fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              24              26              32       33       end
  

Archive 2018 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion

  
 
cvrle59
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.25 #1 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


At the end of the day, Z7 isn't as bad as it's been presented so far, actually, it is an excellent camera.
It has some advantages, and some disadvantages compared to similar products, but we already knew it, there is no perfect camera, yet.



Nov 04, 2018 at 09:51 PM
Baldego
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.25 #2 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


Very much agreed. I've been a Sony user for almost five years but I bought a Z7 three weeks ago and now I'm in the process of making the switch from Sony to Nikon. I've give this decision a lot of thought. I know that I'm sacrificing some features like very snappy autofocus and EyeAF as well as a much more mature line-up of lenses But I just love the feel of the Z7 in my hands and the IQ it produces.


Nov 04, 2018 at 10:25 PM
1bwana1
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.25 #3 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


DPReview has published their full review as well. Once again, it looks very balanced to me despite this forums early bashing.

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikon-z7

In general the full reviews I am seeing are very much in line with each other as far as strengths and weaknesses are concerned.



Nov 05, 2018 at 01:29 PM
1bwana1
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.25 #4 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


From Hogan something I think we all can agree with: https://nikonrumors.com/.

Although I would have said "most capable" rather than best. The size and weight of these camera kits for some of us is no longer a compromise we can make due to physical limitations. So, while not "best" for everyone, the D850, and D500 are the most capable all around ICL Digital Cameras ever made.



Nov 05, 2018 at 03:05 PM
lukemeup
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.25 #5 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


Looks like Z6 samples are making their way to testers / reviewers - 1st hands-on I've managed to find so far:






Nov 05, 2018 at 04:44 PM
sungphoto
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.25 #6 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


Baldego wrote:
Very much agreed. I've been a Sony user for almost five years but I bought a Z7 three weeks ago and now I'm in the process of making the switch from Sony to Nikon. I've give this decision a lot of thought. I know that I'm sacrificing some features like very snappy autofocus and EyeAF as well as a much more mature line-up of lenses But I just love the feel of the Z7 in my hands and the IQ it produces.


I've been pretty impressed with the speed of AF in AF-S with adapted glass. My D850 is better in terms of continuous AF, but for me the Z7 is a compliment to my D850s, it's not a replacement.

It's a pretty awesome travel body for me though. Have been really impressed with the quality of images it produces with the 28 f1.4 and 58 f1.4.



Nov 06, 2018 at 01:18 PM
henry albert
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.25 #7 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


1bwana1 wrote:
DPReview has published their full review as well. Once again, it looks very balanced to me despite this forums early bashing.

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikon-z7

In general the full reviews I am seeing are very much in line with each other as far as strengths and weaknesses are concerned.


You must've read a different review than I did. The Z7 flunked some basic focusing tests.



Nov 06, 2018 at 01:26 PM
sungphoto
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.25 #8 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


henry albert wrote:
You must've read a different review than I did. The Z7 flunked some basic focusing tests.


It's hard to really say based on the fact that the Z7's focus modes are different enough from other mirrorless bodies that I think all of us are still figuring out how to get the most of out of it.

I've found that AF-S with adapted glass is great. Fast, snappy and accurate. AF-C with adapted glass didn't work well at all when I first got the body, but I've found that using the Single point plus 8 dynamic AF points around it (don't recall what that mode is called) in AF-C is about on par with the AF-C performance as the Fuji XT2 and x100F. Low light with adapted glass is a little slow, but accurate when it locks on, but again this is with all adapted glass so hard to say until I get my hands on the 35 f1.8S and 50 f1.8S. I have the 24-70 f4S at home (on vacation in Mexico now) but haven't been able to use it at all to compare performance in terms AF.

I think if you are coming from Fuji or the mark 2 sony bodies (speaking from personal experience), you'd be perfectly happy with the Z7's AF performance.

I've been shooting the Z7 pretty heavily and I've yet to run into buffer issues - so seems like Nikon made a good call going with the XQD. Snapbridge is much more reliable and a quicker to set up with the Z7 as well, which makes it great for travel. Skintones are great out of the camera, which is very important to me.

Is it perfect? No, but it's the only full frame mirrorless camera that gives us near native AF performance with FX lenses, which is a big reason why I got one.



