Post your recent film shots!
p.1408 #1Post your recent film shots!
Ross Martin wrote:
Agfa Isolette II
Solinar 75mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54255664044_81ee05a62c_c.jpg..wow - can't recall ever getting lush greens like that from Portra 800 - very nice 🙂
Isolette rendering very nice as well it seems, quite "gentle" 👍Portra 800 can bring the greens.
Pretty sure I've posted these before, but both Pentax 67 and 105 f/2.4. I like this film stock a lot in 35mm, but it comes alive in 120.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53742573579_fb3f2a9c80_c.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54259358584_ec83dcb968_c.jpgDelicious rendering! I used to shoot with Pentax 67 and have had one in my eBay cart for awhile trying to decide if I want to return. I am craving me some Velvia chromes, but I may also try Portra if I get the MF cam (I have Portra 800 in my FM2 now).
I miss my Pentax 67! Shouldn't have sold it. Mamiya 7 is more practical, but the Pentax was more fun. I'm starting to think Huss is onto something, never selling cameras haha.
OffTrail wrote
Tina Kino wrote
OregonSun wrote
Portra 800Agfa Isolette II
Solinar 75mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54255664044_81ee05a62c_c.jpg
Isolette rendering very nice as well it seems, quite "gentle" 👍
Pretty sure I've posted these before, but both Pentax 67 and 105 f/2.4. I like this film stock a lot in 35mm, but it comes alive in 120.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53742573579_fb3f2a9c80_c.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54259358584_ec83dcb968_c.jpg
I miss my Pentax 67! Shouldn't have sold it. Mamiya 7 is more practical, but the Pentax was more fun. I'm starting to think Huss is onto something, never selling cameras haha.
Jan 16, 2025 at 03:15 PM
p.1408 #2Post your recent film shots!
Ross Martin wrote:
Agfa Isolette II
Solinar 75mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54255664044_81ee05a62c_c.jpg..wow - can't recall ever getting lush greens like that from Portra 800 - very nice 🙂
Isolette rendering very nice as well it seems, quite "gentle" 👍Portra 800 can bring the greens.
Pretty sure I've posted these before, but both Pentax 67 and 105 f/2.4. I like this film stock a lot in 35mm, but it comes alive in 120.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53742573579_fb3f2a9c80_c.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54259358584_ec83dcb968_c.jpgDelicious rendering! I used to shoot with Pentax 67 and have had one in my eBay cart for awhile trying to decide if I want to return. I am craving me some Velvia chromes, but I may also try Portra if I get the MF cam (I have Portra 800 in my FM2 now).Do itttt! Most of the 67's lenses are still surprisingly inexpensive, so it strikes me as a great 120 system to buy into right now. I've not shot any slide film in mine, but I have some 6x6 slides and they're awesome to look at on a light pad. Probably nothing like looking at 4x5 or larger, though!Thanks for the encouragement 
I considered adding 4x5 back in but honestly it’s too much hassle and aggravation for how I shoot now. The P67 is just much faster/easier to use in the field, especially due to roll film and being able to cost effectively bracket when shooting Velvia.
Yeah, when I wanted a bigger negative than 35mm, 6x7 seemed like a great mix between convenience and portability. And then in the case of the Pentax itself, the 105 is such a classic lens that'd had my attention for years, it was an easy decision to go with Pentax. I'm still totally satisfied with the format and the system.
As I understand, the old 6x7 and the newer 67II are less repairable than the 67. I don't know the ins and outs of that, it's just what I'd read. Maybe if we all buy Pentax 17's, maybe there will be a 67III
OffTrail wrote
Ross Martin wrote
OffTrail wrote
Tina Kino wrote
OregonSun wrote
Portra 800Agfa Isolette II
Solinar 75mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54255664044_81ee05a62c_c.jpg
Isolette rendering very nice as well it seems, quite "gentle" 👍
Pretty sure I've posted these before, but both Pentax 67 and 105 f/2.4. I like this film stock a lot in 35mm, but it comes alive in 120.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53742573579_fb3f2a9c80_c.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54259358584_ec83dcb968_c.jpg
I considered adding 4x5 back in but honestly it’s too much hassle and aggravation for how I shoot now. The P67 is just much faster/easier to use in the field, especially due to roll film and being able to cost effectively bracket when shooting Velvia. Yeah, when I wanted a bigger negative than 35mm, 6x7 seemed like a great mix between convenience and portability. And then in the case of the Pentax itself, the 105 is such a classic lens that'd had my attention for years, it was an easy decision to go with Pentax. I'm still totally satisfied with the format and the system.
