Post your recent film shots!
p.1406 #1Post your recent film shots!
Fuji GW690 III + Portra 400 + Cinestill C-41
Jan 15, 2025 at 02:16 PM
p.1406 #2Post your recent film shots!
I love my Fuji GW690II. The rangefinder patch is a bit dim/low contrast, but I'd bet that if I could find somebody to service it, it would be much clearer. My only gripe...the negatives are too huge for my situation. With my scanning set-up I have to pano stitch together 12 images to get everything. The upshot is the scans are gigantic.
Drying Barrel Staves by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Matt of Oregon Barrel Works by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Fuji GW690II, Kodak Portra 800.
Oregon Barrel Works by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Rick DeFerarri - Owner Oregon Barrel Works by Jim Fischer, on Flickr
Fuji GW690II, Ilford Delta 3200, Rodinal 1:50
Drying Barrel Staves by Jim Fischer, on FlickrMatt of Oregon Barrel Works by Jim Fischer, on FlickrFuji GW690II, Kodak Portra 800.
Oregon Barrel Works by Jim Fischer, on FlickrRick DeFerarri - Owner Oregon Barrel Works by Jim Fischer, on FlickrFuji GW690II, Ilford Delta 3200, Rodinal 1:50
Jan 15, 2025 at 02:34 PM
p.1406 #3Post your recent film shots!
So many Fuji GW690.
Fuji GW690 II & Lomography 400
Jan 15, 2025 at 02:49 PM
p.1406 #4Post your recent film shots!
Bought a camera with a roll of what I thought was Portra 160 in it and 8 pictures taken. Thought I'd continue to shoot on it and process it to see what was on it. After I finished the roll I saw it was Portra 160 NC. What is that 20 year old film?
I shot it at EI 100 and processed via ECN-2. Anyway I obviously underexposed it and cross processed it to boot. And even abused it with remjet remover solution. But still turned out legible considering.
FM3a + 58/1.2 and 35/1.4.
I shot it at EI 100 and processed via ECN-2. Anyway I obviously underexposed it and cross processed it to boot. And even abused it with remjet remover solution. But still turned out legible considering.
FM3a + 58/1.2 and 35/1.4.
Jan 15, 2025 at 03:03 PM
p.1406 #5Post your recent film shots!
Sonnar-7 wrote:
So many Fuji GW690.
Seeing all the big Fuji images posted lately has me itching to take out my GSW690II again.
I was recently on the fence about selling it and cashing in on the increase in price since I bought it 5 years ago (paid $500 with 16 on the counter), but I've decided to keep it for now. I don't shoot it much, but nothing else I have matches it for very long exposures with ND filters. Rangefinder allows framing and composition with filters on and 'T' speed means you don't even need a shutter release.
Here's one from the last time I had it out about a year ago, around 15 minutes on Acros II.
So many Fuji GW690.
Seeing all the big Fuji images posted lately has me itching to take out my GSW690II again.
I was recently on the fence about selling it and cashing in on the increase in price since I bought it 5 years ago (paid $500 with 16 on the counter), but I've decided to keep it for now. I don't shoot it much, but nothing else I have matches it for very long exposures with ND filters. Rangefinder allows framing and composition with filters on and 'T' speed means you don't even need a shutter release.
Here's one from the last time I had it out about a year ago, around 15 minutes on Acros II.
Jan 15, 2025 at 03:11 PM
p.1406 #6Post your recent film shots!
OregonSun wrote:
Seeing all the big Fuji images posted lately has me itching to take out my GSW690II again.
I was recently on the fence about selling it and cashing in on the increase in price since I bought it 5 years ago (paid $500 with 16 on the counter), but I've decided to keep it for now. I don't shoot it much, but nothing else I have matches it for very long exposures with ND filters. Rangefinder allows framing and composition with filters on and 'T' speed means you don't even need a shutter release.
Here's one from the last time I had...Show more →
I was looking for some medium format to try my hands at something new and it has a special look(Medium format I mean) sometimes and I wanted that too.
The Fuji 690 II or III( I wanted a III but couldn’t find one) felt as a noob quite a bargain considering as much as it felt more portable than most. After having taken it for a spin it confirmed that it’s more light and easy to carry than I even had anticipated.
I don’t have a clear idea about it yet but for a medium format camera, it has some advantages and it is beautiful.
My Gojira Leica.