Nov 06, 2018 at 01:52 PM
1bwana1
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.25 #9 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


henry albert wrote:
You must've read a different review than I did. The Z7 flunked some basic focusing tests.


No, I read the same review. Flunked is probably too strong a word. I think all the reviews are consistent on the pluses , and the deficiencies in AF and some other things with the Z7. As Snug has posted, there ways to shoot around these shortcomings, but in doing so you really give up many of the advanced features that make the mirrorless experience so compelling.

I agree with most of the reviews that the Z7 leads the industry in build quality, but has performance similar to first/second generation cameras from competitors. To me that meant that at the price Nikon set for the Z7, it was a poor value proposition at this time. Those are some of the primary reasons I returned mine.

My view is that looking at the latest financial results from Nikon, Canon, and Sony,the release of the Z Cameras from Nikon, and the R camera From Canon, were a forced defensive response. However, this is being shown to be very good for consumers. Sony has answered with a price reduction on their second generation A7RII which has performance most similar to Z &R cameras. With a nice quality native lense it is now under $1,000. A huge price/value difference. The competition in FF mirrorless will be fun to watch play out.




Nov 06, 2018 at 02:20 PM
cvrle59
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.25 #10 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


Nikon didn't deliver to make Sony and Fuji user base to turn their heads to new Z-line, and Nikon delivered to make existing F-mount user base to be concerned what the future of DSLR is.
It wasn't an easy decision for Nikon, how to get into all this.



Nov 06, 2018 at 02:32 PM
1bwana1
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.25 #11 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


cvrle59 wrote:
Nikon didn't deliver to make Sony and Fuji user base to turn their heads to new Z-line, and Nikon delivered to make existing F-mount user base to be concerned what the future of DSLR is.
It wasn't an easy decision for Nikon, how to get into all this.


We are in 100% agreement. That is why I refer to it as a defensive release. It was done to stop people from leaving F mount for other systems, not attract new users. Looking at the numbers they had to do something.




Nov 06, 2018 at 02:49 PM
sungphoto
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.25 #12 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


cvrle59 wrote:
Nikon didn't deliver to make Sony and Fuji user base to turn their heads to new Z-line, and Nikon delivered to make existing F-mount user base to be concerned what the future of DSLR is.
It wasn't an easy decision for Nikon, how to get into all this.


I agree, that Nikon's strategy with the Z7 is less to lure away shooters from other brands but simply to retain current Nikon shooters. That's a pretty great strategy though considering how large of an installed base Nikon has - it's much easier to keep existing users than switch users from other brands. Generally your cost per acquisition for "switchers" is going to be higher, so from a business standpoint, Nikon's approach makes 100% sense.

I think something that's not mentioned enough though is what a solid video body the Z7 is. I've been playing around with it on the Z7 and with the IBIS and great skintones, the footage looks great.

There's so much noise with youtube reviewers getting their panties in a bunch over some feature they claim they "need" to make pictures. Generally though, I hold little to no weight to the opinions of a "professional gear reviewer" that are actually pretty crap photographers (the Northrups, Jared Polins, Angry Photographers of the world).

Generally reviews from real, talented full time pro photographers that I respect (not full time gear reviewers) have been overwhelmingly positive of the Z7. One of my mentors is using it on the road photographing NFL and loves his (though he has pretty much every toy you can get from Nikon).



Nov 06, 2018 at 03:10 PM
JohnK007
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.25 #13 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


cvrle59 wrote:
Nikon didn't deliver to make Sony and Fuji user base to turn their heads to new Z-line, and Nikon delivered to make existing F-mount user base to be concerned what the future of DSLR is.
It wasn't an easy decision for Nikon, how to get into all this.


No, it's much more than this.

In addition to courting all existing Nikon users (remember, Nikon has more than twice as many existing as Sony has users, and 10x as many as existing Fuji users) ... Nikon also wants to let NEW, beginning users see what they offer as well.

This means, Nikon will preserve a greater number of users than Sony or Fuji has ever known ... as well as ADD new users who've not tried any.

With their superior future-forward mount .. plus superior build quality, superior EVF, superior base-ISO performance, and superior high-ISO performance ... Nikon will continue to add to their customer base at a rate Sony or Fuji will never equal.