As I understand, the old 6x7 and the newer 67II are less repairable than the 67. I don't know the ins and outs of that, it's just what I'd read. Maybe if we all buy Pentax 17's, maybe there will be a 67III
Jan 16, 2025 at 03:31 PM
p.1408 #3Post your recent film shots!
lifeandmylens wrote:
Agfa Isolette II
Solinar 75mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54255664044_81ee05a62c_c.jpg..wow - can't recall ever getting lush greens like that from Portra 800 - very nice 🙂
Isolette rendering very nice as well it seems, quite "gentle" 👍Portra 800 can bring the greens.
Pretty sure I've posted these before, but both Pentax 67 and 105 f/2.4. I like this film stock a lot in 35mm, but it comes alive in 120.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53742573579_fb3f2a9c80_c.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54259358584_ec83dcb968_c.jpgDelicious rendering! I used to shoot with Pentax 67 and have had one in my eBay cart for awhile trying to decide if I want to return. I am craving me some Velvia chromes, but I may also try Portra if I get the MF cam (I have Portra 800 in my FM2 now).I miss my Pentax 67! Shouldn't have sold it. Mamiya 7 is more practical, but the Pentax was more fun. I'm starting to think Huss is onto something, never selling cameras haha.
Hey I sold my GW690III !
I loved the results when it didn’t fat roll, but did not enjoy the plasticky double wind action, or the springy sproink sound of the shutter release. I actually preferred the 690II but the one I got from Japan was all hazed up.
Ross Martin wrote
OffTrail wrote
Tina Kino wrote
OregonSun wrote
Portra 800Agfa Isolette II
Solinar 75mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54255664044_81ee05a62c_c.jpg
Isolette rendering very nice as well it seems, quite "gentle" 👍
Pretty sure I've posted these before, but both Pentax 67 and 105 f/2.4. I like this film stock a lot in 35mm, but it comes alive in 120.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53742573579_fb3f2a9c80_c.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54259358584_ec83dcb968_c.jpg
Hey I sold my GW690III !
I loved the results when it didn’t fat roll, but did not enjoy the plasticky double wind action, or the springy sproink sound of the shutter release. I actually preferred the 690II but the one I got from Japan was all hazed up.
Jan 16, 2025 at 05:22 PM
p.1408 #4Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
lifeandmylens wrote
Ross Martin wrote
OffTrail wrote
Tina Kino wrote
OregonSun wrote
Portra 800Agfa Isolette II
Solinar 75mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54255664044_81ee05a62c_c.jpg
Isolette rendering very nice as well it seems, quite "gentle" 👍
Pretty sure I've posted these before, but both Pentax 67 and 105 f/2.4. I like this film stock a lot in 35mm, but it comes alive in 120.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53742573579_fb3f2a9c80_c.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54259358584_ec83dcb968_c.jpg
I loved the results when it didn’t fat roll, but did not enjoy the plasticky double wind action, or the springy sproink sound of the shutter release. I actually preferred the 690II but the one I got from Japan was all hazed up.
The II has a cooler '80s aesthetic, but it definitely also has the plasticky double wind action and sproinky shutter sound (two things I couldn't care less about, TBH). Supposedly the III is easier to load though.
Jan 16, 2025 at 05:43 PM
p.1408 #5Post your recent film shots!
Played around with a 60 macro on the F3T and used a WLF with the magnifier (a great addition to the F3). 200T.
Jan 16, 2025 at 05:50 PM
p.1408 #6Post your recent film shots!
Nikon N80, 28-80mm kit lens, Tri-X, XTOL 7 min. at 68F
Statue in the Palmer Museum of Art, Penn State University
Please turn to your right...
