Ken Hill wrote:
Raphael you’ve surely “nailed” 🔨 it !!
Thank you Ken, here is another nail, she came back home today from several weeks of very successful testing.
Light was harsh, hitting the front of the 85mm 1.4, but the lens handled this well, the camera could not deal with the dynamic range of the sunset reflection from her hull.
Laura, fantastic to see you posting photos of classic speedy flying objects. I missed them.
Rafael, congrats on receiving an 85/1.4 that meets your expectations. It looks pristine! That is one lens that has always had my interest.
The folks at Central Park do this annually and it feels like spring meeting fall. It was very crowded last Saturday and had to wait a long spell for the crowds to briefly clear.
Checking out the close up capability of the 28/2.8.
This is the most southerly of the islands around HK and takes around 40 mins to get there on a ferry. Only one ferry there and back a day four days a week. We went on a Thursday, and if you miss the ferry back you are sleeping under the stars there until Saturday when the next one comes I think there's only 100 people living there now and are mostly fisherpeople. It's a nice peaceful place and pretty popular for camping.
I took the F3HP with Portra 400 @ 320 & 24/2.8 N.C. + 35/2 O + 50/1.4 S.C + 85/1.8 H.C. I metered for the green which was usually around 1/500 and used a 2-stop GND for the sky in some cases. I think there was around 3 stops difference between the sky and the mountains but this is no big deal for negative film.
The file says 7R4.xxxx
So it was #4 good thing I keep track
Wasn't that a beautiful sunset
Too bad I won't have a Nikon next week
but I am working on it
R
mp356 wrote:
Nice images Reagan. Was this from the first, second, or third D700?