Sony will always battle for 3rd place ... so the real question is, as mirrorless moves forward, will it be Nikon or Canon who winds up on top. If you check the numbers, Canon is slipping and Nikon is growing:

Nikon dominates World Press Photo 2018

Top 10 Cameras (72 entries total):


NIKON = 45
CANON = 27
SONY = 0
FUJI = 0
OLYMPUS = 0



Nov 06, 2018 at 03:12 PM
cvrle59
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.25 #14 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


JohnK007 wrote:
No, it's much more than this.

In addition to courting all existing Nikon users (remember, Nikon has more than twice as many existing as Sony has users, and 10x as many as existing Fuji users) ... Nikon also wants to let NEW, beginning users see what they offer as well.

This means, Nikon will preserve a greater number of users than Sony or Fuji has ever known ... as well as ADD new users who've not tried any.

With their superior future-forward mount .. plus superior build quality, superior EVF, superior base-ISO performance, and superior high-ISO performance ... Nikon will continue to add
...Show more

I have no problem to understand it, I've been patiently waiting for Z6, but my impression is that there is no as much excitement in existing Nikon user base as I would expect it.
I could be completely wrong, this isn't based on any kind of stats, just a look from aside on this whole thing, since announcement in September.




Nov 06, 2018 at 03:37 PM
JohnK007
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.25 #15 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


cvrle59 wrote:
I have no problem to understand it, I've been patiently waiting for Z6, but my impression is that there is no as much excitement in existing Nikon user base as I would expect it.



True, but that is because existing Nikon DSLRs exceed ALL mirrorless cameras in capability, 5-1, over any isolated advantage mirrorless offers.

If you have a D5, you already eclipse any mirrorless camera on earth (from any brand) for that segment. So why switch?
If you have a D850, you already eclipse any mirrorless camera on earth (from any brand) for that segment. So why switch?
If you have a D500, you already eclipse any mirrorless (or DSLR), from any brand, for that segment. So why switch?

No reason to switch to ANY brand, if you're a more modern Nikon DSLR user.

*However*, if you have Nikon cameras that are getting outdated (D300, D700, etc.), then you may very well be better off switching to the Z6 / Z7, so you can continue to enjoy your Nikkor glass.

Also, if you've never shot anything, and you're looking to get into photography, a quick study of the graph above is pretty much self-explanatory as to how it relates to the likelihood of your future success



Nov 06, 2018 at 03:57 PM
1bwana1
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.25 #16 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


You realize that you are quoting numbers for press people at a single event. Total sample size, 75 people. This is an infinitesimal small sample that has no relevance to the current market, and even less for the broader market going forward.

This from the website that published your data:

"That said, it's important to note that Photolari's 2017 graphs are based on only 36 out of 45 awarded photos. So while it's nice to compare 2017 to 2018 and draw grand conclusions about the camera market, this is probably more an exercise in bragging rights than an accurate representation of camera company health."

You do understand that Nikons share of the market has fallen to below 25% when it used to be 50% don't you?

If you want real, important statistics go look at the recent quarterly results from the major brands. Important stuff there. That is where the World's view is most accurately represented.

Then look at the Current sales numbers for FF ICL cameras. Sony is well in front, and #1 in the World. That is just fact. How do you figure that Nikon is adding at a faster rate. Not only are more new FF users not choosing the traditional brands, existing FF camera users are switching.

Yes, there are more users of the traditional brands. They have been selling cameras for decades. Sony became #1 in only 5 years.

I am not trying to promote Sony here, or even say that Sony cameras are better. I am just trying to discuss a major disruption happening in the FF ICL camera industry. Sony just happens to be the protagonist (or antagonist, you pick) in this disruption.

My view is that we will look back at this period in the same way we look back at the film/digital disruption. It will be nest for all of us if Nikon, Canon, and others camera companies remain financially healthy and produce great cameras going forward.

Edited on Nov 06, 2018 at 04:41 PM · View previous versions



Nov 06, 2018 at 04:10 PM
1bwana1
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.25 #17 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


JohnK007 wrote:
If you have a D5, you already eclipse any mirrorless camera on earth (from any brand) for that segment. So why switch?
If you have a D850, you already eclipse any mirrorless camera on earth (from any brand) for that segment. So why switch?
If you have a D500, you already eclipse any mirrorless (or DSLR), from any brand, for that segment. So why switch?



See you and I do agree an some things. 100% in the case of this statement. As far as raw capabilities of the camera are concerned.

