fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              32              34              194       195       end
  

Archive 2016 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread

  
 
golfinz
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #1 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


All I can say is, shit! For a hobbiest, I have no need for this, but I sure do want!


Aug 31, 2016 at 01:13 PM
Etherton
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #2 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


gfinlayson wrote:
ISO 100 vs ISO 3200, so not really apples with apples comparison.....


Lol, didn't even notice... that makes a difference.




Aug 31, 2016 at 01:15 PM
m.sommers00
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #3 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


agelessphotog wrote:
Is this a joke? why is there 5x as much grain in the 200 F2 photo's? and a car in the BG in the last one.


You guys are relentless

Joseph, thank you for posting photos! Some of us do appreciate it.



Aug 31, 2016 at 01:15 PM
popinvasion
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #4 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


Joseph. wrote:
My trinity is finally complete! I'm done fellas. Off to sunset to shoot happily ever after



Add a 20 1.8G to up the ante



Aug 31, 2016 at 01:38 PM
Elijah
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #5 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


Etherton wrote:
You buy too many expensive lenses...lol


I'd rather own expensive lenses that bring me moola than a car that will depreciate fast and impress no one...

Priorities man, priorities!



Aug 31, 2016 at 01:44 PM
agelessphotog
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #6 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


m.sommers00 wrote:
You guys are relentless

Joseph, thank you for posting photos! Some of us do appreciate it.


Shooting one at ISO 100 and the other at ISO 3200 That will make a huge difference. Also it would probably be a good idea to have the same backgrounds.

Edited on Aug 31, 2016 at 01:52 PM · View previous versions



Aug 31, 2016 at 01:51 PM
Hardcore
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #7 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


m.sommers00 wrote:
You guys are relentless

Joseph, thank you for posting photos! Some of us do appreciate it.


Yes, thank you Joseph!!



Aug 31, 2016 at 01:52 PM
Hardcore
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #8 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


agelessphotog wrote:
Shooting one at ISO 100 and the other at ISO 3200 That will make a huge difference. Also it would probably be a good idea to have the same backgrounds.


Then buy the 105mm and shoot a comparison for yourself. I'm sure your 200mm F2 will still be an amazing lens even if the 105mm is close. Don't let it bother you too much that a lens might be almost as good as the 200mm F2 or that some might actually even prefer it to the 200mm!

Edited on Aug 31, 2016 at 01:54 PM · View previous versions



Aug 31, 2016 at 01:53 PM
popinvasion
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #9 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


Looks like unless you enjoy bullhorns or need the reach-the 200F2 is now in a state of obsolescence-especially for portrait shooters. Nice!!!! Thanks @Joseph.

Edited on Aug 31, 2016 at 01:56 PM · View previous versions



Aug 31, 2016 at 01:53 PM
Hardcore
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #10 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


popinvasion wrote:
Looks like unless you enjoy bullhorns or need the reach the 200F2 is now in a state of obsolescence-especially for portrait shooters. Nice!!!!


Ya, there will always be a market for the 200mm F2 for sports and just pure corrected sharpness & contrast but I can't see it staying in my camera bag for long....



Aug 31, 2016 at 01:55 PM
Dorseylane
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #11 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


Can someone take a portrait really tight and see where the falloff starts ?


Aug 31, 2016 at 01:59 PM
Chris Dees
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #12 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


Joseph. wrote:
My trinity is finally complete! I'm done fellas. Off to sunset to shoot happily ever after



My trinity is a tad different.







Aug 31, 2016 at 02:05 PM
m.sommers00
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #13 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


More photos here on Flickr with cross-over between. Not exactly great stuff...yet!

https://www.flickr.com/groups/nikon105mmf14/

https://www.flickr.com/groups/3038285@N22/



Aug 31, 2016 at 02:16 PM
agelessphotog
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #14 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


Hardcore wrote:
Then buy the 105mm and shoot a comparison for yourself. I'm sure your 200mm F2 will still be an amazing lens even if the 105mm is close. Don't let it bother you too much that a lens might be almost as good as the 200mm F2 or that some might actually even prefer it to the 200mm!


