fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              19              21              33       34       end
  

Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review

  
 
Knut.
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #1 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


j4nu wrote:
Just remember that 100STF produces a lot less blur than typical fast short teles. You really need to compose your shot carefully if you want to have a nicely blurred background. It's not an issue when shooting flowers, as you're quite close then, but any kind of portrait presents a challenge (to me at least).


I agree, it is not a lens for separating and dissolving the background but for including it with as little as possible artifacts.



Oct 24, 2025 at 06:56 PM
Juha Kannisto
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #2 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


Yogifi wrote:
If possible, can someone post a full res sample image or two, ideally with some sunlight somewhere in there.

postimg.cc is what I've been using to upload.

Not for sharpness, just want to look at the light 'quality' after receiving my nokton 28mm f1.5 e-mount.

------

Failing that, for someone who has tried both the nokton and the apo.... would you describe the APO lens as rendering more modernly compared to the nokton?

I think that's what I was seeing with the nokton, bit more of a vintage look to the in-focus areas too. Crunchy. Would be nice to have an alternative that's
...Show more

I don/t have the 28/2 APO-.Lanthar VM anymore but I did have it for a couple of months. I shot it with my Sony A7CII on a few outings. Since it's not optimized for Sony sensor stack, the corner-to-corner sharpness suffered in stopped down infinity shots due to sensor stack induced field curvature and I felt like I had to stop it down to f8 and needed to focus quite carefully for best corner-to-corner sharpness results. The same thing might affect bokeh quality a bit as well. However, I think this could be a great lens for mirrorless when optimized for the right sensor stack (I'm waiting for E-mount version).

Here are 124 sample shots with my usual PP from August (hadn't uploaded them before):

https://photos.app.goo.gl/LoDQ5VsDRRQLT2ZK9

They were mostly shot at f8 and wide open at f2.



Oct 25, 2025 at 05:32 AM
Yogifi
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #3 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


Juha Kannisto wrote:
I don/t have the 28/2 APO-.Lanthar VM anymore but I did have it for a couple of months. I shot it with my Sony A7CII on a few outings. Since it's not optimized for Sony sensor stack, the corner-to-corner sharpness suffered in stopped down infinity shots due to sensor stack induced field curvature and I felt like I had to stop it down to f8 and needed to focus quite carefully for best corner-to-corner sharpness results. The same thing might affect bokeh quality a bit as well. However, I think this could be a great lens for mirrorless when
...Show more

Thank you so much again, Juha. Really appreciate sharing so many samples with us.

Going through the images, and with my current fixation on the lateral chromatic aberation (at least I think that's what it is) with the nokton when there's strong sunlight ... I spotted a wall in one image with some sun shining on it that I could examine.

And I see the same thing I'm seeing with my nokton e-mount, between the bricks, and in random places 'painting' things various colours, but in particular yellow.
Isn't fixed in lightroom with the remove ca option, appearing even at f8, and even centrally.

I've already barfed all over the nokton thread asking about it and it's just recovering now, so I won't chase it to the same extent. But I see it, and I think the sun isn't even as strong as in my example based on the shadows in the full image. They also aren't as well defined as the artefacts in my shot, but lightroom still doesn't manage to remove it .. though maybe because it's a jpg it's affecting that.

File DSC_02576 --- by any chance do you still have the original file for this shot so I can test the remove CA option in lightroom on it?:







I wonder if this is due to the sensor on the a7cii if it's still happening with the APO.

It doesn't really have any effect on the overall image in your example. But in mine, it gives it a funky look. I was counting on the APO to solve this so I can use it more freely in harsher light, which I'd like to do with a 28mm lens.