If you own these cameras already, the only reasons to switch are size, weight, and some of the features of mirrorless that provide a a shooting experience that DSLR cannot provide.



Nov 06, 2018 at 04:17 PM
JohnK007
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.25 #18 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


1bwana1 wrote:
You realize that you are quoting numbers for press people at a single event. Total sample size, 75 people. This is an infinitesimal small sample that has no relevance to the current market, and even less for the broader market going forward.


The cream of the crop, though (i.e., the ones who matter) ...



1bwana1 wrote:
If you want real, important statistics go look at the recent quarterly results from the major brands. Important stuff there. That is where the World's view


Wrong. Sheer numbers, without regard to quality, is a fool's errand.

There are far more people in the world who are poor, uneducated, and 3rd world starving individuals ... than who are comfortable, successful, happy individuals ... but that doesn't mean one should strive for the greater percentage

Similarly, McDonald's restaurants outsell any 5 class restaurants, but that doesn't mean McDonald's is where you should take your family to eat



1bwana1 wrote:
Then look at the Current sales numbers for FF ICL cameras. Sony is well in front, and #1 in the World. That is just fact. How do you figure that Nikon adding at a faster rate. Not only are more new FF users not choosing the traditional brands, existing FF camera users are switching.


This is an intellectually-dishonest statement. Those figures were based on the fact Sony was the*ONLY* purveyor of FF Mirrorless cameras, until a month ago

Watch Sony's numbers plummet, not that Nikon and Canon have entered the race ...



1bwana1 wrote:
Yes, there are more users of the other brands. They have been selling cameras for decades. Sony became #1 in only 5 years.


Sony is #4, behind Canon, Olympus, and Fuji in ASPC mirrorless camera sales ...

Sony only became #1 in FF mirrorless sales the day they became the ONLY mirrorless FF option



1bwana1 wrote:
I am not trying to promote Sony here, or even say that Sony cameras are better. I am just trying to discuss a major disruption happening in the FF ICL camera industry. Sony just happens to be the protagonist (or antagonist, you pick) in this disruption.


You're just trying to stir the pot, with incomplete information.

As overall camera vendors, Sony is a far distant second to either Nikon or Canon. Sony's participation in world-class events, as a purveyor of the cameras that produced the world class images, is virtually nonexistent.



1bwana1 wrote:
My view is that we will look back at this period in the same way we look back at the film/digital disruption. It will be nest for all of us if Nikon, Canon, and others camera companies remain financially healthy and produce great cameras going forward.


Sony is responsible for many elements of positive innovation. They're doing better and gaining ground.

But they are nowhere near #1 in absolutely anything having to do with the finished product of photography. Canon and Nikon dwarf Sony in overall user base, and in particular professional user base.

Considering Canon outsells even Nikon 2-1, but Nikon produces the highest quality images in professional competitions, 2-1, that indicates odds of success in favor of Nikon users. Do the math.

Edited on Nov 06, 2018 at 04:31 PM · View previous versions



Nov 06, 2018 at 04:23 PM
Kry27
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.25 #19 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


Depends on how you understand 'eclipse in a segment'. Other priorities must be valuable in any segment not mentioned...


Nov 06, 2018 at 04:23 PM
sungphoto
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.25 #20 · Official Z Series Camera and Lens Discussion


I personally am completely over this whole brand war BS. Couldn’t care less who sold more product during a single month, don’t care what some dumbass on youtube thinks, and to a certain degree I don’t really care what anyone on this forum thinks.

In the end whether you like the Z7 should come from your personal usage and how it fits to your style and needs - not what the loudest person on a forum or YouTube says.

That said I dislike when people misrepresent sales numbers to try and support their point. The only recent stats that show Sony is “dominating” is during a very specific period of retail sales - a period where no other FF mirrorless or DSLR camera released. You could quote another sales chart and say that Nikon was the best selling camera during a certain period too, like when the D850 was released. Sales does not directly equate to installed base.

In a sense the world press stats are a better indicator of installed base because it shows actual users in the field. Also keeping in mind that the world press stats are for a competition where tens if not hundreds of thousands of photographers submitted their work - so those stats are likely representative of that larger population.

</rant>



Nov 06, 2018 at 04:50 PM
1       2       3              24              26              32       33       end




FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              24              26              32       33       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account