Home · Register · Search · View Winners · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Photo Critique | Join Upload & Sell

1
       2       end
  

Archive 2012 · From yesterday morning
  
 
ben egbert
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #1 · From yesterday morning


While I was shooting sunrises at Utah Lake. I swung my camera around for this shot. I just wanted to see what others thought about it. I don't know what to think.




  Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III    EF24-70mm f/2.8L II USM lens    35mm    f/6.3    1/13s    100 ISO    0.0 EV  




Nov 29, 2012 at 11:19 PM
sadja
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · From yesterday morning


I don't what to think either. There's not much point to the image.


Nov 30, 2012 at 12:11 AM
Camperjim
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · From yesterday morning


I think I would prefer a lot less of the rocks. I know you like to keep a standard aspect ratio but I think I would crop off some of the bottom of the image. It does seem like your early morning outing was worth the effort.


Nov 30, 2012 at 01:58 AM
ben egbert
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · From yesterday morning


Hi Jim, I don't understand the type which I have seen before so I am open to all suggestions. The only reason I posted this is because it looks to me like it has leading lines. That was an accident on my part, but when I saw it, I wanted to get some insight from people who understand the type.

I got some really great color later and in another direction. So this was one more of an experiment.



Nov 30, 2012 at 02:03 AM
Camperjim
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #5 · From yesterday morning


There are "leading" lines but they don't lead anywhere of interest as far as I can see.

Anyway I thought this would be better with fewer rocks and sjadja wants an image with a point. That should not be difficult.







Nov 30, 2012 at 02:13 AM
ben egbert
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #6 · From yesterday morning


Ha ha. Good point.




Nov 30, 2012 at 02:14 AM
RustyBug
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #7 · From yesterday morning


Took a stab ...







Nov 30, 2012 at 03:35 AM
ben egbert
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #8 · From yesterday morning


Thanks Kent. And I probably owe the forum an apology. I should never post an image in which I have no personal connection. This was a fishing expedition, but I knew in advance that there was nothing here.

I am still working out the what to post and where thing. This forum has been very helpful in helping me refine what I take and in post processing. I still want to post problem images here.

It seems that a purely experimental image might be ok or one that has promise when fixed. But not one in which I really have no interest.



Nov 30, 2012 at 03:38 PM
RustyBug
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #9 · From yesterday morning


No apologies needed ... it's all fair game.

Sometimes a posted image gives us something to "ooh & ahh" over, other times it presents something for critical analysis, tips & techniques, or simply expand our consideration of something not previously given credence to. and yet other times it is an opportunity to make lemonade from lemons and have a little fun.

Nobody shoots 100% winners ... same goes for posts. While some flourish (posts or pics), others die on the vine ... but we still keep striving to be better sowers, that we can become better reapers. Let the sowing continue such that the harvest abound.

The consideration for the forum is noted & appreciated ... but imo, it's all fair game, no worries.

Edited on Nov 30, 2012 at 03:58 PM · View previous versions



Nov 30, 2012 at 03:50 PM
Camperjim
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #10 · From yesterday morning


Please don't apologize for posting an image which is not great but raises issues for discussion. I have plenty of these I want to post. In fact I may not have much except for problem images.


Nov 30, 2012 at 03:54 PM
 

Search in Used Dept. 



RustyBug
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #11 · From yesterday morning


Camperjim wrote:
In fact I may not have much except for problem images.


Isn't every image a problem of one sort or another? I know mine all are.



Nov 30, 2012 at 04:00 PM
ben egbert
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #12 · From yesterday morning


If I want ohhs and ahs, this is the wrong forum, this is specifically a critique forum not for presentation. If I center an image on purpose, this is the wrong forum.

If I take a "me too" image just for something to do, this may be ok but it also has little value to me.

Any image can be changed and any change may have its detractors and admirers. But if you have a good capture of a good scene and have presented it the way you want, critique ends up being about post processing tricks or cropping suggestions not about the image itself.

It seems to me I ought to stay in my style niche, and present the ones I am happy with at Landscape and the worthy ones that need more help here.

But this is probably also a good place for the experimental stuff like moonlight shots where I am developing a technique.

If I am off base here, please let me know.







Nov 30, 2012 at 05:05 PM
RustyBug
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #13 · From yesterday morning


We don't mind a little "oooh & ahhh" eye candy along the way.

Granted your perspective @ the PC forum's technical intent is likely spot on ... but we can let our hair down a bit for some eye candy too, I think. Don't hold out on us too much.



Nov 30, 2012 at 06:22 PM
rotorwash4944
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #14 · From yesterday morning


I don't think this requires an apology at all... in fact, I believe it is great example of how we mere mortals begin developing a good thought process when choosing what to frame. No question it was a beautiful morning, so the first thing we all do is instinctively reach for the camera. Although wonderfully composed, with pretty colors, the simple question of "what's the point" instantly forces one to up their game and teaches an important lesson. Thank you for such a prime example


Nov 30, 2012 at 06:59 PM
Camperjim
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #15 · From yesterday morning


Ben wrote: "But if you have a good capture of a good scene and have presented it the way you want, critique ends up being about post processing tricks or cropping suggestions not about the image itself."

I am not sure I would agree. I was just trying to process some images I took at Death Valley before, during and after a violent storm. I have plenty of captures with proper exposure and proper focus so I guess they are "good". They don't come close to representing what I saw. I seem to find that sort of thing happens often. The ooc image just doesn't work and needs some processing to even come close to recreating what I saw.