Statue in the Palmer Museum of Art, Penn State University
Please turn to your right...
Jan 16, 2025 at 07:42 PM
p.1408 #7Post your recent film shots!
lifeandmylens wrote:
Played around with a 60 macro on the F3T and used a WLF with the magnifier (a great addition to the F3). 200T.
Love these. And you will see the WLF is such a great accessory, adding an interesting compositional perspective.
What is great about the F3 is you don’t lose metering w the WLF as the meter is built into the body, not the prism. With the F and F2, no metering w WLF. Same for my Minolta XKaaay.
Played around with a 60 macro on the F3T and used a WLF with the magnifier (a great addition to the F3). 200T.
Love these. And you will see the WLF is such a great accessory, adding an interesting compositional perspective.
What is great about the F3 is you don’t lose metering w the WLF as the meter is built into the body, not the prism. With the F and F2, no metering w WLF. Same for my Minolta XKaaay.
Jan 16, 2025 at 08:05 PM
p.1408 #8Post your recent film shots!
So what do you do when you have a new to you Fuji GW690 III that gives you larger than life negatives? Put a roll of 35mm through it! Only four rolls in but the idea of a Tex-Pan was hard to pass up. My first attempt at scanning I used the 6x9 mask and cropped keeping the sprocket holes. For some reason, my Laowa 90/2.8 macro does not like the extra light and screws with colors and white balance. So I used a 35mm mask and created 3-image panos for each. I'd like to be able to keep the sprocket holes but I can't figure out how to scan and process to get good results.
Fuji GW690 III + ProImage 100 + Cinestill C-41
Fuji GW690 III + ProImage 100 + Cinestill C-41
Jan 16, 2025 at 09:05 PM
p.1408 #9Post your recent film shots!
rji2goleez wrote:
So what do you do when you have a new to you Fuji GW690 III that gives you larger than life negatives? Put a roll of 35mm through it! Only four rolls in but the idea of a Tex-Pan was hard to pass up. My first attempt at scanning I used the 6x9 mask and cropped keeping the sprocket holes. For some reason, my Laowa 90/2.8 macro does not like the extra light and screws with colors and white balance. So I used a 35mm mask and created 3-image panos for each. I'd like to be able to keep the...Show more →
Whoa back up Francis. You did what now? And how? And what about the vf? And does your Mom know?
So what do you do when you have a new to you Fuji GW690 III that gives you larger than life negatives? Put a roll of 35mm through it! Only four rolls in but the idea of a Tex-Pan was hard to pass up. My first attempt at scanning I used the 6x9 mask and cropped keeping the sprocket holes. For some reason, my Laowa 90/2.8 macro does not like the extra light and screws with colors and white balance. So I used a 35mm mask and created 3-image panos for each. I'd like to be able to keep the...Show more →
Whoa back up Francis. You did what now? And how? And what about the vf? And does your Mom know?
Jan 16, 2025 at 09:23 PM
p.1408 #10Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
Fuji GW690 III + ProImage 100 + Cinestill C-41Whoa back up Francis. You did what now? And how? And what about the vf? And does your Mom know?
There are adapters that are sold in kits, most are 3D printed that attach to the 35mm canister to fit a 120 camera. Some come with a mask for inside the camera. A friend and I both recent bought the Fuji so he 3D printed some adapters and I took the first step to try it out. Tons of youtubes out there on this as well.
Here's one example but there are many.
