Sony FE Images Thread
p.1990 #2Sony FE Images Thread
Nice photographs everyone. Love Joshuas glass frog and Werners "San Salvatore". Beautiful shots!
Here´s one from my Christmas holiday to Bulgaria.
Sunrise by Johannes Hüttner, auf Flickr
A7R L35/2 F16 1/60 ISO100
Here´s one from my Christmas holiday to Bulgaria.
A7R L35/2 F16 1/60 ISO100
Jan 04, 2017 at 02:56 AM
p.1990 #3Sony FE Images Thread
#1 CY 35-70/3.4, a7r. #2 CY 100/3.5, a7r. Autumn in Tibet feels like paradise.
power makes a difference at 4500m in 40 below.
power makes a difference at 4500m in 40 below.
Jan 04, 2017 at 04:10 AM
p.1990 #4Sony FE Images Thread
Membler wrote:
Sony A7 + Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100mm f/2 by Ronny Olsson, on FlickrZeiss should be paying you a commission for selling so many of their Makro-Planar 100mm f/2 lenses. I know I've been tempted many times by you! Amazing...
Mike
Thanks Mike.. you too kind
Sony A7 + Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100mm f/2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Ronny Olsson wrote
https://c3.staticflickr.com/1/640/31927904842_6870d45a91_h.jpgSony A7 + Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100mm f/2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Mike
Thanks Mike.. you too kind
Sony A7 + Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100mm f/2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Jan 04, 2017 at 04:40 AM
p.1990 #5Sony FE Images Thread
darbo wrote:
I swore I wouldn't buy this lens because of it's size (having bought and sold the FE35/1.4) but I decided to give it a try thanks in part to the images posted here. Now to test the lens and it's weight/size to see if it stays . . .Looks great Bob. Then again your skills make any lens look amazing.
You are too kind but thanks!
rji2goleez wrote
An exciting day for me but boring pictures. My Sony 24-70/2.8 GM arrived today but I got home light was fading and the temperature dropping to zero F. Nonetheless, here's a few snaps just to make sure it produces images! I swore I wouldn't buy this lens because of it's size (having bought and sold the FE35/1.4) but I decided to give it a try thanks in part to the images posted here. Now to test the lens and it's weight/size to see if it stays . . .
You are too kind but thanks!
Jan 04, 2017 at 04:42 AM
p.1990 #6Sony FE Images Thread
Photo taken at 9:49 AM
Looking at Dark Hollow Falls. A storm had dumped 16 inches of rain on the Park weeks before and the water was abnormally high. But, without the leaves of spring the image did not have the softer and more diffuse light.
Cropped tripod mounted A7r and Leica M WATE set to 21mm
ISO 50, f8, 0.4 second
Exposure corrected by +0.12 Stops; processed in LR6.4
October 19, 2015
At Shenandoah National Park, Virginia
Rich
Looking at Dark Hollow Falls. A storm had dumped 16 inches of rain on the Park weeks before and the water was abnormally high. But, without the leaves of spring the image did not have the softer and more diffuse light.
Cropped tripod mounted A7r and Leica M WATE set to 21mm
ISO 50, f8, 0.4 second
Exposure corrected by +0.12 Stops; processed in LR6.4
October 19, 2015
At Shenandoah National Park, Virginia
Rich
Jan 04, 2017 at 06:22 AM
p.1990 #7Sony FE Images Thread
xwing15 wrote:
and an other wow for you Joshua
Rene, thank you very much! And yours are always amazing!
Roshisan wrote:
Nice photographs everyone. Love Joshuas glass frog and Werners "San Salvatore". Beautiful shots!
Here´s one from my Christmas holiday to Bulgaria.
Thank you very much, Johannes! It looks like Bulgaria is a great spot for photography - excellent image!
**************************************
Here is the flip side of the same glass frog on glass as in the previous page. I got a stiff neck afterwards but what don't we do for the sake of photographic art.... and a little bit of frog anatomy lesson?
