fredmiranda.com
Login

Viltrox EVO

  
 
swldstn
Offline
Details
p.9 #1Viltrox EVO
RoamingScott wrote:
DWOfPaul wrote
RoamingScott wroteTechnically I think mine were the first to get published, just forgot to link em here

Reviewed on Z, but plenty of samples to show off rendering, and bokeh specifically.

https://youtu.be/nS9b8jUYWs4

https://www.scotttuckerphoto.com/blog/review-viltrox-af-35mm-f18-evo-for-nikon-z
Scott great job with the review! I really enjoyed the variety of high quality sample images. The only thing I think would be nice to add to future reviews is some commentary on vignetting.

At a high level, how did you feel it compares to the CV 35mm APO optically?
Good point about vignette...this review was literally down to the wire because of weather, I'll make sure to throw some comparisons into the blog post.

At a VERY high level, there's still not a 35mm Z lens I like better optically than the CV APO. The hardest thing to come to grips with the EVO is the bokeh which can be varied shot to shot and not entirely predictable, compared to the subdued and muted bokeh of the CV.

I also like the overall colors that come out of CV lenses more than Viltrox, especially in this case. The EVO has a
...Show more →

Curious if the yellow cast you see is unique to the Nikon version or the Nikon WB system. I just got my Sony version and admit I haven’t seen it but I’ve only had the lens for a day and I’m comparing it to only Sony mount lenses. I don’t have a CV manual lens for Sony.
Apr 22, 2026 at 09:55 AM
Jonas B
Offline
Details
p.9 #2Viltrox EVO
RoamingScott wrote:
[...]The CVs meter nice and warm and the Viltrox lenses meter quite cool, but also sometimes hotter than other lenses.


It's probably something interesting but what does it mean? If you can describe it making a non-Texas and old man understand?
Apr 22, 2026 at 10:25 AM
RoamingScott
Offline
[X]
Details
p.9 #3Viltrox EVO
I suspect that Viltrox uses the same front element coating across every mount type, so you would get some different color cast on each system if that’s the case.

I have many lenses from many manufacturers and none of them have the yellow tinge of the EVO line so I’m inclined to think it’s not a Nikon sensor thing. At least the color is consistent between the multiple EVO lenses!

It’s a pretty minor point, and it doesn’t put me off of using the lens in any way, I just do so much deep color work that it’s immediately noticeable… i’ve become very sensitive to color shifts.

I have also found that, outside of Hasselblad, Nikon has the most accurate auto white balance of the full frame companies, and is the perfect test bed on which to notice things like this.

swldstn wrote:
RoamingScott wrote
DWOfPaul wrote
RoamingScott wroteTechnically I think mine were the first to get published, just forgot to link em here

Reviewed on Z, but plenty of samples to show off rendering, and bokeh specifically.

https://youtu.be/nS9b8jUYWs4

https://www.scotttuckerphoto.com/blog/review-viltrox-af-35mm-f18-evo-for-nikon-z
Scott great job with the review! I really enjoyed the variety of high quality sample images. The only thing I think would be nice to add to future reviews is some commentary on vignetting.

At a high level, how did you feel it compares to the CV 35mm APO optically?
Good point about vignette...this review was literally down to the wire because of weather, I'll make sure to throw some comparisons into the blog post.

At a VERY high level, there's still not a 35mm Z lens I like better optically than the CV APO. The hardest thing to come to grips with the EVO is the bokeh which can be varied shot to shot and not entirely predictable, compared to the subdued and muted bokeh of the CV.

I also like the overall colors that come out of CV lenses more than Viltrox, especially in this case. The EVO has a yellowish tint over every photo which you can edit around, it's just more work. The CVs meter nice and warm and the Viltrox lenses meter quite cool, but also sometimes hotter than other lenses.
Curious if the yellow cast you see is unique to the Nikon version or the Nikon WB system. I just got my Sony version and admit I haven’t seen it but I’ve only had the lens for a day and I’m comparing it to only Sony mount lenses. I don’t have a CV manual lens for Sony.

Apr 22, 2026 at 10:43 AM
mudlake
Offline
Details
p.9 #4Viltrox EVO
My 35/1.8 EVO arrived today. Not much for me to photograph right now, but I did get some shots of my wife's garden that has been neglected for some time. I can confirm that the lens is very sharp wide open and so far I can't see any color fringing. Sharpness improves at f2 and then more at f2.8. Below are some of my first images, full image followed by a crop.




