RoamingScott wrote:
Check out the TTArtisan 75/2 instead if you want something light and not quite as deep. A real sleeper lens.
Tried it. Didn’t like it at all.
And when I say the build felt cheap, I don’t mean the materials! Yes, the barrel is metal. I mean the actual feel and tolerances. On my copy, the aperture ring was way too loose, the hood creaked, and even Sony’s original E-mount rear cap wouldn’t stay on properly - only the TTArtisan cap did.
None of those things is a huge problem by itself, but taken together, the lens just felt cheap in the hand despite the metal construction. The Viltrox feels much, much better in terms of build quality and handling.
I’m also very picky about color and rendering. Absolute sharpness isn’t that important to me! I care much more about fine-detail contrast and tonal separation, what I personally think of as microcontrast. And that’s where the TTArtisan didn’t work for me either. Technically it’s quite good for the money, but I didn’t like the color rendering or the overall look it produced, especially at f/2.
I gave it a week and returned it.
My favorite in this general range is still the Sigma 65/2, but it’s not quite where I want to be in terms of focal length and weight. And I simply haven’t tried the 90/2.8 yet.