Glass frog on glass from the bottom
Edited on Jan 04, 2017 at 11:04 AM · View previous versions
and an other wow for you Joshua
Rene, thank you very much! And yours are always amazing!
Roshisan wrote:
Nice photographs everyone. Love Joshuas glass frog and Werners "San Salvatore". Beautiful shots!
Here´s one from my Christmas holiday to Bulgaria.
Thank you very much, Johannes! It looks like Bulgaria is a great spot for photography - excellent image!
**************************************
Here is the flip side of the same glass frog on glass as in the previous page. I got a stiff neck afterwards but what don't we do for the sake of photographic art.... and a little bit of frog anatomy lesson
? |
||
 © AGeoJO 2017 |
||
 |
Glass frog on glass from the bottom
Edited on Jan 04, 2017 at 11:04 AM · View previous versions
Jan 04, 2017 at 07:49 AM
p.1990 #8Sony FE Images Thread
rji2goleez wrote:
An exciting day for me but boring pictures. My Sony 24-70/2.8 GM arrived today but I got home light was fading and the temperature dropping to zero F. Nonetheless, here's a few snaps just to make sure it produces images!
I swore I wouldn't buy this lens because of it's size (having bought and sold the FE35/1.4) but I decided to give it a try thanks in part to the images posted here. Now to test the lens and it's weight/size to see if it stays . . .
Congrats, Bob. Let us know how you feel about your newest acquisition after having given it a work out.
Joshua, Rene, Werner and Ronny: Amazing work, gentlemen.
An exciting day for me but boring pictures. My Sony 24-70/2.8 GM arrived today but I got home light was fading and the temperature dropping to zero F. Nonetheless, here's a few snaps just to make sure it produces images!
I swore I wouldn't buy this lens because of it's size (having bought and sold the FE35/1.4) but I decided to give it a try thanks in part to the images posted here. Now to test the lens and it's weight/size to see if it stays . . .
Congrats, Bob. Let us know how you feel about your newest acquisition after having given it a work out.
Joshua, Rene, Werner and Ronny: Amazing work, gentlemen.
Jan 04, 2017 at 08:39 AM
p.1990 #9Sony FE Images Thread
Thanks
Trying to edit some b/w pictures from Iceland to be printed
Would such a image work to put on the wall at home ?
I barely have none printed shots
How do you guys do ? Are you printing many pictures ?
Sony A7 + Nikkor 16mm f3.5 AI fisheye by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Trying to edit some b/w pictures from Iceland to be printed
Would such a image work to put on the wall at home ?
I barely have none printed shots
How do you guys do ? Are you printing many pictures ?
Sony A7 + Nikkor 16mm f3.5 AI fisheye by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Jan 04, 2017 at 10:50 AM
p.1990 #10Sony FE Images Thread
Ronny Olsson wrote:
Thanks
Trying to edit some b/w pictures from Iceland to be printed
Would such a image work to put on the wall at home ?
I barely have none printed shots
How do you guys do ? Are you printing many pictures ?
https://c3.staticflickr.com/1/318/31727323610_aa2e62d60a_h.jpg
Sony A7 + Nikkor 16mm f3.5 AI fisheye by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
I can't give you advice on whether that is an appropriate image or not. That's a personal and artistic choice of what you want staring you in the face day after day.
Personally, I've taken down all my photo murals, all from my 4x5 film era, and replaced with self-mocking abstract oil paintings. And few of those, since refinishing and painting the walls.
I never print and no longer go to photo labs that used to print my work and feature in their lobbies.
I wouldn't know how to pick a photo(s) that I want to look at all the time, or pay for it instead of a nice lens.
I continue to be an outlier, so not much help! I'm sure you'll get better advice. Good luck deciding!
Good opportunity to try my new toy: Pentax SMC-M 28/3.5 @ f/8! 2-shot landscape stacked pano, LRCC.
Thanks
Trying to edit some b/w pictures from Iceland to be printed
Would such a image work to put on the wall at home ?