  ILCE-7RM5    35mm    f/1.8    1/4000s    100 ISO    0.0 EV  






  ILCE-7RM5    35mm    f/1.8    1/4000s    100 ISO    0.0 EV  






  ILCE-7RM5    35mm    f/1.8    1/4000s    100 ISO    0.0 EV  






  ILCE-7RM5    35mm    f/1.8    1/4000s    100 ISO    0.0 EV  






  ILCE-7RM5    35mm    f/1.8    1/4000s    100 ISO    0.0 EV  






  ILCE-7RM5    35mm    f/1.8    1/4000s    100 ISO    0.0 EV  

Apr 22, 2026 at 04:13 PM
milend
Offline
Details
p.9 #5Viltrox EVO


mudlake wrote:
My 35/1.8 EVO arrived today. Not much for me to photograph right now, but I did get some shots of my wife's garden that has been neglected for some time. I can confirm that the lens is very sharp wide open and so far I can't see any color fringing. Sharpness improves at f2 and then more at f2.8. Below are some of my first images, full image followed by a crop.


How’s the autofocus in AFC + Eye-AF?
Apr 22, 2026 at 04:15 PM
mudlake
Offline
Details
p.9 #6Viltrox EVO
milend wrote:
mudlake wroteMy 35/1.8 EVO arrived today. Not much for me to photograph right now, but I did get some shots of my wife's garden that has been neglected for some time. I can confirm that the lens is very sharp wide open and so far I can't see any color fringing. Sharpness improves at f2 and then more at f2.8. Below are some of my first images, full image followed by a crop.
How’s the autofocus in AFC + Eye-AF?


I haven't had a chance to test it with people yet. I'll do that as soon as my wife gets home from a vacation.
Apr 22, 2026 at 08:45 PM
mudlake
Offline
Details
p.9 #7Viltrox EVO
Here's a comparison with the Tamron 35-150, both at f2. First is the Viltrox.




  ILCE-7RM5    35mm    f/2.0    1/3200s    100 ISO    0.0 EV  






  ILCE-7RM5    35mm    f/2.0    1/2500s    100 ISO    0.0 EV  

Apr 22, 2026 at 09:07 PM
Tobylq007
Online
Details
p.9 #8Viltrox EVO
Received my copy today and can confirm the yellowish cast on A7CR tried some quick and dirty color adjustments and somewhat usable now, very dissapointed, I was hoping for better colors.
Ultrasharp and zero distortion at the far edges, impressive, feels rectilinear. Can see some 3D pop. Excellent flare resistance and good control of fringing (but still some under extreme conditions)
Will try this weekend on a real travel scenario shooting landscapes and people. Has potential.
Bringing the 35GM to compare
Apr 22, 2026 at 10:54 PM
RoamingScott
Offline
[X]
Details
p.9 #9Viltrox EVO
Tobylq007 wrote:
Received my copy today and can confirm the yellowish cast on A7CR tried some quick and dirty color adjustments and somewhat usable now, very dissapointed, I was hoping for better colors.
Ultrasharp and zero distortion at the far edges, impressive, feels rectilinear. Can see some 3D pop. Excellent flare resistance and good control of fringing (but still some under extreme conditions)
Will try this weekend on a real travel scenario shooting landscapes and people. Has potential.
Bringing the 35GM to compare


Good to know the yellow cast is, as expected, a multi-mount "issue" if you want to call it that. Thanks for the feedback.
Apr 23, 2026 at 07:18 AM
Jonas B
Offline
Details
p.9 #10Viltrox EVO
Viltrox have a firmware version 1.06 up for download. Is that the fw version you guys have (and the one you had @RoamingScott@ when reviewing the 35/1.8 EVO)?

Version 1.06 "fixed known issues"
https://viltrox.com/pages/af-35-1-8-evo-fe-apo

Are the focusing problems described by Roamingscott fixed with the new fw? I notice not all reviewers and influencers mention anything about the problem.
Apr 23, 2026 at 01:28 PM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

RoamingScott
Offline
[X]
Details
p.9 #11Viltrox EVO
Looks like I had 1.00 on my lens, and it reports 1.02 is the latest for Z. The updating app is entirely in Chinese, so THAT'S fun...

