This is similar to an image I posted about 100 pages ago on this thread.
The difference is that image was taken with the Canon 24mm TS-E, and this one is taken with my new Tokina 17mm f3.5 AT-X Pro in Sony mount. The edges & corners are not great, but it is wiiiiiide.
I think the lens is a keeper because it's small & light, distortion is mostly easy-to-correct barrel distortion, very little vignetting, and the centers at least are razor sharp.
ebrandon wrote:
This is similar to an image I posted about 100 pages ago on this thread.
The difference is that image was taken with the Canon 24mm TS-E, and this one is taken with my new Tokina 17mm f3.5 AT-X Pro in Sony mount. The edges & corners are not great, but it is wiiiiiide.
Is that an E mount lens or do you need to use an adaptor?
Another Atlanta cityscape. This time from Piedmont Park looking over the lake at Midtown Atlanta. I really like the FE 55 for this kind of shot. 20 Second exposure at F 5.6 with polarizer.
Really starting to like the results more and more with A7+ CV 40 Nokton...
A bunch of shots, mostly SOOC with maybe a little highlight/exposure compensation
Thanks for looking,
Gregg
tol1l1yboy wrote:
Is that an E mount lens or do you need to use an adaptor?
It's an Alpha mount lens, on a LA-EA4 adapter. Going forward, since the AF isn't very accurate, I'm going to use this lens manually focused on an LA-EA3 adapter.
Greggf wrote:
Really starting to like the results more and more with A7+ CV 40 Nokton...
A bunch of shots, mostly SOOC with maybe a little highlight/exposure compensation
Thanks for looking,
Gregg
Sweet, looks mega sharp. But the blur looks super busy. Does it clean up at all at f/2? I love the size of that lens compared to my 35/2 Biogon but that blur is aggressive.
edit: didn't mean aggressive in necessarily a terrible way, just different, btw.
Might as well post a few more. A7, 50/1.5 Sonnar. What a lens! It honestly might be taking over my Mk3+50L. Not for work, but for walkaround, amazing.