https://www.amazon.com/eTone-Adapter-Fujifilm-Camera-Panorama/dp/B0C6SKGXP8/ref=sr_1_1?crid=317K5FDQAFPIF&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.1pw-UNLIcmULD-dwkdWsCGUjHj3kCM-PLgfX_rlE9sqggtzKUCWX3NfOKibdAV2kgU6K6PzLA1_KmlRfCMfw3HJk3M4xqVJNsKZYY2gP047JhJvZva54kTTX3PHsRXRK.xRoOHzEs5cdrJHupXvSy9rQR8zxAQtjBmPskahgvMw4&dib_tag=se&keywords=etone+120+adapter&qid=1737084637&sprefix=etone+120+adapter%2Caps%2C118&sr=8-1
rji2goleez wrote
So what do you do when you have a new to you Fuji GW690 III that gives you larger than life negatives? Put a roll of 35mm through it! Only four rolls in but the idea of a Tex-Pan was hard to pass up. My first attempt at scanning I used the 6x9 mask and cropped keeping the sprocket holes. For some reason, my Laowa 90/2.8 macro does not like the extra light and screws with colors and white balance. So I used a 35mm mask and created 3-image panos for each. I'd like to be able to keep the sprocket holes but I can't figure out how to scan and process to get good results.Fuji GW690 III + ProImage 100 + Cinestill C-41
There are adapters that are sold in kits, most are 3D printed that attach to the 35mm canister to fit a 120 camera. Some come with a mask for inside the camera. A friend and I both recent bought the Fuji so he 3D printed some adapters and I took the first step to try it out. Tons of youtubes out there on this as well.
Here's one example but there are many.
https://www.amazon.com/eTone-Adapter-Fujifilm-Camera-Panorama/dp/B0C6SKGXP8/ref=sr_1_1?crid=317K5FDQAFPIF&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.1pw-UNLIcmULD-dwkdWsCGUjHj3kCM-PLgfX_rlE9sqggtzKUCWX3NfOKibdAV2kgU6K6PzLA1_KmlRfCMfw3HJk3M4xqVJNsKZYY2gP047JhJvZva54kTTX3PHsRXRK.xRoOHzEs5cdrJHupXvSy9rQR8zxAQtjBmPskahgvMw4&dib_tag=se&keywords=etone+120+adapter&qid=1737084637&sprefix=etone+120+adapter%2Caps%2C118&sr=8-1
Jan 16, 2025 at 09:34 PM
|
p.1408 #11Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
Fuji GW690 III + ProImage 100 + Cinestill C-41Whoa back up Francis. You did what now? And how? And what about the vf? And does your Mom know?
As for the viewfinder, I just focused on the middle of the frame and approximated where top and bottom would be. The rangefinder patch is your friend here. And NO, my mom does not know . . .
rji2goleez wrote
So what do you do when you have a new to you Fuji GW690 III that gives you larger than life negatives? Put a roll of 35mm through it! Only four rolls in but the idea of a Tex-Pan was hard to pass up. My first attempt at scanning I used the 6x9 mask and cropped keeping the sprocket holes. For some reason, my Laowa 90/2.8 macro does not like the extra light and screws with colors and white balance. So I used a 35mm mask and created 3-image panos for each. I'd like to be able to keep the sprocket holes but I can't figure out how to scan and process to get good results.Fuji GW690 III + ProImage 100 + Cinestill C-41
As for the viewfinder, I just focused on the middle of the frame and approximated where top and bottom would be. The rangefinder patch is your friend here. And NO, my mom does not know . . .
Jan 16, 2025 at 09:36 PM
p.1408 #12Post your recent film shots!
rji2goleez wrote:
Fuji GW690 III + ProImage 100 + Cinestill C-41Whoa back up Francis. You did what now? And how? And what about the vf? And does your Mom know?As for the viewfinder, I just focused on the middle of the frame and approximated where top and bottom would be. The rangefinder patch is your friend here. And NO, my mom does not know . . .
I really need to put a roll through my relatively recently arrived GWS 690 III. I got the one with the 28mm equivalent focal length as I figure I would use it more for landscapes.
I have managed to replace the light seals, They were described as being about 90 per cent by the ebay seller, which turned out to be 90 per cent deteriorated.
Desmolicious wrote
rji2goleez wrote
So what do you do when you have a new to you Fuji GW690 III that gives you larger than life negatives? Put a roll of 35mm through it! Only four rolls in but the idea of a Tex-Pan was hard to pass up. My first attempt at scanning I used the 6x9 mask and cropped keeping the sprocket holes. For some reason, my Laowa 90/2.8 macro does not like the extra light and screws with colors and white balance. So I used a 35mm mask and created 3-image panos for each. I'd like to be able to keep the sprocket holes but I can't figure out how to scan and process to get good results.Fuji GW690 III + ProImage 100 + Cinestill C-41
I really need to put a roll through my relatively recently arrived GWS 690 III. I got the one with the 28mm equivalent focal length as I figure I would use it more for landscapes.