I barely have none printed shots
How do you guys do ? Are you printing many pictures ?
https://c3.staticflickr.com/1/318/31727323610_aa2e62d60a_h.jpg
Sony A7 + Nikkor 16mm f3.5 AI fisheye by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
I can't give you advice on whether that is an appropriate image or not. That's a personal and artistic choice of what you want staring you in the face day after day.
Personally, I've taken down all my photo murals, all from my 4x5 film era, and replaced with self-mocking abstract oil paintings. And few of those, since refinishing and painting the walls.
I never print and no longer go to photo labs that used to print my work and feature in their lobbies.
I wouldn't know how to pick a photo(s) that I want to look at all the time, or pay for it instead of a nice lens.
I continue to be an outlier, so not much help! I'm sure you'll get better advice. Good luck deciding!
Good opportunity to try my new toy: Pentax SMC-M 28/3.5 @ f/8!
2-shot landscape stacked pano, LRCC. Jan 04, 2017 at 11:48 AM
|
p.1990 #12Sony FE Images Thread
Ronny Olsson wrote:
Thanks
Trying to edit some b/w pictures from Iceland to be printed
Would such a image work to put on the wall at home ?
I barely have none printed shots
How do you guys do ? Are you printing many pictures ?
https://c3.staticflickr.com/1/318/31727323610_aa2e62d60a_h.jpg
Sony A7 + Nikkor 16mm f3.5 AI fisheye by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
I print some but not much. It has to be a wall worthy image . . . Such as this one! Consider a metal print! I've done metal glossy prints with black and whites and they simply pop!
Thanks
Trying to edit some b/w pictures from Iceland to be printed
Would such a image work to put on the wall at home ?
I barely have none printed shots
How do you guys do ? Are you printing many pictures ?
https://c3.staticflickr.com/1/318/31727323610_aa2e62d60a_h.jpg
Sony A7 + Nikkor 16mm f3.5 AI fisheye by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
I print some but not much. It has to be a wall worthy image . . . Such as this one! Consider a metal print! I've done metal glossy prints with black and whites and they simply pop!
Jan 04, 2017 at 12:00 PM
p.1990 #13Sony FE Images Thread
Thanks guys
Actually I had probably thought little more "abstract" images
hmm.. it's hard
I never think that my pictures are very good
I am thinking they are ok ....but not WOW
and I'm never completely satisfied
Perhaps this style fits better
Sony A7 + Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZF 2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Sony A7 + Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZF 2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Sony A7 + Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZF 2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Sony A7 +Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZF 2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Actually I had probably thought little more "abstract" images
hmm.. it's hard
I never think that my pictures are very good
I am thinking they are ok ....but not WOW
and I'm never completely satisfied
Perhaps this style fits better
Sony A7 + Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZF 2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Sony A7 + Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZF 2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Sony A7 + Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZF 2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Sony A7 +Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZF 2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Jan 04, 2017 at 12:31 PM
p.1990 #14Sony FE Images Thread
A72+Canon nFD 200/4.0
A7R+Canon 55-250/4.5-5.6
A7R+Canon 15-85/3.5-5.6
A7R+Canon 55-250/4.5-5.6
A7R+Canon 15-85/3.5-5.6
Jan 04, 2017 at 12:32 PM
p.1990 #15Sony FE Images Thread
This post represents an interesting experiment. I like Lightroom CC quite a lot but I have automated droplets for resizing and use LR mogrify for framing. So while I can do a lot of editing with Lightroom Mobile, it's difficult to post here from LR mobile. However, my edits on LR mobile sync back to my desktop. So this post is being done remotely using Team Viewer. This software allows me remote access to my desktop from my ipad. So, I can run my resizing and export with framing remotely. It's a little cluncky but it works!
