Rodolfo Paiz Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
jbear2000 wrote:
Dang Rodolfo - I wish you wouldn't do that! [...] Case in point so you know what I'm talking about, you said this: "Jon hated Moose's presentation. That's OK. (The frozen props bugged me too, but the guy's specialty is bears and wildlife, so I cut him some slack.) "
Well, that's an easy one... I didn't. At least, I surely didn't intend to do it.
Thanks for pointing out a specific issue. I was just being "conversational" and referring to a previous comment in order to add a new one. So I used very loose phrasing, with "bored" and "disliked" and "disapproved of" being simplified to "hated" the presentation. I did not intend to distort your statement or change anything about it. Everyone read your comments, which were very clear. All I intended was to agree with you, then add the PW comment. If this had been a verbal conversation, I would have said "Yeah, I didn't like it that much either, but he's a wildlife guy so I'll cut him some slack. But you know what, the PW guy gets the infomercial prize, he was so much worse!" It's just a reference to a prior comment in order to segue into the next.
No offense intended, and I'm sorry if it sounded that way.
jbear2000 wrote:
Seems like Dazz may also be getting a taste of it as well.
No. Please do not extrapolate one thing to another, nor make the kind of assumptions you disapprove of others making. I made a very clear and direct comment about the B-1 night departures during our Thursday dinner, and Dazz objected to it. End of story.
|