----

By all accounts I'm a complete beginner with stuff like this, so if anyone knows what it is, if it's something that happens with everything anyway and I just never noticed it before with my other lenses (shooting mostly portraits in nicer light) and to not do any detail shots up-close in harsh light and that's just how it is, I'll understand compeltely. Unfortunately I'm in the UK and the chances of us getting strong sunlight anytime soon again are quite slim for a while (for further testing).
It's been bugging me after my first image with the nokton where I tested it against the brick wall, and it happened to be under strong light, ended up looking like a still from cyberpunk with neon yellows painted between the bricks giving me a bit of a shock with my lovely new CV glass. It happens even with the fuji x100vi with the wide angle adaptor, but lightroom fixes it well enough with just the toggle to remove ca, leaving a more pleasing, natural looking image in this scenario, even if it's not as detailed as the nokton. I'm not recommending the fuji over the nokton based on this, it has tonnes of issues, but the nokton with the a7cii, and seemingly the APO at least (also with the a7cii) have this one.



Oct 28, 2025 at 10:09 PM
Juha Kannisto
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #4 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


Yogifi wrote:
Thank you so much again, Juha. Really appreciate sharing so many samples with us.

Going through the images, and with my current fixation on the lateral chromatic aberation (at least I think that's what it is) with the nokton when there's strong sunlight ... I spotted a wall in one image with some sun shining on it that I could examine.

And I see the same thing I'm seeing with my nokton e-mount, between the bricks, and in random places 'painting' things various colours, but in particular yellow.
Isn't fixed in lightroom with the remove ca option, appearing even at f8, and
...Show more

Thanks! I don't usually scrutinize the images so much at pixel level myself but I see what you are looking at in this case.

I still have the original RAW file (I shot compressed RAW) as well as the SOOC JPEG, but they are on my laptop at home and I'm now at the office. I will upload both to a folder e.g. in Google Drive and share a link later this evening. I don't know what the yellow thing there is, i don't personally think it would be CA though. I think I focused on the very far-away building on that shot (practically at infinity) and the area where the yellow effect appears is quite a bit closer.



Oct 29, 2025 at 01:38 AM
Juha Kannisto
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #5 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


Hi @Yogifi@, I copied the original RAW and SOOC JPEG of that shot here:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1FMAS2gGi6tvylorgNcL7VP0uJpk0DVbF?usp=sharing



Oct 29, 2025 at 08:09 AM
Yogifi
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #6 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


Thank you Juha, good timing!

-- it doesn't get rid of it with the raw file either unfortunately (barely does anything on this stuff like with the nokton), thank you very much for uploading the raw, appreciate that a tonne!

I can see it even at 100%, but it does seem to be only happening between the bricks, don't know why that's the achillies heel.

Won't be rushing to buy the APO as I'm quite happy with the nokton otherwise, though it would pair nicely with the 50 apo down the line maybe for solo walks.
The nokton 28/40(or 50) when out with people and call it a day. Can also just get away with the noktons.

Someone will be testing a similar thing with the nokton but on the a7rv and I will be curious, if anyone else is I belive the user, Kevner, will be posting in that thread at some point hopefully.



Oct 29, 2025 at 08:21 AM
tsdevine
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #7 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review



I suspect that is moire, which is going to be more of a function of the sensor (lacking an AA filter) than the lens, since you ruled out JPEG artifacts by looking at the RAW file.



Oct 29, 2025 at 08:44 AM
Yogifi
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #8 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


tsdevine wrote:
I suspect that is moire, which is going to be more of a function of the sensor (lacking an AA filter) than the lens, since you ruled out JPEG artifacts by looking at the RAW file.


Thank you, tsdevine. Lightroom does have a moire slider but you need to mask it in manually. On this image it fixes it brilliantly, not so much with the red wall I have - takes away a lot of the colour and there's many cracks.

I took a picture with the fuji x100vi + wideangle adaptor at the same time as the nokton with that scene and it has it too but less obvious and the remove ca tool works on it quite well.

I also don't see it with the nokton with less harsh light.

Anyway, maybe with a higher resolution sensor it won't show up as obviously at the same magnification.



Oct 29, 2025 at 09:09 AM
tsdevine
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #9 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


Yogifi wrote:
Thank you, tsdevine. Lightroom does have a moire slider but you need to mask it in manually. On this image it fixes it brilliantly, not so much with the red wall I have - takes away a lot of the colour and there's many cracks.

