Arrived in Korea yesterday with with my two kids and wife.
A good 20 hours of no sleep, no eating, and no drinking.
Daughter playing with play-doh in the KTX train. DSC_1728 by Tommy Yoo, on Flickr
KTX Train DSC_1735 by Tommy Yoo, on Flickr
I'd go back to using my D700 if I had a way on transferring shots from the camera to my phone. I have the D850 and I love that feature. Use it quite a bit. But the colors on the D700 are the best on any camera I have owned.
Its possible with an android phone. Probably iphone too
MRM4 wrote:
I'd go back to using my D700 if I had a way on transferring shots from the camera to my phone. I have the D850 and I love that feature. Use it quite a bit. But the colors on the D700 are the best on any camera I have owned.
I look at my album and saw a lot of pet shots taken with D700 and AF 85/1.4D (purchased in D70 era and I still shoot a film back then) years ago and I still like those photos (1🐶1🐱 are gone)
Dug up the 2 ancient artifacts today and took them with me when I walk my dog(Brandy). He is very energetic and not very obedient, it's difficult for me to take good shot of him.
ChrisCoy wrote:
Do y'all think the D700 will ever become invalid/irrelevant/phased out? Or will it be one of those models that no matter how old it is it's still worth keeping around? Like picking up one of the old, but classically comfortable Nikon film models?
And the second part of that question is, do y'all think technology will ever NOT support the D700? For instance, editing software - do you think they will always support legacy camera profiles?
I think not. The image output has a very specific look to it. As long as you aren't pushing the iso too much and have enough lighting, the output is great and can't be easily reproduced with modern cameras.
Maybe someone with experience in LR can say if Adobe has stopped adding support for cameras they previously were supporting after an update. I don't see why it would cost them much to continue to port over existing profiles as updates are developed.
