Hey Jordan
Ha Ha ... the short answer is No. Truth be told, I have succumbed to peer pressure! All by buddies but one are now shooting with the A7RII and I am being called a Nancy-boy (aka girlie man) for sticking with m43. But you know what? The m43 is more camera than I will ever need, and its capabilities far exceed my photographic skills set. So why do I need a larger sensor and more pixels? Well, I really don't.
So what's changed? 2 things - the size of the Sony FF bodies and the quality of the sensor - the DR is just insane and the size and bulk was what prompted me to move away from the DSLR to m43, as I do quite a bit of travel photography and I just cannot deal with the bulk/weight. And FF lenses are getting smaller and lighter as well. Heck, the Batis 85/1.8 is almost the same size and weight as the Nocticron ... and it's less expensive!
Having said that, I am still having problems dealing with the size/weight and price of DSLR or FF super-tele lenses i.e. upwards of 300mm. And this is where m43 (to me) will have a significant advantage over FF/DSLR. I am planning to get either the Olympus 300/4 or Panasonic-Leica 100-400 zoom for my E-M1.
Cheers,
Bobby
Jman13 wrote:
Bobby..leaving m4/3?