I have managed to replace the light seals, They were described as being about 90 per cent by the ebay seller, which turned out to be 90 per cent deteriorated.
Jan 16, 2025 at 09:46 PM
p.1408 #13Post your recent film shots!
Geoff D F wrote:
Fuji GW690 III + ProImage 100 + Cinestill C-41Whoa back up Francis. You did what now? And how? And what about the vf? And does your Mom know?As for the viewfinder, I just focused on the middle of the frame and approximated where top and bottom would be. The rangefinder patch is your friend here. And NO, my mom does not know . . .I really need to put a roll through my relatively recently arrived GWS 690 III. I got the one with the 28mm equivalent focal length as I figure I would use it more for landscapes.
I have managed to replace the light seals, They were described as being about 90 per cent by the ebay seller, which turned out to be 90 per cent deteriorated.
It really is a fun camera to use. And while it's enormous, its still pretty light. And with only 8 exposures per roll, it really makes you think before you click. I like that.
Edited on Jan 17, 2025 at 07:28 AM · View previous versions
rji2goleez wrote
Desmolicious wrote
rji2goleez wrote
So what do you do when you have a new to you Fuji GW690 III that gives you larger than life negatives? Put a roll of 35mm through it! Only four rolls in but the idea of a Tex-Pan was hard to pass up. My first attempt at scanning I used the 6x9 mask and cropped keeping the sprocket holes. For some reason, my Laowa 90/2.8 macro does not like the extra light and screws with colors and white balance. So I used a 35mm mask and created 3-image panos for each. I'd like to be able to keep the sprocket holes but I can't figure out how to scan and process to get good results.Fuji GW690 III + ProImage 100 + Cinestill C-41
I have managed to replace the light seals, They were described as being about 90 per cent by the ebay seller, which turned out to be 90 per cent deteriorated.
It really is a fun camera to use. And while it's enormous, its still pretty light. And with only 8 exposures per roll, it really makes you think before you click. I like that.
Edited on Jan 17, 2025 at 07:28 AM · View previous versions
Jan 16, 2025 at 09:51 PM
p.1408 #14Post your recent film shots!
rji2goleez wrote:
Fuji GW690 III + ProImage 100 + Cinestill C-41Whoa back up Francis. You did what now? And how? And what about the vf? And does your Mom know?As for the viewfinder, I just focused on the middle of the frame and approximated where top and bottom would be. The rangefinder patch is your friend here. And NO, my mom does not know . . .I really need to put a roll through my relatively recently arrived GWS 690 III. I got the one with the 28mm equivalent focal length as I figure I would use it more for landscapes.
I have managed to replace the light seals, They were described as being about 90 per cent by the ebay seller, which turned out to be 90 per cent deteriorated.It really is a fund camera to use. And while it's enormous, its still pretty light. And with only 8 exposures per roll, it really makes you think before you click. I like that.
That was kind of my thinking too. Go for quality over quantity. Do you still only get 8 shots per 36 roll? I suppose it sounds about right, but then you might as well shoot 120?
Geoff D F wrote
rji2goleez wrote
Desmolicious wrote
rji2goleez wrote
So what do you do when you have a new to you Fuji GW690 III that gives you larger than life negatives? Put a roll of 35mm through it! Only four rolls in but the idea of a Tex-Pan was hard to pass up. My first attempt at scanning I used the 6x9 mask and cropped keeping the sprocket holes. For some reason, my Laowa 90/2.8 macro does not like the extra light and screws with colors and white balance. So I used a 35mm mask and created 3-image panos for each. I'd like to be able to keep the sprocket holes but I can't figure out how to scan and process to get good results.Fuji GW690 III + ProImage 100 + Cinestill C-41
I have managed to replace the light seals, They were described as being about 90 per cent by the ebay seller, which turned out to be 90 per cent deteriorated.