Jan 04, 2017 at 01:09 PM
p.1990 #16Sony FE Images Thread
Ronny Olsson wrote:
Thanks guys
Actually I had probably thought little more "abstract" images
hmm.. it's hard
I never think that my pictures are very good
I am thinking they are ok ....but not WOW
and I'm never completely satisfied
Perhaps this style fits better
https://c7.staticflickr.com/9/8340/28905725646_e7e3ceb4f8_h.jpg
Sony A7 + Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZF 2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/718/31628097080_2f8e0845b6_h.jpg
Sony A7 + Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZF 2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
https://c3.staticflickr.com/8/7399/26214585474_ad29ca1918_h.jpg
Sony A7 + Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZF 2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
https://c5.staticflickr.com/6/5732/30556464404_051871e7db_h.jpg
Sony A7 +Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZF 2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
I rather like the first one of these four. It's quite abstract, but anchored in reality by the rocks and pebbles.
If it were me, I'd very slightly exaggerate the dynamic "push/pull" of (very) slightly more saturated cool blue color on the top, and make the bottom section slightly warmer tint -- like the color of Raw Umber (almost a true cast bronze color -- deep, deep, dark yellow-brown -- almost with a hint of yellow-green; almost a sepia, but not so far as orange-based). Basically just what you have here but a very equalized cool/warm balance (unless your house works better with a blue/grey balance).
You asked!
Thanks guys
Actually I had probably thought little more "abstract" images
hmm.. it's hard
I never think that my pictures are very good
I am thinking they are ok ....but not WOW
and I'm never completely satisfied
Perhaps this style fits better
https://c7.staticflickr.com/9/8340/28905725646_e7e3ceb4f8_h.jpg
Sony A7 + Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZF 2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/718/31628097080_2f8e0845b6_h.jpg
Sony A7 + Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZF 2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
https://c3.staticflickr.com/8/7399/26214585474_ad29ca1918_h.jpg
Sony A7 + Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZF 2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
https://c5.staticflickr.com/6/5732/30556464404_051871e7db_h.jpg
Sony A7 +Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21 ZF 2 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
I rather like the first one of these four. It's quite abstract, but anchored in reality by the rocks and pebbles.
If it were me, I'd very slightly exaggerate the dynamic "push/pull" of (very) slightly more saturated cool blue color on the top, and make the bottom section slightly warmer tint -- like the color of Raw Umber (almost a true cast bronze color -- deep, deep, dark yellow-brown -- almost with a hint of yellow-green; almost a sepia, but not so far as orange-based). Basically just what you have here but a very equalized cool/warm balance (unless your house works better with a blue/grey balance).
You asked!
Jan 04, 2017 at 01:38 PM
p.1990 #17Sony FE Images Thread
Chris_88 wrote:
Joshua, Rene, Werner and Ronny: Amazing work, gentlemen.
Chris, thank you very much!
This should be the last image from the Keyhole rock at Pfeiffer Beach - with the starburst, at least. The size of the starburst is definitely smaller as the sun was about to disappear. Actually, for all I know, it disappeared in the last few exposures of this image taken with the SRA. My better half preferred the image without the SRA where the splashing waves were visible. It looks more realistic according to her. Oh, well.
Keyhole rock at Pfeiffer Beach, Big Sur, California
Joshua, Rene, Werner and Ronny: Amazing work, gentlemen.
Chris, thank you very much!
This should be the last image from the Keyhole rock at Pfeiffer Beach - with the starburst, at least. The size of the starburst is definitely smaller as the sun was about to disappear. Actually, for all I know, it disappeared in the last few exposures of this image taken with the SRA. My better half preferred the image without the SRA where the splashing waves were visible. It looks more realistic according to her. Oh, well
. |
||
 © AGeoJO 2017 |
||
|
Keyhole rock at Pfeiffer Beach, Big Sur, California
Jan 04, 2017 at 01:39 PM
p.1990 #18Sony FE Images Thread
Chris_88 wrote:
Joshua, Rene, Werner and Ronny: Amazing work, gentlemen.
+ millions
Joshua, Rene, Werner and Ronny: Amazing work, gentlemen.
