fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              11              13              29       30       end
  

Archive 2024 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications

  
 
Cliff L.
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.12 #1 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


Jman13 wrote:
Yes, they do in the T mode on the dial, which is close enough. Forgot about that. Still...all should have it. Seems easy enough.


The Nikon cameras only allow the longer shutter speeds in Manual mode. The Sony A7R V also does timed exposures down to 15 minutes in Timed Bulb mode, which is essentially the same thing. The Canon R5 does Timed Bulb exposures down to 99 hours, 59 minutes, and 59 seconds.



Jul 18, 2024 at 09:15 AM
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.12 #2 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


snapsy wrote:
I'm guessing it's because the metering system accuracy is lower at the very low light levels associated with very long shutter speeds. I believe Nikon only recently added the longer shutter speeds - I agree, they're very useful to have.


Yeah, my Z8 shuts off metering at longer than 30s, which is fine...I can estimate, and it's only available in manual mode, but that's fine. It's just so much nicer to be able to quickly dial in a long exposure and then tweak it, rather than have to set a timer in a menu, or even worse, watch a stopwatch for 5 minutes and remember to go stop the exposure.



Jul 18, 2024 at 09:18 AM
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.12 #3 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


molson wrote:
The Nikon cameras only allow the longer shutter speeds in Manual mode. The Sony A7R V also does timed exposures down to 15 minutes in Timed Bulb mode, which is essentially the same thing. The Canon R5 does Timed Bulb exposures down to 99 hours, 59 minutes, and 59 seconds.


Yes, I'm well aware of the timed bulb modes in Canon (and I mention it in my post)...but you have to menu dive for it, set the time in the menu, and then get out and shoot. And of course it's going to do it only in manual mode...if you're shooting at ultra-long exposures, you're going to be in manual mode anyway.



Jul 18, 2024 at 09:19 AM
Cliff L.
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.12 #4 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


Jman13 wrote:
Yes, I'm well aware of the timed bulb modes in Canon (and I mention it in my post)...but you have to menu dive for it, set the time in the menu, and then get out and shoot. And of course it's going to do it only in manual mode...if you're shooting at ultra-long exposures, you're going to be in manual mode anyway.


Pressing a couple of buttons and setting the exact exposure time you want isn't really any harder than scrolling and scrolling and scrolling to get down to the some arbitrary long exposure time closest to the one you want, is it?



Jul 18, 2024 at 09:30 AM
lighthound
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #5 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


Jman13 wrote:
Yeah, my Z8 shuts off metering at longer than 30s, which is fine...I can estimate, and it's only available in manual mode, but that's fine. It's just so much nicer to be able to quickly dial in a long exposure and then tweak it, rather than have to set a timer in a menu, or even worse, watch a stopwatch for 5 minutes and remember to go stop the exposure.


I'm right there with you on this one. I don't "go there" very often and I'm never in a hurry when I do, but having to go menu diving seems ridiculous to me. I don't understand why this can't simply be an extension of the shutter speeds. Like you said, we're in manual anyhow so why not.



Jul 18, 2024 at 09:38 AM
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.12 #6 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


molson wrote:
Pressing a couple of buttons and setting the exact exposure time you want isn't really any harder than scrolling and scrolling and scrolling to get down to the some arbitrary long exposure time closest to the one you want, is it?


Yeah, it's a pain. Just now I pulled out my R8 and went to go set it.

First, I need to get a general idea of the exposure. Since there is no metering in Bulb mode at all, and the bulb timer only works when sent to Bulb mode, first I need to go into Manual mode, and see what the metering is at 30s. 3 stops underexposed? Ok, so I'll need a 4 minute exposure.

Second, I need to turn it into bulb mode (then the option becomes available). (Edit: and bonus - the aperture doesn't automatically stay the same when changing from M to B, so if your earlier setting was different from your current metered one in M, you have to change the aperture again).

Then I have to remember where in the damn menus the setting is. If I go 2 months between needing this, that can be a pain. I even have it in my My Menu (3rd page), but I missed it the first time through and ended up spending over a minute looking through all the menu pages trying to find it. Then I have to select 'Enable' after going into the menu option. Then press Info (and dont forget to press info, because just hitting enable will just leave it at whatever you had set before), then scroll over to the the minutes, press Set, then press up or down until 4 is set. Then press Set again to confirm.

Then I need to remember to either tap "OK" on the screen, or navigate over to the OK button and confirm it, because even after you've set it, if you get out by half pressing the shutter button, it won't save the time setting you've just set. (I have forgotten this step to my frustration many, many times). Then you can go ahead and exit the menu and tap the shutter to expose.

Then, if your exposure is actually still a little dark and you want to go to, say, 6 minutes, you need to go back to the menu, re-enter, make sure you confirm, etc.

On my Nikons: Go to Manual mode, meter at 30s, calculate that I need a 4 minute exposure, then move the dial 5 notches to 240". Done. Need to go to 6 minutes? 4 more clicks. Done.