Shew, calm down. I'm just pointing out the obvious that it's not a good comparison if you shoot at ISO 100 on the 105 and at ISO 3200 on the 200.

Edited on Aug 31, 2016 at 02:30 PM · View previous versions



Aug 31, 2016 at 02:26 PM
Joseph.
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #15 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


agelessphotog wrote:
Is this a joke? why is there 5x as much grain in the 200 F2 photo's? and a car in the BG in the last one.


Send me your 200 f/2 and I'll do a side-by side. I don't have that lens anymore, so I just picked up the most similar shots I could find.

But I will tell you this again.. This 105 1.4E is AMAZING!! Sooo happy I sold my 200 f/2.



Aug 31, 2016 at 02:27 PM
Joseph.
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #16 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


agelessphotog wrote:
Lol, and cars in the background in the 200 shots.


The FACT that you saw a car on the 200 f/2 background just confirms the 200 f/2 is not the cream machine most people make it out to be just sayin...



Aug 31, 2016 at 02:32 PM
Elijah
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #17 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


Joseph. wrote:
But I will tell you this again.. This 105 1.4E is AMAZING!! Sooo happy I sold my 200 f/2.


I concur.



Aug 31, 2016 at 02:34 PM
Joseph.
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #18 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


agelessphotog wrote:
Shew, calm down. I'm just pointing out the obvious that it's not a good comparison if you shoot at ISO 100 on the 105 and at ISO 3200 on the 200.


Actually, it's a fair comparison. ISO has nothing to do with BG blur... all it does is add noise. Plus, the Df and D4 have the same sensor. Are you really in this much state of disbelief that a 105 1.4 can hang with a 200 f/2? I understand some people still believe the earth is flat, but man..wake up! it's 2016.. this is cutting edge technology right here. FASTEST 105 in production. Just amazing piece of glass. Don't fight it man, go with the flow and enjoy what we got.



Aug 31, 2016 at 02:40 PM
Dj R
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.33 #19 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


Joseph. wrote:
But I will tell you this again.. This 105 1.4E is AMAZING!! Sooo happy I sold my 200 f/2.


Elijah wrote:
I concur.


no need to inflame the 200 f/2 guys
anyone who spends that much on a lens, is prone to being a little sensitive.

200 f2 vs 105 f1.4
they are completely different tools
similar to RPG vs M16.

one can do a little more damage than the other, but both are dangerous.

one is a little easier to manage on a daily basis.

therefore, the 105e may become the new "go-to" special weapon for the mobile guys. guys who shoot weddings and engagement sessions, people who shoot their families, or do portrait sessions with kids (who don't want to be so far away).

I think of it as the 85L
while the 85 1.4g is amazing, it doesn't have that "it" factor.
the 105e does, it's just special.

main take away regarding the 105e is that it has the swirl and bokeh of the 58mm 1.4g, but the 105e is sharper wide open.







Aug 31, 2016 at 02:43 PM
popinvasion
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.33 #20 · Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread


Dj R wrote:
no need to inflame the 200 f/2 guys
anyone who spends that much on a lens, is prone to being a little sensitive.

200 f2 vs 105 f1.4
they are completely different tools
similar to RPG vs M16.

one can do a little more damage than the other, but both are dangerous.

one is a little easier to manage on a daily basis.

therefore, the 105e may become the new "go-to" special weapon for the mobile guys. guys who shoot weddings and engagement sessions, people who shoot their families, or do portrait sessions with kids (who don't want to be so far away).

I think of
...Show more

To be fair many of these 200/2 defenders are just fearful that the "momographers" will be able to compete without owning the more $$$ glass-I get it and sympathize-but I doubt many of the "momographers" will even justify the $2200. I think the concern is overblown. Fools be momographers competing



Aug 31, 2016 at 02:49 PM
1       2       3              32              34              194       195       end




FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              32              34              194       195       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account