p.83 #2Our prayers have been answered: Nex-FF in 2 months
I bet that both Canon and Nikon have been testing their own FF mirrorless recipes for quite a while but, for the time being, they're keeping the kitchen doors well locked to unwelcome eyes.
p.83 #3Our prayers have been answered: Nex-FF in 2 months
Tariq, the lighter load may be, for some of us, just the tip of the iceberg. Shifting from 5D III + Zeiss to NEX 7 + Leica or Zeiss has resulted in being able to take my camera everywhere I go; Which in turn has resulted in many delightful shots I would have had to pass on or shoot with my cellphone otherwise. A7r means I can combine this "take it everywhere" ability with top-notch IQ. I can both have my cake and eat it. Can't wait to get my hands on it!
p.83 #7Our prayers have been answered: Nex-FF in 2 months
uhoh7 wrote: ISO1600 wroteunfortunately they are just their normal lenses with extensions on the rear so you don't need an adapter.sure, but now they will AF, without bulky sony adapter---but maybe that adapter gives better AF.
I don't believe that those Samyang lenses AF at all.
p.83 #8Our prayers have been answered: Nex-FF in 2 months
uhoh7 wrote: ISO1600 wroteunfortunately they are just their normal lenses with extensions on the rear so you don't need an adapter.sure, but now they will AF, without bulky sony adapter---but maybe that adapter gives better AF.
p.83 #9Our prayers have been answered: Nex-FF in 2 months
douglasf13 wrote: uhoh7 wroteISO1600 wroteunfortunately they are just their normal lenses with extensions on the rear so you don't need an adapter.sure, but now they will AF, without bulky sony adapter---but maybe that adapter gives better AF.I don't believe that those Samyang lenses AF at all.
They do if you rename your your thumb "A" and your forefinger "F" on your left hand. If you really want to go all in on that joke, you'd have the letters tattooed on your thumb and finger tips.
p.83 #10Our prayers have been answered: Nex-FF in 2 months
john_edwards wrote: ebrandon wroteDoes anyone know the differences between the Metabones EF->NEX adapters versions II and III well enough to predict whether a version II will work with the A7?I emailed Metabones last month and they said version three is needed. I have no idea what the difference is.
John
Thanks for the info. Just ordered it.
I'm incredibly excited about using the 24mm and 90mm Tilt Shift lenses with focus peaking.
And I think the 70-200mm f4 IS will be the perfect tele solution, especially because of the IS.
p.83 #11Our prayers have been answered: Nex-FF in 2 months
ISO1600 wrote:
unfortunately they are just their normal lenses with extensions on the rear so you don't need an adapter.
True, but there's probably an advantage to factory designed and installed extensions over an adapter in regards to decentering and consistency of thickness.
p.83 #12Our prayers have been answered: Nex-FF in 2 months
freaklikeme wrote: douglasf13 wroteuhoh7 wroteISO1600 wroteunfortunately they are just their normal lenses with extensions on the rear so you don't need an adapter.sure, but now they will AF, without bulky sony adapter---but maybe that adapter gives better AF.I don't believe that those Samyang lenses AF at all.They do if you rename your your thumb "A" and your forefinger "F" on your left hand. If you really want to go all in on that joke, you'd have the letters tattooed on your thumb and finger tips.
p.83 #13Our prayers have been answered: Nex-FF in 2 months
the review link from sina mentioned that shutter feel is sloppier on A7R. he also mention 35mm Zeiss seems make 35cron ASPH redundant. (hopefully, he meant it for performance) 21mm zm has red edge on A7R.
I accidentally sold XD-7 my farther gave me, now I bought its modern version back
p.83 #14Our prayers have been answered: Nex-FF in 2 months
douglasf13 wrote: freaklikeme wrotedouglasf13 wroteuhoh7 wroteISO1600 wroteunfortunately they are just their normal lenses with extensions on the rear so you don't need an adapter.sure, but now they will AF, without bulky sony adapter---but maybe that adapter gives better AF.I don't believe that those Samyang lenses AF at all.They do if you rename your your thumb "A" and your forefinger "F" on your left hand. If you really want to go all in on that joke, you'd have the letters tattooed on your thumb and finger tips.It would actually be my thumb and middle finger.
Oh, then you should get the letters tattooed on your knuckles. The "F" becomes dual purpose.
p.83 #15Our prayers have been answered: Nex-FF in 2 months
douglasf13 wrote: uhoh7 wroteISO1600 wroteunfortunately they are just their normal lenses with extensions on the rear so you don't need an adapter.sure, but now they will AF, without bulky sony adapter---but maybe that adapter gives better AF.I don't believe that those Samyang lenses AF at all.
p.83 #19Our prayers have been answered: Nex-FF in 2 months
So... I ordered and almost took delivery of the RX1. Still kinda wished I did take delivery.
Instead I've been shooting my GXR and manual glass rather sporadically, and much more often than not my hands are full of a D800 usually with the Sigma 35/1.4 and sometimes with a Nikkor 85/1.8.
I really like the Siggy, but bet I'd have liked the RX1 more.
As far as form factor, I must admit, I wish i could have D800 performance in a much smaller package but will I be happy with the 35/2.8? Instinctively I suspect I'd be delighted most of the time but Lightroom tells me I've shot the Siggy at f/1.4 and f/2 quite a bit, maybe not always for all the right reasons though.
My strategy of staying away from FM to keep more money in my pocket, more finger time on the shutter seems to have been spoiled by this new introduction.
p.83 #20Our prayers have been answered: Nex-FF in 2 months
So... I ordered and almost took delivery of the RX1. Still kinda wished I did take delivery.
Instead I've been shooting my GXR and manual glass rather sporadically, and much more often than not my hands are full of a D800 usually with the Sigma 35/1.4 and sometimes with a Nikkor 85/1.8.
I really like the Siggy, but bet I'd have liked the RX1 more.
As far as form factor, I must admit, I wish i could have D800 performance in a much smaller package but will I be happy with the 35/2.8? Instinctively I suspect I'd be delighted most of the time but Lightroom tells me I've shot the Siggy at f/1.4 and f/2 quite a bit, maybe not always for all the right reasons though.
My strategy of staying away from FM to keep more money in my pocket, more finger time on the shutter seems to have been spoiled by this new introduction.