1407 #9Post your recent film shots!
OffTrail wrote:
Agfa Isolette II
Solinar 75mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54255664044_81ee05a62c_c.jpg..wow - can't recall ever getting lush greens like that from Portra 800 - very nice 🙂
Isolette rendering very nice as well it seems, quite "gentle" 👍Portra 800 can bring the greens.
Pretty sure I've posted these before, but both Pentax 67 and 105 f/2.4. I like this film stock a lot in 35mm, but it comes alive in 120.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53742573579_fb3f2a9c80_c.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54259358584_ec83dcb968_c.jpg
Delicious rendering! I used to shoot with Pentax 67 and have had one in my eBay cart for awhile trying to decide if I want to return. I am craving me some Velvia chromes, but I may also try Portra if I get the MF cam (I have Portra 800 in my FM2 now).
Tina Kino wrote
OregonSun wrote
Portra 800Agfa Isolette II
Solinar 75mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54255664044_81ee05a62c_c.jpg
Isolette rendering very nice as well it seems, quite "gentle" 👍
Pretty sure I've posted these before, but both Pentax 67 and 105 f/2.4. I like this film stock a lot in 35mm, but it comes alive in 120.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53742573579_fb3f2a9c80_c.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54259358584_ec83dcb968_c.jpg
Delicious rendering! I used to shoot with Pentax 67 and have had one in my eBay cart for awhile trying to decide if I want to return. I am craving me some Velvia chromes, but I may also try Portra if I get the MF cam (I have Portra 800 in my FM2 now).
Jan 16, 2025 at 11:59 AM
p.1407 #10Post your recent film shots!
jackalooope wrote:
Seeing all the big Fuji images posted lately has me itching to take out my GSW690II again.
I was recently on the fence about selling it and cashing in on the increase in price since I bought it 5 years ago (paid $500 with 16 on the counter), but I've decided to keep it for now. I don't shoot it much, but nothing else I have matches it for very long exposures with ND filters. Rangefinder allows framing and composition with filters on and 'T' speed means you don't even need a shutter release.
Here's one from the last time I had it out about a year ago, around 15 minutes on Acros II.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53413773725_ce66864c8d_c.jpgSo beautiful, Heron!
_________________________________________________
Spring blossoms at Washington Park Arboretum, Seattle
Fuji Velvia 50 4x5Great shot! It reminds me of Van Gogh's Almon Blossoms. It has so much details to look up. May I ask how did you scan it?
Thank you! This is a Heidelberg Tango drum scan from what was then called West Coast Imaging, they cost $50 each for 200mb 16-bit at that time.
Edited on Jan 16, 2025 at 12:31 PM · View previous versions
Ross Martin wrote
OregonSun wrote
Sonnar-7 wrote
So many Fuji GW690.I was recently on the fence about selling it and cashing in on the increase in price since I bought it 5 years ago (paid $500 with 16 on the counter), but I've decided to keep it for now. I don't shoot it much, but nothing else I have matches it for very long exposures with ND filters. Rangefinder allows framing and composition with filters on and 'T' speed means you don't even need a shutter release.
Here's one from the last time I had it out about a year ago, around 15 minutes on Acros II.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53413773725_ce66864c8d_c.jpg
_________________________________________________
Spring blossoms at Washington Park Arboretum, Seattle
Fuji Velvia 50 4x5
Thank you! This is a Heidelberg Tango drum scan from what was then called West Coast Imaging, they cost $50 each for 200mb 16-bit at that time.
Edited on Jan 16, 2025 at 12:31 PM · View previous versions
Jan 16, 2025 at 12:05 PM
|
p.1407 #11Post your recent film shots!
theHUN wrote:
I did a very rough comparison between Delta 400, Tmax 400, HP5 and Tri-X with the result that HP5 gave me an actual film speed of ISO400, while the others were slower. That was good enough for me to make it my default ISO400 film. I find it classy enough, but perhaps that's because I am using it in 120 size. Also, once I started loving the grain in other peoples' images, I tried to embrace it in my own, and I have mostly succeeded.
For fine grain I either use Acros or digital.In which developer?Rodinal.You generally lose about a stop with Rodinal.
Best HP5 + Rodinal combo I've tried is 1+75 at 14 minutes. (at 400)That was my expectation too, and it is consistent with both Acros and FP4 giving me half box speed (at 1+75, 15 min). But HP5 in Rodinal 1+60, 20 min, actually gave me ISO400.
https://geza.zenfolio.com/img/s/v-10/p604621648-5.jpg
Ah, I'm going to have to try your dilution/time. I've struggled to get "decent" contrast from HP5, it's usually too flat for me, and the 1+75 dilution is working well for me. (This was a recommendation from Popular Photography magazine in 1979). The other good results I've gotten from HP5 have been in Diafine, but at 800.
