tzhang4284 Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
ajamils wrote:
Thank you everyone for the replies.
I was heavily invested in Sony but have paired down the kit quite a bit as I wasn't shooting much. So right now I have the following
- Sony 20-70 F4 (just got last week)
- Tamron 150-500
- Samyang 50/1.4 II
- Sigma 105/1.4 (plan to switch to Nikon version, if I made the switch)
RoamingScott, Sony colors is something that I always struggled with even though I've been using it for year. With that said, A1 and A7rV do have the best colors that I've seen out of Sony and usually do not require a lot of tweaking, unless it is with flash where things are still very inconsistent.
RoamingScott/patotts, I agree with you. Since 90% of my photography is family and travel. 24-120 F4 and 50 could cover most of them.
My only concern about the switch is due to the size and weight of Z8. It is still quite bit bigger. Also, a lot of tests put the AF lagging behind Sony, specially when it comes to Eye-AF. ...Show more →
Based on your lens line up, I don't think you'll get any real benefit from switching to Nikon besides having a stacked sensor. All the Nikon equivalents are pretty much comparable or worse than the Sony FE equivalents from a technical image quality perspective. The Sony A7RV is also literally the top of the line when it comes to AF and I don't think you'll get anything more that you can perceive from Nikon even with their eventual firmware upgrade. The Sony colors issue in my opinion is real and what led me to Leica but I don't think "Nikon colors" are all that much better than Sony colors. Go Fuji or Leica if you care about color rendition.
If you want the 400mm f4.5, 600mm f6.3 or 800mm f6.3, then the Nikon Z8 makes a lot of sense but outside of that, seems like low ROI. The Nikon ZF also looks great as a fun travel camera with killer AF and nice styling but if you're looking for pure technical image quality and resolution, that's not it compared to the Sony A7R V.
|