It's a LOT easier.


Edited on Jul 18, 2024 at 10:08 AM · View previous versions



Jul 18, 2024 at 09:50 AM
Jeff
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.12 #7 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


I agree 1000%. It's inane that Canon continues with a an approach (Bulb) that was based upon the limited technical capabilities of the era. There is zero reason we shouldn't be able to choose a shutter speed greater than 30s in manual mode. This is actually a large PITA for the shooting I do.


Jul 18, 2024 at 09:59 AM
Cliff L.
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.12 #8 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


Jman13 wrote:
Yeah, it's a pain. Just now I pulled out my R8 and went to go set it.

First, I need to get a general idea of the exposure. Since there is no metering in Bulb mode at all, and the bulb timer only works when sent to Bulb mode, first I need to go into Manual mode, and see what the metering is at 30s. 3 stops underexposed? Ok, so I'll need a 4 minute exposure.

Second, I need to turn it into bulb mode (then the option becomes available).

Then I have to remember where in the damn menus the
...Show more

I just tried the same process with my Z8 for comparison... turn the camera on, find out the battery is dead again, put the battery on the charger... and in the mean time, three or four button presses and my R5 is set to the last long exposure time I used. Press OK and then press the shutter button. Way faster on the Canon!

Just because you spent several minutes trying to remember how to operate your camera, doesn't make the process fundamentally worse.



Jul 18, 2024 at 10:07 AM
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.12 #9 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


molson wrote:
I just tried the same process with my Z8 for comparison... turn the camera on, find out the battery is dead again, put the battery on the charger... and in the mean time, three or four button presses and my R5 is set to the last long exposure time I used. Press OK and then press the shutter button. Way faster on the Canon!

Just because you spent several minutes trying to remember how to operate your camera, doesn't make the process fundamentally worse.


Give me a break. From the time you've metered your exposure, to set the proper long exposure, even knowing where everything is takes a mode dial change, and a minimum of 7 button presses (and that's only if Bulb Timer is the first thing on your My Menu, otherwise it will be more, and for most people that will be the case), plus whatever button presses you have to set the time, to lock in the correct exposure. Any changes to that exposure take an additional 7 button presses, and the multi-step order that has to be followed, including the dumb confirmation step, leads to potential errors.

Vs. moving a dial a couple notches.

They are not even remotely the same. I'm sorry, there is no way I can accept that menu diving and fiddling with menu settings and changing modes between metering is fundamentally as simple as continuing to adjust the shutter speed directly.

I'm in no way saying this is a deal-breaking problem with Canon cameras...it's not a huge deal, but it's still dumb, since it can be easily remedied by firmware.

Edited on Jul 18, 2024 at 10:14 AM · View previous versions



Jul 18, 2024 at 10:12 AM
Cliff L.
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.12 #10 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


Jeff wrote:
I agree 1000%. It's inane that Canon continues with a an approach (Bulb) that was based upon the limited technical capabilities of the era. There is zero reason we shouldn't be able to choose a shutter speed greater than 30s in manual mode. This is actually a large PITA for the shooting I do.


It's even more insane that none of the "big three" camera makes allow more than a 30-second metered exposure in any of the auto modes, when the competitors can go down to 60 seconds or even longer, especially with the absurd low-EV metering levels some of them claim.

My old 1980's vintage Nikon FA and FE2 would reliably meter exposures of several minutes in aperture priority mode (as long as you compensated for reciprocity failure, of course)



Jul 18, 2024 at 10:13 AM
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.12 #11 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


I agree that it would be even better if the autoexposure modes went to 2-4 minutes or longer.


Jul 18, 2024 at 10:15 AM
Cliff L.
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.12 #12 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


Jman13 wrote:
Give me a break. From the time you've metered your exposure, to set the proper long exposure, even knowing where everything is takes a mode dial change, and a minimum of 7 button presses, plus whatever button presses you have to set the time, to lock in the correct exposure. Any changes to that exposure take an additional 7 button presses, and the multi-step order that has to be followed, including the dumb confirmation step, leads to potential errors.

Vs. moving a dial a couple notches.

They are not even remotely the same. I'm sorry, there is no way I
...Show more


I'm sorry, but it's just so hard to take you seriously when you explicitly made the gist of your argument the fact that you had forgotten how to use your R8... but I do agree that it would be nicer to have metered exposures down to one or two minutes, since it likely requires nothing more than a firmware update in any of these cameras.



Jul 18, 2024 at 10:18 AM
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.12 #13 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


molson wrote:
I'm sorry, but it's just so hard to take you seriously when you explicitly made the gist of your argument the fact that you had forgotten how to use your R8... but I do agree that it would be nicer to have metered exposures down to one or two minutes, since it likely requires nothing more than a firmware update in any of these cameras.


