Ken Hill wrote:
So today I am at Marshall's Camera and a guy walks in! Looks familiar and asks to see a Df that they have. Nice Camera low picture count and in silver.
Well every picture tells a story!
But …. that guy does look familiar !
Coulda saved a lot and just bought an adapter for his Fuji like any normal person
Interesting carved figures inside temples. You can clearly see where visitors have touched the figures, their skin oils darkening the spots, presumably for luck or I'm not sure.
kwoodard wrote:
Methinks you need to go do a rescue mission and start playing. I like Aurther Morgan a tad more than Marsden.
Oh man, I really liked Marsden, Ive been staying away from even watching Rick play just because I dont want to ruin any game play, will have to get to playing soon.
Also another temple but umm in Japan
Kannonji at Ofuna; kannon being the Japanese version of the bodhisattva/ goddess of mercy
We see it everyday on our way out from 'home'
It's right outside the train station from our connecting monorail
Contemplated shooting without the lines but shrug
I would call it 9+
$85 shipped and Paypal'd
Will put it on the B/S board this weekend
Need to sell to replace part of the money Scott has been squeezing me for
I would call it 9+
$85 shipped and Paypal'd
Will put it on the B/S board this weekend
Need to sell to replace part of the money Scott has been squeezing me for
Reagan
Also an RRS L-bracket for D750
Hi Reagan
I was/am looking for telephoto lenses for my new mirrorless and 80-200 f4/f4.5 is something I researched. Is the 200/4 AI-S better (and smaller) lens that 80-200?
Edit: if you have experience with both of them.
I have both and the 200 F4 and the 80-200 AiS F4. Re the 80-200, you will only want the square cut out on the rear element. This is the last version. The 200mm is sweet and 3/4 the size and weight of the 80-200. Both use 52mm filters.
Thanks, both.
I was also suggested to look at series e 75-150 since size and weight are also a concern for me - I recently put Nikon 105mm VR Micro on Sony A6000 and that combination is a terrible, terrible idea.
Also, regarding 80-200, is 4.5 version with rectangular baffle at the end considered sharper than f4?
