Scott - that's a wonderful image, I can feel myself settling into autumn.
George - I don't know how you're managing to get any output on an iPad Air without a pen. Congratulations. I've tried on an iPad Pro with a pen and it's way too much work. I could manage simple adjustments but I didn't really enjoy it.
Sammy - you've photographed that building a lot. You and I have very different concepts of a "light" camera for walking around. That thing is a beast. I take my hat off to you sir.
Ben
This is a very light camera, should be somewhat amenable to walks with it.
Here I am buying a smaller/lighter camera because I don't want to walk around with all the weight, and here you are hauling around one that's 10 times the size and weight. You are the man!
bruni wrote:
Scott - that's a wonderful image, I can feel myself settling into autumn.
George - I don't know how you're managing to get any output on an iPad Air without a pen. Congratulations. I've tried on an iPad Pro with a pen and it's way too much work. I could manage simple adjustments but I didn't really enjoy it.
Sammy - you've photographed that building a lot. You and I have very different concepts of a "light" camera for walking around. That thing is a beast. I take my hat off to you sir.
Ben
The videos I've watched with people using a pen on the ipad make it look so easy.
Saph,
Thanks for the encouraging report on the 500 f/4 P. I’ll be testing a potential seller’s lens on Tuesday and I am eager to see the results. I liked your very good sample images.
Best,
Kevin
DocMurdock wrote:
Saph,
Thanks for the encouraging report on the 500 f/4 P. I’ll be testing a potential seller’s lens on Tuesday and I am eager to see the results. I liked your very good sample images.
Best,
Kevin
When you get it, come back and share your images and join in on the conversation.
leighton w wrote:
Good to see you again, nice images.
Thanks.
I do not use my AI 50/1.4 much often ... I use 24-70/4 Z usually.
However, on this week-end I've decided to use 14-30/4 Z and AI 50/1.4 to save weight and room in the bag.
serge07 wrote:
Riccardo, nice photos from Rome.
Thank you Serge! Love your pictures and the AI 16/3.5!
Ripolini wrote:
Thanks.
I do not use my AI 50/1.4 much often ... I use 24-70/4 Z usually.
However, on this week-end I've decided to use 14-30/4 Z and AI 50/1.4 to save weight and room in the bag.
Thank you Serge! Love your pictures and the AI 16/3.5!
Riccardo, thanks and glad you enjoyed the photos. The 16/3.5 is a cracker of a lens and lots of fun to use.
Take care,
Serge
bruni wrote:
Jay - really loving those PCE shots, it's amazing what a difference it makes. I've been taking pics with the 18mm and I can't look at them anymore after looking at your shots.
And I'm so happy you know Blow Up, finally someone knows what I'm talking about. When I first brought it up all those years ago no-one knew what I was talking about, no-one even seemed to have heard of Antonioni. That is such an influential film. I think you can trace the whole hipster movement to that film. And the blow up sequence itself has now become a staple of just about all police and detective dramas, everyone's blowing up images to read licence plates, or security cams to identify offenders but Antonioni was the first. As for the minimal focussing distance, yeah, well that wasn't the only piece of artistic licence he took.
Steve - are you sure you awaited the results of the tanking process? I notice the sky has gone purple in that shot.
DeltaSigma wrote:
I never get tired of those Oculus photos.
Amazing architecture that I'd like to see for myself one day.
Colin it s an amazing architectural design and engineering marvel. There is a complex network of trains below which was entirely rebuilt, much of it below sea level.
You would have a blast with the camera.
Cheers,
Serge
Colin - that's a freaky effect. Although I'm not sure I'd call that a house. It looks like there's an east wing and a west wing, it's almost baronial. I'm starting to marvel that you have any time for photography with a garden like that to maintain.
