Fred Miranda wrote:
Puerto Vallarta, Mexico
I captured this by the beach close to my hotel. What an amazing place!
This was a 3-bracketed photo taken with my FE 16-35/4.
Which one do you prefer?
Fred, both are outstanding!
The highlights are better controlled in #2, but there is a little more shadow detail in #1, i would give the edge to # 2 because i am a stickler for empty spots or open spaces in the clouds great work!
Fred Miranda wrote:
Puerto Vallarta, Mexico
I captured this by the beach close to my hotel. What an amazing place!
This was a 3-bracketed photo taken with my FE 16-35/4.
Which one do you prefer?
Outstanding Fred! My preference goes to the second one for the pop of color and reflection on the water. Either one is a wall hanger!
Joshua, great to see you back Great shots. I have to thank you for your series with the ZA 135/1.8 with the LA-4 that tempted me to try it. For portraits this lens setup with the A7rII is awesome. I never been able to hand hold a 135mm lens to 1/15sec.
Also to Phillip with his great blogs on the ZA 135/1.8 and LA-4.
Fred superb shots! Personally I love the second, but for mood and subtlety I would choose 1 for the wall
Going through some backup drives and finding stuff I had missed. Last January in Seattle on the eve of the Superbowl. From the #skyviewobservatory atop the Columbia Center
Fred, I, too, am split between the composition and look of the water on #1, and the sky and light on #2. If I can have but one, I'll take #2. But I love both!
philber wrote:
Fred, I, too, am split between the composition and look of the water on #1, and the sky and light on #2. If I can have but one, I'll take #2. But I love both!
Fred Miranda wrote:
Puerto Vallarta, Mexico
I captured this by the beach close to my hotel. What an amazing place!
This was a 3-bracketed photo taken with my FE 16-35/4.
great work! 