Sonnar-7 wrote
So many Fuji GW690.I was recently on the fence about selling it and cashing in on the increase in price since I bought it 5 years ago (paid $500 with 16 on the counter), but I've decided to keep it for now. I don't shoot it much, but nothing else I have matches it for very long exposures with ND filters. Rangefinder allows framing and composition with filters on and 'T' speed means you don't even need a shutter release.
Here's one from the last time I had...Show more →
I was looking for some medium format to try my hands at something new and it has a special look(Medium format I mean) sometimes and I wanted that too.
The Fuji 690 II or III( I wanted a III but couldn’t find one) felt as a noob quite a bargain considering as much as it felt more portable than most. After having taken it for a spin it confirmed that it’s more light and easy to carry than I even had anticipated.
I don’t have a clear idea about it yet but for a medium format camera, it has some advantages and it is beautiful.
My Gojira Leica.
Jan 15, 2025 at 03:19 PM
p.1406 #7Post your recent film shots!
OregonSun wrote:
Seeing all the big Fuji images posted lately has me itching to take out my GSW690II again.
I was recently on the fence about selling it and cashing in on the increase in price since I bought it 5 years ago (paid $500 with 16 on the counter), but I've decided to keep it for now. I don't shoot it much, but nothing else I have matches it for very long exposures with ND filters. Rangefinder allows framing and composition with filters on and 'T' speed means you don't even need a shutter release.
Here's one from the last time I had...Show more →
Beautiful!
Sonnar-7 wrote
So many Fuji GW690.I was recently on the fence about selling it and cashing in on the increase in price since I bought it 5 years ago (paid $500 with 16 on the counter), but I've decided to keep it for now. I don't shoot it much, but nothing else I have matches it for very long exposures with ND filters. Rangefinder allows framing and composition with filters on and 'T' speed means you don't even need a shutter release.
Here's one from the last time I had...Show more →
Beautiful!
Jan 15, 2025 at 03:21 PM
p.1406 #8Post your recent film shots!
Glad to see so many others enjoying their Texas Leicas. Only my second roll and already I'm loving this monster.
Fuji GW690 III + Portra 400
Fuji GW690 III + Portra 400
Jan 15, 2025 at 03:29 PM
p.1406 #9Post your recent film shots!
Keeping the Barnack part of my brain in shape...
Leica IIIa / CV Nokton 50f1.5 / Delta 100
Leica IIIa / CV Nokton 50f1.5 / Delta 100
Jan 15, 2025 at 03:35 PM
p.1406 #10Post your recent film shots!
Addiction Aquatic Development, Zhongshan District, Taipei City.
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2023.11.26 Roll #345-08447-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2023.11.26 Roll #345-08447-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Jan 15, 2025 at 06:00 PM
|
p.1406 #11Post your recent film shots!
Tina Kino wrote:
... I want something that looks a bit more "classy" / elegant than HP5, and Tri-X 400 ...
I did a very rough comparison between Delta 400, Tmax 400, HP5 and Tri-X with the result that HP5 gave me an actual film speed of ISO400, while the others were slower. That was good enough for me to make it my default ISO400 film. I find it classy enough, but perhaps that's because I am using it in 120 size. Also, once I started loving the grain in other peoples' images, I tried to embrace it in my own, and I have mostly succeeded.
For fine grain I either use Acros or digital.
... I want something that looks a bit more "classy" / elegant than HP5, and Tri-X 400 ...
I did a very rough comparison between Delta 400, Tmax 400, HP5 and Tri-X with the result that HP5 gave me an actual film speed of ISO400, while the others were slower. That was good enough for me to make it my default ISO400 film. I find it classy enough, but perhaps that's because I am using it in 120 size. Also, once I started loving the grain in other peoples' images, I tried to embrace it in my own, and I have mostly succeeded.
For fine grain I either use Acros or digital.
Jan 15, 2025 at 08:43 PM
p.1406 #13Post your recent film shots!
One more for tonight . . .
Fuji GW690 III + Portra 400
Fuji GW690 III + Portra 400
Jan 15, 2025 at 09:14 PM
p.1406 #14Post your recent film shots!
theHUN wrote:
I did a very rough comparison between Delta 400, Tmax 400, HP5 and Tri-X with the result that HP5 gave me an actual film speed of ISO400, while the others were slower. That was good enough for me to make it my default ISO400 film. I find it classy enough, but perhaps that's because I am using it in 120 size. Also, once I started loving the grain in other peoples' images, I tried to embrace it in my own, and I have mostly succeeded.
