tsdevine Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #3 · p.1 #3 · The new Nikon Z8 vs the Sony A7RV and potential A9III | |
I think you're just seeing healthy competition. As to how Sony reacts to this, vs how Canon does....vs how Nikon reacts to something Sony does vs etc...ad nauseum.....I doubt anyone can throw bones and tell you what will happen.
I assume at the minimum, the big three will do things to compete, and there will be adjustments they will make as a result of that competition.
And we all benefit.
swldstn wrote:
So the new Nikon Z8 is out with stacked 47.5 Mpixel fully electronic shutter and in the US is priced at $3999 USD.
So it’s $2500 less than an Alpha 1 and shoots 20 FPS 14-bit RAW, has CFExpress B & UHS-II and also supports 8K Video.
If lenses and third party offerings is a reason for the Sony so be it. If you really need 61 Mpixels great, if you think AF tracking is better that’s a Sony plus but I think it will put a lot of pressure on Sony to come to the party with a new competitor or an A1 price reduction IMHO.
I shoot with both an A1 (x2) and A7RV now but did also own a a Z9 for a year and the Z8 looses little functionality and ~400 grams to the Z9 and at $3999 that’s impressive.
I’m curious what others think. The Nikon Z mount S lens portfolio has really rounded out and really won’t hold you back. Sure it’s not as extensive as Sony with Sigma or Tamron added in but pretty much all the bases are covered and at the telephoto end only Sony’s 200-600 G gives Sony users some more flexibility but Nikon’s new 400 and 600 with integrated 1.4x TC, 800/6.3 PF, 400/4.5, and easy to adapt f-mount 500/5.6 PF are all very nice and all are unique right now.
Also I can share that when I used the tiny Megadapt ETZ-21 E to Z adapter my Sony lenses worked very well on the Z9 and it’s so small you really don’t know it’s there.
As I said, just posting to see what others yhink the impact to Sony will be.
Thank you for your time....Show more →
|