Yes I did James. As good as it is....I just can't justify the prices over there. It is insane. A 24 Lux (which is a major reason for the switch back) costs $7,000 when the Nikon 24G is better in every way BUT size. A 90 f/2 costs almost $4,000....imagine what a lens like the 85G would cost over there. Speaking of....here are a couple more
It look's like you've got some awesome companions. Do you shoot pets for clients as well? You do really well with the D300s + 300mm setup, keep it up!
-Ryan Ryan J. Weiss - Conceptual Photographer
Thank you. They are great companions. Nah, just for myself currently. The 300 is a fantastic lens Thanks again.
rsolti13 wrote:
Thanks Gary, yep....been using it a lot lately. I guess you can say I'm back . Fortunately/unfortunately there are things that the DSLR can do that a mirrorless camera just can't.
Thanks, and yes, D700. I hated using wides and tele lenses outside 35-50 on the Leica. Either you have to use external viewfinders which I despise or the accuracy for me at the long end just goes down the tubes. The shots I just posted with the 85G I had a 95+% hit rate, on the Leica it would have been 10% with a lens that cost almost 3 times as much
. Fortunately/unfortunately there are things that the DSLR can do that a mirrorless camera just can't. 