For fine grain I either use Acros or digital.
In which developer?
Tina Kino wrote
... I want something that looks a bit more "classy" / elegant than HP5, and Tri-X 400 ...For fine grain I either use Acros or digital.
In which developer?
Jan 15, 2025 at 09:32 PM
p.1406 #15Post your recent film shots!
theHUN wrote:
I did a very rough comparison between Delta 400, Tmax 400, HP5 and Tri-X with the result that HP5 gave me an actual film speed of ISO400, while the others were slower. That was good enough for me to make it my default ISO400 film. I find it classy enough, but perhaps that's because I am using it in 120 size. Also, once I started loving the grain in other peoples' images, I tried to embrace it in my own, and I have mostly succeeded.
For fine grain I either use Acros or digital.
Thanks for your feedback!
I've read many conflicting things about the true film speed of Tri-X, I'm curious what I'll find with my own tests 🙂
And yes, I think everything looks more classy in 120 💁♂️
Would love to see some of the Acros pictures!
I did a very rough comparison between Delta 400, Tmax 400, HP5 and Tri-X with the result that HP5 gave me an actual film speed of ISO400, while the others were slower. That was good enough for me to make it my default ISO400 film. I find it classy enough, but perhaps that's because I am using it in 120 size. Also, once I started loving the grain in other peoples' images, I tried to embrace it in my own, and I have mostly succeeded.
For fine grain I either use Acros or digital.
Thanks for your feedback!
I've read many conflicting things about the true film speed of Tri-X, I'm curious what I'll find with my own tests 🙂
And yes, I think everything looks more classy in 120 💁♂️
Would love to see some of the Acros pictures!
Jan 16, 2025 at 01:45 AM
p.1406 #16Post your recent film shots!
Canon P, Voigtländer Color-Skopar 35/2.5 LTM, Fomapan 100 (at EI 50). This is the first roll of film I've developed myself since about 1971; the tech at the lab where I bought my equipment said it would be like riding a bicycle, it would all come back to me, but she was wrong...it was a stressful experience but it all worked out in the end.
Old cottonwood by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
snow walker by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
skier on the bridge by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
no swimming by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Old cottonwood by Brad Hurley, on Flickrsnow walker by Brad Hurley, on Flickrskier on the bridge by Brad Hurley, on Flickrno swimming by Brad Hurley, on FlickrJan 16, 2025 at 04:23 AM
p.1406 #17Post your recent film shots!
Fuji GW690
Portra 400
Cinestill C-41
Portra 400
Cinestill C-41
Jan 16, 2025 at 07:26 AM
p.1406 #18Post your recent film shots!
Oldwino wrote:
I did a very rough comparison between Delta 400, Tmax 400, HP5 and Tri-X with the result that HP5 gave me an actual film speed of ISO400, while the others were slower. That was good enough for me to make it my default ISO400 film. I find it classy enough, but perhaps that's because I am using it in 120 size. Also, once I started loving the grain in other peoples' images, I tried to embrace it in my own, and I have mostly succeeded.
For fine grain I either use Acros or digital.In which developer?
Rodinal.
theHUN wrote
Tina Kino wrote
... I want something that looks a bit more "classy" / elegant than HP5, and Tri-X 400 ...For fine grain I either use Acros or digital.
Rodinal.
Jan 16, 2025 at 07:42 AM
p.1406 #19Post your recent film shots!
theHUN wrote:
I did a very rough comparison between Delta 400, Tmax 400, HP5 and Tri-X with the result that HP5 gave me an actual film speed of ISO400, while the others were slower. That was good enough for me to make it my default ISO400 film. I find it classy enough, but perhaps that's because I am using it in 120 size. Also, once I started loving the grain in other peoples' images, I tried to embrace it in my own, and I have mostly succeeded.
For fine grain I either use Acros or digital.In which developer?Rodinal.
You generally lose about a stop with Rodinal.
Best HP5 + Rodinal combo I've tried is 1+75 at 14 minutes. (at 400)
Oldwino wrote
theHUN wrote
Tina Kino wrote
... I want something that looks a bit more "classy" / elegant than HP5, and Tri-X 400 ...For fine grain I either use Acros or digital.
You generally lose about a stop with Rodinal.
Best HP5 + Rodinal combo I've tried is 1+75 at 14 minutes. (at 400)
Jan 16, 2025 at 08:57 AM