What sort of agitation are you doing? I've found gentle to be key with Rodinal.
Oldwino wrote
theHUN wrote
Oldwino wrote
theHUN wrote
Tina Kino wrote
... I want something that looks a bit more "classy" / elegant than HP5, and Tri-X 400 ...For fine grain I either use Acros or digital.
Best HP5 + Rodinal combo I've tried is 1+75 at 14 minutes. (at 400)
https://geza.zenfolio.com/img/s/v-10/p604621648-5.jpg
Ah, I'm going to have to try your dilution/time. I've struggled to get "decent" contrast from HP5, it's usually too flat for me, and the 1+75 dilution is working well for me. (This was a recommendation from Popular Photography magazine in 1979). The other good results I've gotten from HP5 have been in Diafine, but at 800.
What sort of agitation are you doing? I've found gentle to be key with Rodinal.
Jan 16, 2025 at 12:21 PM
p.1407 #12Post your recent film shots!
Oldwino wrote:
For fine grain I either use Acros or digital.In which developer?Rodinal.You generally lose about a stop with Rodinal.
Best HP5 + Rodinal combo I've tried is 1+75 at 14 minutes. (at 400)That was my expectation too, and it is consistent with both Acros and FP4 giving me half box speed (at 1+75, 15 min). But HP5 in Rodinal 1+60, 20 min, actually gave me ISO400.
https://geza.zenfolio.com/img/s/v-10/p604621648-5.jpgAh, I'm going to have to try your dilution/time. I've struggled to get "decent" contrast from HP5, it's usually too flat for me, and the 1+75 dilution is working well for me. (This was a recommendation from Popular Photography magazine in 1979). The other good results I've gotten from HP5 have been in Diafine, but at 800.
What sort of agitation are you doing? I've found gentle to be key with Rodinal.
I'm not quite sure what @theHUN will recommend but a suggestion from another forum has yielded good results:
Initially, 30 seconds of continuous, very gentle agitation followed by 3 gentle inversions every minute.
It really helped to reduce the grain and nice even tones across the negative.
Pumpkins
Pentax Espio 628, HP5+, Rodinal 50:1
Edited on Jan 16, 2025 at 12:47 PM · View previous versions
theHUN wrote
Oldwino wrote
theHUN wrote
Oldwino wrote
theHUN wrote
I did a very rough comparison between Delta 400, Tmax 400, HP5 and Tri-X with the result that HP5 gave me an actual film speed of ISO400, while the others were slower. That was good enough for me to make it my default ISO400 film. I find it classy enough, but perhaps that's because I am using it in 120 size. Also, once I started loving the grain in other peoples' images, I tried to embrace it in my own, and I have mostly succeeded.For fine grain I either use Acros or digital.
Best HP5 + Rodinal combo I've tried is 1+75 at 14 minutes. (at 400)
https://geza.zenfolio.com/img/s/v-10/p604621648-5.jpg
What sort of agitation are you doing? I've found gentle to be key with Rodinal.
I'm not quite sure what @theHUN will recommend but a suggestion from another forum has yielded good results:
Initially, 30 seconds of continuous, very gentle agitation followed by 3 gentle inversions every minute.
It really helped to reduce the grain and nice even tones across the negative.
Pumpkins
Pentax Espio 628, HP5+, Rodinal 50:1
Edited on Jan 16, 2025 at 12:47 PM · View previous versions
Jan 16, 2025 at 12:43 PM
p.1407 #13Post your recent film shots!
Ross Martin wrote:
Seeing all the big Fuji images posted lately has me itching to take out my GSW690II again.
I was recently on the fence about selling it and cashing in on the increase in price since I bought it 5 years ago (paid $500 with 16 on the counter), but I've decided to keep it for now. I don't shoot it much, but nothing else I have matches it for very long exposures with ND filters. Rangefinder allows framing and composition with filters on and 'T' speed means you don't even need a shutter release.
Here's one from the last time I had it out about a year ago, around 15 minutes on Acros II.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53413773725_ce66864c8d_c.jpgSo beautiful, Heron!
_________________________________________________
Spring blossoms at Washington Park Arboretum, Seattle
Fuji Velvia 50 4x5Great shot! It reminds me of Van Gogh's Almon Blossoms. It has so much details to look up. May I ask how did you scan it?Thank you! This is a Heidelberg Tango drum scan from what was then called West Coast Imaging, they cost $50 each for 200mb 16-bit at that time.