I took a picture with the fuji x100vi + wideangle adaptor at the same time as the nokton with that scene and it has it too but less obvious and the remove ca tool works on it quite well.

I also don't see it with the nokton with less harsh light.

Anyway, maybe with a higher
...Show more

So the Fuji X100VI uses an X-TRANS sensor, which by design will mitigate moire compared to a normal Bayer sensor. I don't think it's 100% immune, but it is less susceptible to it. So that might explain why you're not seeing it as much there.

On a bayer sensor, when there is fine detail and the lens can resolve that detail past the extinction point of the sensor....and there is no AA filter to "blur" the image to reduce the detail, then you may see moire. And I suspect in brighter light, there is more contrast....and in effect there is more "detail" due to that extra contrast in the source you are capturing. And that extra contrast would aggravate moire in the processed image.

I'm sure I butchered some things in that explanation above, and I'm sure someone will correct me/explain it better. And it's just a theory on my part.

And you're right....the lens comes into play on how much detail it can project on the sensor....and then also the density of the pixels on the sensor and whether there is an AA filter on the sensor (or other differences in sensor design like X-TRANS).



Oct 29, 2025 at 09:35 AM
Fred Miranda
Offline
Admin
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #10 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


Still no stock of this lens! It’s one of Cosina’s most successful designs. Hopefully they've managed to ramp up production.


Nov 04, 2025 at 04:29 PM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

Yogifi
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #11 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


I think it's off-topic at this point, but if anyone was curious, I suspect tsdevine is right about the sensor being responsible with the potential moire/artefacts we were discussing earlier:







Accidentally left the fuji on jpg there.

It's still visible in the higher resolution sensor, even more so in a few spots, like so:






But generally less:






It's not harsh light but I'm guessing something similar, especially the above example.

Can have a play around here and explore the comparison scene:
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=sony_a7iv&attr13_1=sony_a7cr&attr13_2=fujifilm_x100vi&attr13_3=hasselblad_x2dii100c&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=jpeg&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=100&attr16_1=100&attr16_2=125&attr16_3=100&attr126_0=1&attr199_0=1&normalization=full&widget=1&x=-0.5407895032661774&y=0.07234907151365334

I don't know if different glass affects the appearance/noticeablility of this stuff at the same focal length but probably not much.
I remember even seeing it on a fence with the 50mm APO and was comparing it with the nokton at the time, one shot one had it, the next the other had it, same scene but not on a tripod. I was zooming in a lot though, like I am above. The pattern was more like the one in the first screenshot.

I suspect getting the a7cr over the a7cii, and not expecting perfection, you'll be less likely to notice an example at 100% crop.. maybe.... doesn't seem to work that way for the hassleblad, so I dunno:






I noticed something was off in one scene with my a7cii when it was quite strong light at like 67%, could see it at 100% and that's what set off all this.

Not sure it's worth it for this. Another user mentioned somewhere on the site they got the 60megapixel for less artefacts but didn't actually need the resolution... I think he's probably right but who knows. Will likely just wait for a newer model at this point with hopefully a better viewfinder and some other improvements.


The fuji apsc is cleaner/less noticeable basically everywhere, but also less detailed of course. There is one spot I noticed where there's a weird pattern when it gets quite small:







Anyway, I'm still interested in the APO despite having the nokton, but that's probably being obsessive. I do like having the option to use a faster aperture, same with the nokton 50. But if I know there's little chance I'm taking a photo of someone that day, would make sense to pick this.



Nov 05, 2025 at 07:44 PM
Fred Miranda
Offline
Admin
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #12 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


Yogifi wrote:
I think it's off-topic at this point, but if anyone was curious, I suspect tsdevine is right about the sensor being responsible with the potential moire/artefacts we were discussing earlier:



https://i.postimg.cc/bYZz2BFk/image.png

But generally less:
https://i.postimg.cc/RZdrY7bX/image.png">




It's not harsh light but I'm guessing something similar, especially the above example.