It wasn't the main point, but one point. My point there was just that when menu diving for specific items, especially those that aren't used every day, it can add another layer of complexity. Sure, this time it was longer since I haven't used my R8 much recently, but even when using the camera daily, it's not a function that is used daily.

Anyway, this is far more of a tangent than I wanted it to be.



Jul 18, 2024 at 10:27 AM
docusync
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #14 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


wind30 wrote:
you are totally missing the point... the state of technology is DIFFERENT between now and when Z8 was launch. you can't compare camera prices like that.

you might as well compare canon R5ii to Nikon D1... common this is pure maths and logic.

For r5ii pricing to work, you have to compare CURRENT price of CURRENT competitors. honestly it is not that hard to understand.


Really? So according to your logic Canon should start selling a better just-released camera cheaper than the competitor selling their inferior 1 year old camera now? Is it some kind of race to zero? You lost me here buddy.



Jul 18, 2024 at 10:57 AM
cjacques
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #15 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


arbitrage wrote:
Exactly...there is no reason for Canon to try and compete on price with the Z8 immediately. IMO, based only on the specs and based on my time shooting the Z8 and my ownership of the R5, I'd say the R5II is a better camera than the Z8 in every way that is important to me for my bird shooting.
Canon BEAF is already better in the R5 than it is in the Z8 so the R5II can only widen the gap.
R5II has precapture in RAW up to the full 30FPS and 0.5s is an okay time if we are forced to
...Show more


Hi Geoff

As you know I am no expert so this is just my two cents and a perspective from a long time Canon User who has never used any other system. I am currently toying with the idea to switch to Sony or Nikon. It is not a money saving temptation that would drive me to Nikon and it is not a camera performance envy that would make me switch to Sony. It is mainly Canon lens offering for wildlife photography. Would love to see a 300 F2.8 at 2 pounds lighter than the current RF 100-300 or the old 300 F 2.8 mark ii, a 600 F4 with a 1.4x or a 800 F 6.3 at 3 pounds less than my current Canon 600 F4 mark ii. I could patiently wait for them even if they were not release these until late next year. (Gives me time to obtain a second mortage ) However the silence that Canon is entertaining in that regard is not encouraging. Is the rumoured RF 200-500 still in the pipeline? What disapointed me the most about the announcement of the R1 and R5 mark ii was the fact that a VR lens rather than a great new lens for wildlife photography was announced. I think that this coupled with the "AI innovation" they are pushing/promoting in their recent releases (rather then the traditional expectations for a flagship, for example) are perhaps indicative as to where Canon hopes to make money in the future, Not sure "sports photographers" or "wildlife photographers" niches are their main targets. Perhaps they are looking at bigger fish to fry.



Jul 18, 2024 at 11:30 AM
Flowernut
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #16 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


you have to be kidding. No gps! Relatively little for still photographers. I've been with canon since late 60's. Maybe time to change.


Jul 18, 2024 at 12:41 PM
HicHic
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #17 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications




molson wrote:
Interesting fiction.

I presume you mean the Tamrikon 180-600, since Nikon doesn't have a 200-600. The RF 100-500 may be 1/3 of a stop slower, but it is most definitely sharper than the Tamrikon. The RF 200-800 is actually lighter (2200g) than the Tamrikon 180-600 (2325g), and the sharpness is about the same.


There's no such thing as a Tamrikon. The 200-600 is a Sony lens. Are you new to wildlife?



Jul 18, 2024 at 02:37 PM
artsupreme
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.12 #18 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


I'm curious where the proximity sensor is on the R5II. I'm assuming they incorporated it behind the EVF glass. This is a big deal for me but I guess I'll find out when I get mine soon.


Jul 18, 2024 at 02:48 PM
Hairy Heron
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #19 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


Does anyone know if the R5 II can take advantage of CFx 4.0 card speed? To be clear I'm not talking about base compatibility since I know 4.0 is backwards compatible, but can actually write to the card near the card's advertised read speed.


Jul 18, 2024 at 03:08 PM
Greg Schneider
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.12 #20 · Official Canon EOS R5 Mark II Images & Specifications


Hairy Heron wrote:
Does anyone know if the R5 II can take advantage of CFx 4.0 card speed? To be clear I'm not talking about base compatibility since I know 4.0 is backwards compatible, but can actually write to the card near the card's advertised read speed.


It's a Cfe 2.0 slot, which can theoretically reach 2GB/sec. Whether that can be achieved with the camera hardware and data pipeline remains to be seen, but it could potentially benefit from the increased sustained write speeds on the larger, newer 4.0 cards. Users of the Z8/Z9 have reported the larger 4.0 cards do perform noticeably better (1TB+ cards often feature 1.5GB/s sustained write vs 800MB/s for the 512GB) despite not having 4.0 slots.



Jul 18, 2024 at 03:34 PM
1       2       3              11              13              29       30       end




FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              11              13              29       30       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account