Nov 30, 2012 at 07:36 PM
ben egbert
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #16 · From yesterday morning


Camperjim wrote:
Ben wrote: "But if you have a good capture of a good scene and have presented it the way you want, critique ends up being about post processing tricks or cropping suggestions not about the image itself."

I am not sure I would agree. I was just trying to process some images I took at Death Valley before, during and after a violent storm. I have plenty of captures with proper exposure and proper focus so I guess they are "good". They don't come close to representing what I saw. I seem to find that sort of thing happens often. The
...Show more

Well that would mean it does not meet my "presented the way I want" criteria and falls into the other category of a worthy image that needs help. That's what I think I am going to do. My "need some color help" was a good example.

The image that started this thread is just a "me too" thing. The big problem is that I think it is like other images I have seen but don't really understand at even a basic level so it is only a "me too" in my mind and others can't even see what it is attempting to copy.

I don't have much of a clue what people want to do with non-centered, or leading lines or read left to right or subject pointer etc. These are sort of like many grammar rules which I have sort of memorized (but often mess up) and consider totally worthless and illogical.




Nov 30, 2012 at 07:45 PM
RustyBug
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #17 · From yesterday morning


I ain't so sure I don't reckon I understan' by what you means you is messin' up grammy's rulers. D'ey seemed to work jus' fine back when she was tannin' my hide wit 'em ... I membered dem rulers real good two, but I doesn't recall ever messin' 'em up.

Rules ... we don't need no stinkin' rules.

Edited on Nov 30, 2012 at 11:02 PM · View previous versions



Nov 30, 2012 at 10:26 PM
ben egbert
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #18 · From yesterday morning


Hey, maks sens to me


Nov 30, 2012 at 10:38 PM
Mister Bean
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #19 · From yesterday morning


ben egbert wrote:
If I want ohhs and ahs, this is the wrong forum, this is specifically a critique forum not for presentation. If I center an image on purpose, this is the wrong forum.

If I take a "me too" image just for something to do, this may be ok but it also has little value to me.

Any image can be changed and any change may have its detractors and admirers. But if you have a good capture of a good scene and have presented it the way you want, critique ends up being about post processing tricks or cropping suggestions
...Show more

Critique on this forum is quite a bit different from my experience with it in school and in art groups. While I mostly do photography now, I've taken a fair number of art classes for drawing, painting and sculpture and have participated in art groups for the same. In those, critique was a process more similar to what's described on this page: [url]http://www.wikihow.com/Critique-Artwork[/url] So discussion of the technical elements of the piece was certainly a part of the critique, but what typically took more time was discussion of the interpretation of the work - the viewer's interpretation of the artist's intent, the artist describing their intent, the feelings evoked, symbols in the work, the value of the work, etc. Critique here does often become just a series of reworks rather than a real discussion of the work itself.

A couple reasons for this come to mind. The first is that this has become the forum on the site that people bring unfinished pieces to. In my experience, one would typically bring a finished piece to a critique. The other is that a more in depth critique is hard. It takes real thought, particularly when you're not familiar with the process. It's much easier to post a rework.

I sometimes find this somewhat disappointing. Seeing the various types of processing can be interesting. But it doesn't have the same value as a deeper discussion of the piece. There's a little of this in the other forums, but stil not much.

I would just post where you want to and explain whether you're looking for help, or otherwise.



Dec 02, 2012 at 09:50 AM
RustyBug
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #20 · From yesterday morning


Mister Bean wrote:

what typically took more time was discussion of the interpretation of the work - the viewer's interpretation of the artist's intent, the artist describing their intent, the feelings evoked, symbols in the work, the value of the work, etc.

A couple reasons for this come to mind.



"What's the point?" or "What is the message that you want to convey to your viewer?"


While I have advocated those questions to OP's for quite some time ... I think that some of the images that are presented here, the OP themselves haven't even begun to embark on the mindful aspects of their own "artist's intent". When the creator of the image doesn't know his intent ... it's kinda hard to discuss the deeper philosophical aspects of the message contained therein.

There will always be both parts of technical & message ... with, imo, technicals & reworks should be driven by the intent of the image / message. For many, they simply want to be able to produce an aesthetically pleasing image to garner "Look what I did." response. Images that are being created with an intended message are somewhat more rare in regard to "Here's what I'm trying to say." or "Here are some things to think about."

I am inclined to believe that as technology has prolifically expanded the ease of our craft, many have become "lazy" in their aspirations to use it as means for conveying a message and largely have abandoned it as such, simply aspiring to use it to either emulate others or garner the "ooh & ahh" ... prior to utilizing images as a means for message delivery.

Taking that same concept into a different art form, today's quilters make amazingly detailed "pretty quilts" ... whereas there was a time that quilts were a very strong combination of "art" and "message" ... often telling the message of family, heritage, history, emotion & feeling. I think that the blending of art and message is well represented in the quilts that were made to provide directions in concert with the "underground railroad" or as families made "double wedding ring" quilts as wedding gifts for bride & groom. Very different messages, interwoven into the craft, yet there was still a point / message instilled among its creation.

Whether it be quilts, photographs or any other art form ... without a point or message, it often times just falls into the category of something pretty ... and for the masses, that's often what they are looking for ... others aspire for more.




Edited on Dec 02, 2012 at 03:43 PM · View previous versions



Dec 02, 2012 at 03:29 PM
1
       2       end




FM Forums | Photo Critique | Join Upload & Sell

1
       2       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password    Retrive password