+ millions
Jan 04, 2017 at 01:45 PM
p.1990 #19Sony FE Images Thread
AGeoJO wrote:
Chris, thank you very much!
This should be the last image from the Keyhole rock at Pfeiffer Beach - with the starburst, at least. The size of the starburst is definitely smaller as the sun was about to disappear. Actually, for all I know, it disappeared in the last few exposures of this image taken with the SRA. My better half preferred the image without the SRA where the splashing waves were visible. It looks more realistic according to her. Oh, well.
Beautiful Joshua. Love the sunburst. Looks like the 24-70mm GM makes a superb all-around landscape lens.
Chris_88 wrote
Joshua, Rene, Werner and Ronny: Amazing work, gentlemen.This should be the last image from the Keyhole rock at Pfeiffer Beach - with the starburst, at least. The size of the starburst is definitely smaller as the sun was about to disappear. Actually, for all I know, it disappeared in the last few exposures of this image taken with the SRA. My better half preferred the image without the SRA where the splashing waves were visible. It looks more realistic according to her. Oh, well
.Beautiful Joshua. Love the sunburst. Looks like the 24-70mm GM makes a superb all-around landscape lens.
Jan 04, 2017 at 01:49 PM
p.1990 #20Sony FE Images Thread
mttran wrote:
+ millions
Thank you, Michael!
darbo wrote:
Chris, thank you very much!
This should be the last image from the Keyhole rock at Pfeiffer Beach - with the starburst, at least. The size of the starburst is definitely smaller as the sun was about to disappear. Actually, for all I know, it disappeared in the last few exposures of this image taken with the SRA. My better half preferred the image without the SRA where the splashing waves were visible. It looks more realistic according to her. Oh, well.Beautiful Joshua. Love the sunburst. Looks like the 24-70mm GM makes a superb all-around landscape lens.
David, I appreciate your kind words! Yes, like here, the zoom lens made it possible to change the coverage at ease. In this case, it was the 3 layers of folks behind me that would prevent using the foot zoom. IMHO, it is one of the best zoom lenses out there for the Sony E-mount and the other one was used for the image below.
I anticipated the wave to crash on some boulders between the keyhole and my position alright but I got lucky as when it did, the very low sun casted such a warm glow on the splash. The waves varied in intensity and that sizable splash happened just that one time during that fairly brief period. Well, it splashed a few more times after that one time but without the sun glow, which lasted maybe for about a minute or so. Better be lucky than good, I always say, in golf but apparently also in photography and for sure, in life.
Glowing splash!
Chris_88 wrote
Joshua, Rene, Werner and Ronny: Amazing work, gentlemen. Thank you, Michael!
darbo wrote:
AGeoJO wrote
Chris_88 wrote
Joshua, Rene, Werner and Ronny: Amazing work, gentlemen.This should be the last image from the Keyhole rock at Pfeiffer Beach - with the starburst, at least. The size of the starburst is definitely smaller as the sun was about to disappear. Actually, for all I know, it disappeared in the last few exposures of this image taken with the SRA. My better half preferred the image without the SRA where the splashing waves were visible. It looks more realistic according to her. Oh, well
.David, I appreciate your kind words! Yes, like here, the zoom lens made it possible to change the coverage at ease. In this case, it was the 3 layers of folks behind me that would prevent using the foot zoom
. IMHO, it is one of the best zoom lenses out there for the Sony E-mount and the other one was used for the image below.I anticipated the wave to crash on some boulders between the keyhole and my position alright but I got lucky as when it did, the very low sun casted such a warm glow on the splash. The waves varied in intensity and that sizable splash happened just that one time during that fairly brief period. Well, it splashed a few more times after that one time but without the sun glow, which lasted maybe for about a minute or so. Better be lucky than good, I always say, in golf but apparently also in photography and for sure, in life
. |
||
 © AGeoJO 2017 |
||
|
Glowing splash!
Jan 04, 2017 at 02:24 PM