genji wrote: RustyBug wrotehelimat wroteIt is an underrated lens in my opinion! There is a boxed 2.5 version for $800 on the B&S, seems like a fantastic deal to me, and I am surprised no one has grabbed it yet. There is of course some confusion as to whether or not it is truly a different optical design from the 2.4 version... All's I know for sure is the that MFD is shorter on the 2.4 version, but I suppose that in itself could just be a change to the helicoid. airfrogusmc wroteI had the 2.5 75 Summarit and it is a real gem. It shouldn't last long at 800.Just trying to push me over the edge ... aren't ya.
I've been pondering this one, and watching your pics to gauge if I want to switch out from the Voigt.
75/1.5 Voigt in the bag now
2.5 = bang / buck
2.4 = closer MFD
2.0 = APOAPO.
I intended to sell the 2.5 and the CV 1.5 to fund the APO. I bought the APO, sold the 2.5, and held onto the 1.5 even though I hate its haptics. I love the APO but, honestly, either the 2.4 or the 2.5 would complement the 1.5 nicely.
As much as I covet both the 75 and 90 APO, there is certainly a penalty in the form of size, weight, and of course price. I like how compact the Summarit is, takes very little space in the bag. But who am I kidding... I'll probably end up with an APO at some point!
I too had the VM 75/1.5, and although I found the IQ to be fantastic, I was not a fan of the size and haptics. And 58mm filters....? Although I did like that due to the design of the aperture ring, I could easily extrapolate what f/stop I was at while looking through the rangefinder!
In the meantime, I recently went even further as far as size & weight, and picked up a 90/4 Macro-Elmar that came up locally for a pretty good price. Again, very little space in the bag.