Fred Miranda Offline Admin Upload & Sell: On
|
akashyap wrote:
How do we think this lens compares to the ZM 85 or Loxia 85 as a high resolving, landscape specialist? I feel like it doesn’t have to be as high resolving as the ZM or Loxia to be considered an attractive option because of it’s size and maximum aperture, and it’s current sample images and sharpness already seem to be “good enough” for a lightweight f1.9 option.
Is there any reason to grab a ZM 85 or 85 Loxia over this 75/1.9 CV, other than Zeiss colors and contrast and maybe absolute sharpness (in the case of the Loxia)
The Loxia 85mm f/2.4 and the 85/4 ZM are both excellent compact lenses, with the former being a particularly strong performer. However, when stopped down to f/5.6 or smaller apertures, the 85/4 ZM is not too far behind. On the other hand, the Voigtlander 75/1.9 Ultron performs exceptionally well, with no visible weaknesses at small apertures, although it should be noted that this was tested only on the Leica M sensor. While I have not compared them directly, I would expect the Loxia to still have a slight edge, but the difference would likely be insignificant.
|