Definitely worth it. I did some research on the drum scans, and it's amazing to learn they can go up to 5k dpi for 4x5 with files as large as 2GB--absolutely a beast for digitizing film.
jackalooope wrote
Ross Martin wrote
OregonSun wrote
Sonnar-7 wrote
So many Fuji GW690.I was recently on the fence about selling it and cashing in on the increase in price since I bought it 5 years ago (paid $500 with 16 on the counter), but I've decided to keep it for now. I don't shoot it much, but nothing else I have matches it for very long exposures with ND filters. Rangefinder allows framing and composition with filters on and 'T' speed means you don't even need a shutter release.
Here's one from the last time I had it out about a year ago, around 15 minutes on Acros II.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53413773725_ce66864c8d_c.jpg
_________________________________________________
Spring blossoms at Washington Park Arboretum, Seattle
Fuji Velvia 50 4x5
Definitely worth it. I did some research on the drum scans, and it's amazing to learn they can go up to 5k dpi for 4x5 with files as large as 2GB--absolutely a beast for digitizing film.
Jan 16, 2025 at 12:43 PM
p.1407 #14Post your recent film shots!
Oldwino wrote:
What sort of agitation are you doing?
I used to do 4 gentle inversions (8-10 seconds) at the start of each minute plus a firm tap as I put the tank down again to dislodge bubbles. But I have been seeing some defects at the film borders (see: https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/water-spotting-on-film-edges.210908/) which are consistent with bubbles, so I am moving back to using a Simma sine wave roller to see if this resolves the issue. So far I have only recharacterized the speed/contrast of Acros and FP4. HP5 and a test roll are next. Fingers crossed the issue gets resolved.
What sort of agitation are you doing?
I used to do 4 gentle inversions (8-10 seconds) at the start of each minute plus a firm tap as I put the tank down again to dislodge bubbles. But I have been seeing some defects at the film borders (see: https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/water-spotting-on-film-edges.210908/) which are consistent with bubbles, so I am moving back to using a Simma sine wave roller to see if this resolves the issue. So far I have only recharacterized the speed/contrast of Acros and FP4. HP5 and a test roll are next. Fingers crossed the issue gets resolved.
Jan 16, 2025 at 01:00 PM
p.1407 #17Post your recent film shots!
theHUN wrote:
I used to do 4 gentle inversions (8-10 seconds) at the start of each minute plus a firm tap as I put the tank down again to dislodge bubbles. But I have been seeing some defects at the film borders (see: https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/water-spotting-on-film-edges.210908/) which are consistent with bubbles, so I am moving back to using a Simma sine wave roller to see if this resolves the issue. So far I have only recharacterized the speed/contrast of Acros and FP4. HP5 and a test roll are next. Fingers crossed the issue gets resolved.
I haven't seen anyone here using the Ars-Imago Lab Box. I have two, one for 35mm and the other for 120. I love being able to load it without a changing bag or dark room. I've been successful with B&W and C-41 (and even ECN-2). For B&W, I'm still working out the agitation but current practice is to rotate the reel with the crank 5 times, rock the lab box side to side once and then tap twice each 30 seconds. Some emulsions still come out with more grain than I hoped but I'll keep trying. Been using Ilfotec DD-x and recently ID-11. I prefer the latter for finer grain results with low ISO films.
Oldwino wrote
What sort of agitation are you doing?I haven't seen anyone here using the Ars-Imago Lab Box. I have two, one for 35mm and the other for 120. I love being able to load it without a changing bag or dark room. I've been successful with B&W and C-41 (and even ECN-2). For B&W, I'm still working out the agitation but current practice is to rotate the reel with the crank 5 times, rock the lab box side to side once and then tap twice each 30 seconds. Some emulsions still come out with more grain than I hoped but I'll keep trying. Been using Ilfotec DD-x and recently ID-11. I prefer the latter for finer grain results with low ISO films.
Jan 16, 2025 at 01:56 PM
p.1407 #18Post your recent film shots!
Ross Martin wrote:
Agfa Isolette II
Solinar 75mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54255664044_81ee05a62c_c.jpg..wow - can't recall ever getting lush greens like that from Portra 800 - very nice 🙂
Isolette rendering very nice as well it seems, quite "gentle" 👍Portra 800 can bring the greens.
