chemprof Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
jacko wrote:
chemprof wrote:
the "lightweight", "non pro level", "consumer", D70 and D100 are not exactly flimsy, either. No argument about the viewfinder. Even my N80 has a better finder than the D70 and the D100. None compare to my Olympus OM's. Haven't tried an F5 or D1x, but the OM's were better than the F100, in my opinion, in as far as the viewfinder goes.
Gerald
Don't know how old you are Gerald (I've done bumped 50), but you sound a lot like me when it comes to viewfinders I really miss the big bright finders of the old film bodies. The finder in the D2X is much better than my D100, but it doesn't compare in brightness to the old film bodies.
My D100 had a crap load of miles on it, even though it was low in shutter actuations when I sold it, but it is an extremely durable camera. It rides the road well. Don't know about the D70, but I do know that the poly-carbonate bodies are virtually indestructable. However, there is something tangible in the 'feel' of the pro bodies that I love. For the first time, the camera truly does feel like it becomes a part of me, and not some alien object. Sure it's heavier, but man, does it feel right!
My experience with the D1X is nothing more than a road test, but after that, I would say, don't pick up a D1X unless you were serious about purchasing it It really is a fine camera. As you've said, they all make extremely good images.
Jack
Jack,
I'm 44 (next month), and have been using SLR's since I was 12 years old. My first one was a used Ricoh TLS 401 (cool camera in that it had a spot meter and an eye-level finder built in), but then I standardized on the OM system in 1980 (I still have that camera). I still think it's too bad that that "standard" was completely abandoned by Olympus. I went Nikon because of their ergonomics and because of the history of the F mount. I have not regrets, and make due with my finders (until I pick up one of my OM's!).
Gerald
|