Hardcore wrote: agelessphotog wrote: m.sommers00 wrote: agelessphotog wrote:
Is this a joke? why is there 5x as much grain in the 200 F2 photo\'s? and a car in the BG in the last one.
You guys are relentless
Joseph, thank you for posting photos! Some of us do appreciate it.
Shooting one at ISO 100 and the other at ISO 3200 That will make a huge difference. Also it would probably be a good idea to have the same backgrounds.
Then buy the 105mm and shoot a comparison for yourself. I\'m sure your 200mm F2 will still be an amazing lens even if the 105mm is close. Don\'t let it bother you too much that a lens might be almost as good as the 200mm F2 or that some might actually even prefer it to the 200mm!
Shew. Calm down. I\'m just pointing out the obvious that it\'s not a good comparison if you shoot at ISO 100 on the 105 and at ISO 3200 on the 200.
Aug 31, 2016 at 02:26 PM
Previous versions of agelessphotog's message #13703543 « Nikon 105mm f/1.4E ED Image Thread »
That will make a huge difference. Also it would probably be a good idea to have the same backgrounds.