A quick test shows it has introduced focus pulsing/racking that wasn't present in 1.00 in middling light.
Apr 23, 2026 at 01:51 PM
mudlake
Offline
Details
p.9 #12Viltrox EVO
Jonas B wrote:
Viltrox have a firmware version 1.06 up for download. Is that the fw version you guys have (and the one you had @RoamingScott@@ when reviewing the 35/1.8 EVO)?

Version 1.06 "fixed known issues"
https://viltrox.com/pages/af-35-1-8-evo-fe-apo

Are the focusing problems described by Roamingscott fixed with the new fw? I notice not all reviewers and influencers mention anything about the problem.


Mine has firmware .01. I’ll check out the new one.
Apr 23, 2026 at 01:57 PM
RoamingScott
Offline
[X]
Details
p.9 #13Viltrox EVO
A quick step outside into better light and I couldn't get it to "pause" before confirmation, actually feels snappier in good light.

I suspect it's actually racking instead of pausing in those same scenarios indoors. I'll have to shoot it a while to confirm anything.
Apr 23, 2026 at 02:00 PM
lnguye68
Offline
Details
p.9 #14Viltrox EVO
I’m on the fence between the new Viltrox 35mm EVO and the Sony 40mm G. Does anyone who owns both mind sharing their experience? I know the 40mm is lighter and smaller, but I prefer the 35mm focal length. I currently have the 40mm.
Apr 24, 2026 at 12:00 AM
Chaliel
Offline
Details
p.9 #15Viltrox EVO
For now I will not change my Sony 40mm G for the Viltrox EVO 35mm.
Both new (35 and 55) Viltrox lenses have very good sharpness, but all the reviews mention slow AF.
Apr 24, 2026 at 02:12 AM
milend
Offline
Details
p.9 #16Viltrox EVO


Chaliel wrote:
For now I will not change my Sony 40mm G for the Viltrox EVO 35mm.
Both new (35 and 55) Viltrox lenses have very good sharpness, but all the reviews mention slow AF.


That’s one of the reasons why I love the 40G - so compact and so fast to focus.
Apr 24, 2026 at 02:15 AM
hiepphotog
Offline
Details
p.9 #17Viltrox EVO
Chaliel wrote:
For now I will not change my Sony 40mm G for the Viltrox EVO 35mm.
Both new (35 and 55) Viltrox lenses have very good sharpness, but all the reviews mention slow AF.


The next step for these guys is to include VCM/linear motor for AF and more advanced coatings. I do feel only us Sony users care about AF speed. Most of the other brands have mainly Stepper motors in this range, so the Viltrox’s AF speed wouldn’t feel too slow on those.
Apr 24, 2026 at 03:43 AM
Chaliel
Offline
Details
p.9 #18Viltrox EVO
Martin, from Phillipreeve made a review of the 55mm on a Nikon body, and also mentioned slow AF.

hiepphotog wrote:
Chaliel wroteFor now I will not change my Sony 40mm G for the Viltrox EVO 35mm.
Both new (35 and 55) Viltrox lenses have very good sharpness, but all the reviews mention slow AF.
The next step for these guys is to include VCM/linear motor for AF and more advanced coatings. I do feel only us Sony users care about AF speed. Most of the other brands have mainly Stepper motors in this range, so the Viltrox’s AF speed wouldn’t feel too slow on those.

Apr 24, 2026 at 04:51 AM
RoamingScott
Offline
[X]
Details
p.9 #19Viltrox EVO
I've not yet used a Pro line Viltrox, but they put linear motors in those and charge for it. That's not the point of the EVO line.
Apr 24, 2026 at 06:44 AM
Chaliel
Offline
Details
p.9 #20Viltrox EVO
Yes, but the pro lenses are big and havy, and I like the small, not so super fast lenses.
To give an exempt... I have the Sony 50mm f1.4 GMaster, and the Sony 50mm f2.5 G...
When I walk all day, I put on the small G lens
Apr 24, 2026 at 06:57 AM


FM ForumsSony ForumJoin Upload & Sell
  
 

You are not logged inLog inRegister