Can have a play around here and explore the comparison scene:
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=sony_a7iv&attr13_1=sony_a7cr&attr13_2=fujifilm_x100vi&attr13_3=hasselblad_x2dii100c&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=jpeg&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=100&attr16_1=100&attr16_2=125&attr16_3=100&attr126_0=1&attr199_0=1&normalization=full&widget=1&x=-0.5407895032661774&y=0.07234907151365334

I don't know if different glass affects the appearance/noticeablility of this stuff at the same focal length but probably not much.
I remember even seeing it
...Show more

It could also be due to variation in lens performance, since perhaps more than one copy may have been used, or entirely different lenses. The higher the resolution, the more likely moire is to appear. There's also the possibility of tiny focus differences, meaning the samples weren't perfectly matched in sharpness.

On top of that, if a lens isn't perfectly centered, certain areas of the frame (especially where we’re magnifying and checking for moire) can appear sharper than others, which in turn can make moire more noticeable in those spots.



Nov 06, 2025 at 10:25 AM
tsdevine
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #13 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review



An AA filter, when the manufacturer decides to employ one, is generally meant to create a certain amount of blur to minimize the chance of moire. But that comes at a cost of detail, since the detail is ultimately what causes the moire. So even in areas of the frame where moire wouldn't have occurred, you are still getting less acutance. For a sensor without an AA filter, the higher the pixel density, it may cause moire to be less noticeable. Because it can successfully resolve more detail. But with a lens at an aperture where it can project more detail than the sensor can resolve, it's possible to see moire.

A poor man's way to avoid moire with a sensor that doesn't have an AA filter is to stop down and let diffraction create enough blur that it in effect is yielding the same result as an AA filter. Since diffraction causes a loss in resolving power, eventually the sensor won't show moire because of the blur.

Again...probably butchering this explanation, but my heart's in the right place.



Nov 06, 2025 at 10:45 AM
Yogifi
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #14 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


Thank you both, that does explain why I was seeing it show up a bit more at F8 vs F5.6 with the Nokton in my comparison, I think before diffraction there, didn't take at f16 for whatever (typically been testing my 50mm lenses!). The Nokton is decently sharp and I am only using it with the A7Cii. And it was mainly in the very high contrast areas.

A centre crop at 70% zoom with the a7cii and nokton 28mm at f8 during harsh sunlight:






Those funky cyberpunk yellows between the bricks are artefacts. No strong blues there like I'm seeing in similar examples of this strong yellow artefact (mostly in the screenshots posted earlier on this page where the black lines on white paper get closer and closer together) ... so possibly absorbed by the pale yellow-ish filler material between the bricks?
There was an example I had with boats in the distance that also had a similar effect, one big pole was yellow, and smaller poles blue. It was also in the shade in the distance, and stopped down but possibly the sun behind it, between the trees. Next shot same settings 15 seconds later, much less noticeable.

Anyway, if I understand correctly, and assuming the same exact photo in time & space (and light) with the A7Cr instead, it would show it less as the lens doesn't 'out-resolve' quite as much.
With dpreview, I would assume they're not using the same lens since they're doing it for so many different cameras including fixed lens. So maybe with the x1d and x2d II that's the reason - a less sharp lens was used with the x1d... Quite a few uses of 'maybe' and 'possibly' but what can we do.

I was confused because I assumed it was some sort of CA, loca at first because it looked like fringing, but it was showing up at smaller apertures. It was also showing up on the fuji but much more faintly...and lightroom's remove CA toggle (designed for lateral ca I think) was getting rid of it completely, but not with the sony. So I was thinking maybe the apo would show it less in similar conditions, but good to know what to expect.

No more brick walls for a while from me about this, sorry all, and for real this time!



Nov 06, 2025 at 10:54 AM
tsdevine
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #15 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


Yogifi wrote:
Thank you both, that does explain why I was seeing it show up a bit more at F8 vs F5.6 with Nokton in my comparison, I think before diffraction. The Nokton is decently sharp and I am only using it with the A7Cii. And it was mainly in the very high contrast areas.