That was kind of my thinking too. Go for quality over quantity. Do you still only get 8 shots per 36 roll? I suppose it sounds about right, but then you might as well shoot 120?
Jan 16, 2025 at 09:57 PM
p.1408 #15Post your recent film shots!
Geoff D F wrote:
rji2goleez wrote
Geoff D F wrote
rji2goleez wrote
Desmolicious wrote
rji2goleez wrote
So what do you do when you have a new to you Fuji GW690 III that gives you larger than life negatives? Put a roll of 35mm through it! Only four rolls in but the idea of a Tex-Pan was hard to pass up. My first attempt at scanning I used the 6x9 mask and cropped keeping the sprocket holes. For some reason, my Laowa 90/2.8 macro does not like the extra light and screws with colors and white balance. So I used a 35mm mask and created 3-image panos for each. I'd like to be able to keep the sprocket holes but I can't figure out how to scan and process to get good results.Fuji GW690 III + ProImage 100 + Cinestill C-41
I have managed to replace the light seals, They were described as being about 90 per cent by the ebay seller, which turned out to be 90 per cent deteriorated.
You get 13-14 shots per roll of 36 exp 35mm film.
Jan 16, 2025 at 10:04 PM
p.1408 #16Post your recent film shots!
Minolta X700 + Candido 400
Same as NC 400 I only adjusted exposure , highlight , shadow in LR.
Color straight from lab scan ( fuji sp3000 )
This was the first roll.
Halation is there but not obvious, you will see that when I share the 2nd roll. It definitely is Kodak movie film.
I can't remember the exactly price that my local film store is selling for, around $11-13.
How do you guys like the color and price ?
Ultra max 400 - around $9 per roll , Fuji 400 - around $8 per roll , Lomo 400 - around $15 per roll
To me , I may not purchase it again.
Same as NC 400 I only adjusted exposure , highlight , shadow in LR.
Color straight from lab scan ( fuji sp3000 )
This was the first roll.
Halation is there but not obvious, you will see that when I share the 2nd roll. It definitely is Kodak movie film.
I can't remember the exactly price that my local film store is selling for, around $11-13.
How do you guys like the color and price ?
Ultra max 400 - around $9 per roll , Fuji 400 - around $8 per roll , Lomo 400 - around $15 per roll
To me , I may not purchase it again.
Jan 16, 2025 at 10:16 PM
p.1408 #17Post your recent film shots!
So, to follow up the colorful dragon boat races, I have a bunch I took this afternoon. Headed out with a roll of Tri-X in the M4-2 and the weather was just a few degrees above freezing fog. After being soaked by two months of rain, Ole Bolle was pretty dark.
M4-2, Voigtlander 35 1.4 Nokton Classic SC V2, #15 yellow filter, Tri-X @ISO 200, Adox XT-3 !:!
Fat Kitty Ramen, Multnomah Village, Portland, Oregon
Ole Bolle, Metzger, Oregon
Ole Bolle, Metzger, Oregon
Ole Bolle, Metzger, Oregon
Ole Bolle, Metzger, Oregon
Wagon Wheel, Metzger, Oregon
Wagon Wheel, Metzger, Oregon
Wagon Wheels, Metzger, Oregon
Hansen House, Metzger, Oregon
Ole Bolle Hus, Metzger, Oregon
Ole Bolle Hus, Metzger, Oregon
Ole Bolle Hus, Metzger, Oregon
M4-2, Voigtlander 35 1.4 Nokton Classic SC V2, #15 yellow filter, Tri-X @ISO 200, Adox XT-3 !:!
Fat Kitty Ramen, Multnomah Village, Portland, Oregon
Ole Bolle, Metzger, Oregon
Ole Bolle, Metzger, Oregon
Ole Bolle, Metzger, Oregon
Ole Bolle, Metzger, Oregon
Wagon Wheel, Metzger, Oregon
Wagon Wheel, Metzger, Oregon
Wagon Wheels, Metzger, Oregon
Hansen House, Metzger, Oregon
Ole Bolle Hus, Metzger, Oregon
Ole Bolle Hus, Metzger, Oregon
Ole Bolle Hus, Metzger, Oregon
Jan 17, 2025 at 12:21 AM
p.1408 #18Post your recent film shots!
