James Markus wrote:
Had a couple minutes before dinner. Wanted the Nikkor-S 5.8cm f1.4 non-ai and I pressed the 7DmkII into camera duty. It roughly is 93mm EFL on this 1.6x crop body. I expected to lose some of the dreamy bokeh, but it held up well. All are wide open at f1.4
Funny story here. I named this "Convergence". My sweetie asked why, so I pointed out how the road edges and the overhead wires and the beams of the bridge side barriers all converged to a spot on the horizon. I explained that it was a composition technique that was supposed to make the viewers' eyes move that way. She said her eyes moved to the bike. So much for that bit of orthodoxy! Of course in this pic the bike is the one detail that breaks up the simplicity of the scenery. ...Show more →
---------------------------------------------
jimmuller wrote:
A few days ago I picked up a developed roll of Kodacolor 200 I started using at least two months ago. They were taken with the Nikkormat FTn but I couldn't tell you which lens each was shot with.
jimmuller wrote:
My sweetie wanted to go to a local organic farm stand. Since we were in the neighborhood we also went for a walk through Brewster's Woods. I took the 200mm f/4 Q Auto. I've owned it for over 50 years. It's still one of my favorites. Not quite the super-tele for some bird shots but oh so sharp and oh so convenient.
Michel's (lumenspixel) question got me thinking about those lofty super high resolution sensors of the future. It was then I realized that I did have an even higher pixel density sensor than the 5DS-R - the 1.6 crop 90D has almost 25% smaller photo sites (pixel pitch of 4.14μm for the 5DS-R versus 3.23μm for the 90D), and manages to cram 32.5 megapixels into it's crop sensor. What would happen? Would it be too much for my 1960 used Nikkor? The anticipation was, meh, non-existant.
Some left over 7DmkII from yesterday
I thought I had got rid of those Trumpet vines - nope
James Markus wrote:
Michel's (lumenspixel) question got me thinking about those lofty super high resolution sensors of the future. It was then I realized that I did have an even higher pixel density sensor than the 5DS-R - the 1.6 crop 90D has almost 25% smaller photo sites (pixel pitch of 4.14μm for the 5DS-R versus 3.23μm for the 90D), and manages to cram 32.5 megapixels into it's crop sensor. What would happen? Would it be too much for my 1960 used Nikkor? The anticipation was, meh, non-existant.
James Markus wrote:
The grain is really good. Have you tried pushing it beyond the 100 iso?
I am not sure how well x-ray film responds to pushing, and no data are available (that I could find) for anything beyond box speed. This film has no antihalation layer and in brighter conditions there can be very extreme halation, especially in the 35mm version (I've mostly shot it in 120, where the halation effect is less pronounced for some reason even though it's exactly the same film).
Just got an AI-S 28/3.5 from the B&S board here and went out last night to test it.
All shot between f/5.6 and f/8 with ISO 25600 to 51200 on my Z6II + the 28/3.5 AI-S with all the in-camera corrections off and NR/VR off. It beats the Z 28/2.8 in every way.
All shot between f/5.6 and f/8 with ISO 25600 to 51200 on my Z6II + the 28/3.5 AI-S with all the in-camera corrections off and NR/VR off. It beats the Z 28/2.8 in every way.
I am ignorant about the Z but I can tell the 28 3,5 last computation is a very good mid distance to landscape lens. It can be nice on close ups but only in the central part of the image.