ryanli Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.11 #7 · p.11 #7 · Sigma 28-45mm f/1.8 DG DN Art Prime Comparison / Image Thread | |
As previously promised, here are some comparisons of the 28-45/1.8 against the Sony 24/1.4 GM. This comparison makes sense for me because one of my motivations for buying the 24 GM, as one of my first Sony E mount lenses back in the day, was to replicate the DSLR Sigma 24-35/2 experience in a much lighter package with native AF (with APS-C crop mode, the 24 GM becomes an effective 36/2.1). And whilst I personally prefer the 24mm FOV to 28mm, I would class the 24/1.4 and the wide end of the 28-45/1.8 both as "fast wides" with similar use cases.
All shots taken using A7C II on tripod, silent shutter, point AF, best of 3 shots using self-timer. Sigma on the left, Sony on the right.
Sigma 28-45/1.8 @ 28mm, F/1.8 (left) vs Sony 24 GM @ 24mm, F.1.4 (right)
Apologies for the slight difference in the plane of focus, I had tried to focus on the orange ball but the 24 GM appeared to focus slightly in front of it. Still, the differences look quite obvious to me:
The Sigma renders the in-focus areas with biting sharpness and crispness, whilst the Sony just doesn't quite achieve that level of detail or contrast. As for out-of-focus areas, the Sony suffers horribly from LoCA which really detracts from what I would consider otherwise consider as generally pleasant, if at times nervous rendering. Sigma's bokeh has a touch more outlining but otherwise looks even, well-controlled, with less cat's eyes towards the edges/corners - overall a more pleasant painterly look.
Fit to frame
100% crop - orange ball
100% crop - foliage detail
100% crop - fence bokeh
100% crop - tree bokeh
I also compared the Sigma wide open against the Sony stopped down by 1 stop to F/2; amazingly, the Sony only then just about matches the Sigma for sharpness but is still surpassed by the zoom in terms of microcontrast/crispness. Also stopping down doesn't fix the LoCA on the Sony, so the bokeh looks even worse.
Sigma 28-45/1.8 @ 36mm, F/1.8 (left) vs Sony 24 GM in APS-C mode @ 36mm equiv., F.1.4 (right)
For fun I tried to replicate my Sigma 24-35 use case on my A7C II with the help of APS-C crop mode. For the magnified crops, the Sony are at 100% crop whilst the Sigma have been zoomed down to 67% to match image size. The superior sharpness of the Sigma is a given considering both the higher pixel count in FF mode and what we have already seen of the Sigma at 24mm. However, I'd say at 36mm the Sigma renders OOF more harshly with more definite outlining both in comparison to its own wide end and to the Sony GM; this is quite obvious in the tree and windmill crops.
Fit to frame
Crop - orange ball
Crop - foliage detail
Crop - windmill bokeh
Crop - fence bokeh
Crop - tree bokeh
In conclusion, another very impressive performance from the Sigma with prime-beating sharpness, contrast, and LoCA; and comparatively clean OOF rendering at 28mm vs the Sony 24 GM. I think my 24 GM will be going on eBay soon! I did prefer the Sigma's OOF rendering at 28mm than at 36mm; unfortunately, I don't have a 35/1.4 GM or Sigma 35/1.2 or 1.4 to compare it against so I'd be interested to hear others' experiences.
|