Skaters having a chat. Canon P, 35/2.5 Color-Skopar LTM, Fomapan 100
Skate-chat by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Skate-chat by Brad Hurley, on FlickrJan 17, 2025 at 03:34 AM
p.1408 #19Post your recent film shots!
Contax RTS II + Kentmere 400 pushed +1
Jan 17, 2025 at 06:52 AM
p.1408 #20Post your recent film shots!
rji2goleez wrote:
Fuji GW690 III + ProImage 100 + Cinestill C-41Whoa back up Francis. You did what now? And how? And what about the vf? And does your Mom know?There are adapters that are sold in kits, most are 3D printed that attach to the 35mm canister to fit a 120 camera. Some come with a mask for inside the camera. A friend and I both recent bought the Fuji so he 3D printed some adapters and I took the first step to try it out. Tons of youtubes out there on this as well.
Here's one example but there are many.
https://www.amazon.com/eTone-Adapter-Fujifilm-Camera-Panorama/dp/B0C6SKGXP8/ref=sr_1_1?crid=317K5FDQAFPIF&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.1pw-UNLIcmULD-dwkdWsCGUjHj3kCM-PLgfX_rlE9sqggtzKUCWX3NfOKibdAV2kgU6K6PzLA1_KmlRfCMfw3HJk3M4xqVJNsKZYY2gP047JhJvZva54kTTX3PHsRXRK.xRoOHzEs5cdrJHupXvSy9rQR8zxAQtjBmPskahgvMw4&dib_tag=se&keywords=etone+120+adapter&qid=1737084637&sprefix=etone+120+adapter%2Caps%2C118&sr=8-1
I ordered a kit too because the idea of having a xpan like camera was so tempting, but am still left with a few questions.
Do you let the film in the receiving canister or do you rewind somehow the film into the original one, you would need a new canister every time if not since they can’t be opened without damaging them?
I’ve read that you also need to tape the roller to give it more thickness.
I’m not clear yet on how to do things yet.
Really cool photos btw, it really gives some nice results, looks as good as what I’ve seen from an xpan. I’m eager to try it too.
Desmolicious wrote
rji2goleez wrote
So what do you do when you have a new to you Fuji GW690 III that gives you larger than life negatives? Put a roll of 35mm through it! Only four rolls in but the idea of a Tex-Pan was hard to pass up. My first attempt at scanning I used the 6x9 mask and cropped keeping the sprocket holes. For some reason, my Laowa 90/2.8 macro does not like the extra light and screws with colors and white balance. So I used a 35mm mask and created 3-image panos for each. I'd like to be able to keep the sprocket holes but I can't figure out how to scan and process to get good results.Fuji GW690 III + ProImage 100 + Cinestill C-41
Here's one example but there are many.
https://www.amazon.com/eTone-Adapter-Fujifilm-Camera-Panorama/dp/B0C6SKGXP8/ref=sr_1_1?crid=317K5FDQAFPIF&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.1pw-UNLIcmULD-dwkdWsCGUjHj3kCM-PLgfX_rlE9sqggtzKUCWX3NfOKibdAV2kgU6K6PzLA1_KmlRfCMfw3HJk3M4xqVJNsKZYY2gP047JhJvZva54kTTX3PHsRXRK.xRoOHzEs5cdrJHupXvSy9rQR8zxAQtjBmPskahgvMw4&dib_tag=se&keywords=etone+120+adapter&qid=1737084637&sprefix=etone+120+adapter%2Caps%2C118&sr=8-1
I ordered a kit too because the idea of having a xpan like camera was so tempting, but am still left with a few questions.
Do you let the film in the receiving canister or do you rewind somehow the film into the original one, you would need a new canister every time if not since they can’t be opened without damaging them?
I’ve read that you also need to tape the roller to give it more thickness.
I’m not clear yet on how to do things yet.
Really cool photos btw, it really gives some nice results, looks as good as what I’ve seen from an xpan. I’m eager to try it too.
Jan 17, 2025 at 07:11 AM