With dpreview, I would assume they're not suing the same lens since they're doing it for so many different cameras including fixed lens.

A centre crop at 70% zoom with the a7cii and nokton 28mm at f8 during harsh sunlight:






Those funky cyberpunk yellows between the bricks are artefacts.

So if
...Show more

Well, assuming the sensor is the limiting factor in resolving detail....switching to the a7CR might minimize some of it, or at least make it so small it would be harder to see without pixel peeping.



Nov 06, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Fred Miranda
Offline
Admin
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #16 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


By the way, Cameraquest informed me that a new batch of the CV 28/2 APO-Lanthar is arriving in late November. If you pre-ordered early enough, that may be your batch.


Nov 06, 2025 at 01:26 PM
Yogifi
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #17 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


tsdevine wrote:
...
Well, assuming the sensor is the limiting factor in resolving detail....switching to the a7CR might minimize some of it, or at least make it so small it would be harder to see without pixel peeping.


If it was the lens that was the limiting factor and not the sensor, it would also show less from what I understood from Fred's post. Or am I missing something?




Nov 06, 2025 at 01:28 PM
tsdevine
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #18 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


Yogifi wrote:
If it was the lens that was the limiting factor and not the sensor, it would also show less from what I understood from Fred's post. Or am I missing something?



Yes...definitely. The example I gave about diffraction to me falls under that category as well. Stopping a lens down, will increase diffraction as you do it. Eventually, that progressive softening will generally preclude moire from occurring.

Spreading vaseline on a filter in front of the lens would also probably take care of it as well.



Nov 06, 2025 at 01:56 PM
Fred Miranda
Offline
Admin
Upload & Sell: On
p.20 #19 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


tsdevine wrote:
An AA filter, when the manufacturer decides to employ one, is generally meant to create a certain amount of blur to minimize the chance of moire. But that comes at a cost of detail, since the detail is ultimately what causes the moire. So even in areas of the frame where moire wouldn't have occurred, you are still getting less acutance. For a sensor without an AA filter, the higher the pixel density, it may cause moire to be less noticeable. Because it can successfully resolve more detail. But with a lens at an aperture where it can project more
...Show more

---------------------------------------------

Yogifi wrote:
Thank you both, that does explain why I was seeing it show up a bit more at F8 vs F5.6 with the Nokton in my comparison, I think before diffraction there, didn't take at f16 for whatever (typically been testing my 50mm lenses!). The Nokton is decently sharp and I am only using it with the A7Cii. And it was mainly in the very high contrast areas.

A centre crop at 70% zoom with the a7cii and nokton 28mm at f8 during harsh sunlight:






Those funky cyberpunk yellows between the bricks are artefacts. No strong blues there like I'm seeing in similar
...Show more

Diffraction begins as soon as a lens is stopped down from wide open, but on today's high MP sensors it usually becomes noticeable only after f/5.6-8 and smaller apertures on full frame. High MP sensors don’t directly reduce moire... instead, the smaller pixel pitch allows the sensor to capture fine repeating patterns more accurately across more pixels. (moire less noticeable)

On lower-resolution sensors, fine repeating patterns can create visible moire because the larger pixels cannot fully resolve the detail, making it harder for software to correct through demosaicing. Even with future 100–200 MP sensors, diffraction will still exist, but higher resolution will continue to help control moire because the pixel pitch will be even smaller.



Nov 06, 2025 at 05:55 PM
fjablo
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.20 #20 · Voigtlander 28mm f/2 APO-Lanthar Review


In case you want to rule out moiré with near-certainty, try taking a pixel shift image of a completely static scene. The higher resolution and importantly the true RGB information per-pixel should eliminate moiré.

Potential issues would be any movements or imperfect resampling in Sony‘s pixel shift algorithm. But probably still the best approach to determine whether it’s the lens or the sensor.



Nov 07, 2025 at 02:04 AM
1       2       3              19              21              33       34       end






FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              19              21              33       34       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account