Pretty sure I've posted these before, but both Pentax 67 and 105 f/2.4. I like this film stock a lot in 35mm, but it comes alive in 120.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53742573579_fb3f2a9c80_c.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54259358584_ec83dcb968_c.jpgDelicious rendering! I used to shoot with Pentax 67 and have had one in my eBay cart for awhile trying to decide if I want to return. I am craving me some Velvia chromes, but I may also try Portra if I get the MF cam (I have Portra 800 in my FM2 now).
Do itttt! Most of the 67's lenses are still surprisingly inexpensive, so it strikes me as a great 120 system to buy into right now. I've not shot any slide film in mine, but I have some 6x6 slides and they're awesome to look at on a light pad. Probably nothing like looking at 4x5 or larger, though!
OffTrail wrote
Tina Kino wrote
OregonSun wrote
Portra 800Agfa Isolette II
Solinar 75mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54255664044_81ee05a62c_c.jpg
Isolette rendering very nice as well it seems, quite "gentle" 👍
Pretty sure I've posted these before, but both Pentax 67 and 105 f/2.4. I like this film stock a lot in 35mm, but it comes alive in 120.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53742573579_fb3f2a9c80_c.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54259358584_ec83dcb968_c.jpg
Do itttt! Most of the 67's lenses are still surprisingly inexpensive, so it strikes me as a great 120 system to buy into right now. I've not shot any slide film in mine, but I have some 6x6 slides and they're awesome to look at on a light pad. Probably nothing like looking at 4x5 or larger, though!
Jan 16, 2025 at 02:01 PM
p.1407 #19Post your recent film shots!
OffTrail wrote:
Agfa Isolette II
Solinar 75mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54255664044_81ee05a62c_c.jpg..wow - can't recall ever getting lush greens like that from Portra 800 - very nice 🙂
Isolette rendering very nice as well it seems, quite "gentle" 👍Portra 800 can bring the greens.
Pretty sure I've posted these before, but both Pentax 67 and 105 f/2.4. I like this film stock a lot in 35mm, but it comes alive in 120.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53742573579_fb3f2a9c80_c.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54259358584_ec83dcb968_c.jpgDelicious rendering! I used to shoot with Pentax 67 and have had one in my eBay cart for awhile trying to decide if I want to return. I am craving me some Velvia chromes, but I may also try Portra if I get the MF cam (I have Portra 800 in my FM2 now).Do itttt! Most of the 67's lenses are still surprisingly inexpensive, so it strikes me as a great 120 system to buy into right now. I've not shot any slide film in mine, but I have some 6x6 slides and they're awesome to look at on a light pad. Probably nothing like looking at 4x5 or larger, though!
Thanks for the encouragement
I considered adding 4x5 back in but honestly it’s too much hassle and aggravation for how I shoot now. The P67 is just much faster/easier to use in the field, especially due to roll film and being able to cost effectively bracket when shooting Velvia.
Ross Martin wrote
OffTrail wrote
Tina Kino wrote
OregonSun wrote
Portra 800Agfa Isolette II
Solinar 75mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54255664044_81ee05a62c_c.jpg
Isolette rendering very nice as well it seems, quite "gentle" 👍
Pretty sure I've posted these before, but both Pentax 67 and 105 f/2.4. I like this film stock a lot in 35mm, but it comes alive in 120.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53742573579_fb3f2a9c80_c.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54259358584_ec83dcb968_c.jpg
Thanks for the encouragement
I considered adding 4x5 back in but honestly it’s too much hassle and aggravation for how I shoot now. The P67 is just much faster/easier to use in the field, especially due to roll film and being able to cost effectively bracket when shooting Velvia. Jan 16, 2025 at 03:00 PM
p.1407 #20Post your recent film shots!
Ross Martin wrote:
OffTrail wrote
Ross Martin wrote
OffTrail wrote
Tina Kino wrote
OregonSun wrote
Portra 800Agfa Isolette II
Solinar 75mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54255664044_81ee05a62c_c.jpg
Isolette rendering very nice as well it seems, quite "gentle" 👍
Pretty sure I've posted these before, but both Pentax 67 and 105 f/2.4. I like this film stock a lot in 35mm, but it comes alive in 120.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53742573579_fb3f2a9c80_c.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54259358584_ec83dcb968_c.jpg
I considered adding 4x5 back in but honestly it’s too much hassle and aggravation for how I shoot now. The P67 is just much faster/easier to use in the field, especially due to roll film and being able to cost effectively bracket when shooting Velvia. Love my 67! It was the first cam I got when I started shooting film again 10 years ago. Lately I've been using it with a 35mm Xpan adapter, which is really fun.
Jan 16, 2025 at 03:03 PM