The Tele-Elmar 135/4 wasn't quite up to the job here, with the failing light forcing the ISO to 12500 in order to maintain a reasonable shutter speed. But this morning I remembered I have a Canon 100/2 LTM which is remarkably sharp wide open for a sixty year old lens so I'll try that next.
Didn't expect to find my recently acquired Leica IIIc to be so enjoyable - I love its compactness and simplicity. I find the rangefinder focusing very accurate (after CLA of my 1947-built camera). The IIIc has a yellowish spot in the rangefinder path which makes it easier to align the two images - sort of similar what nowadays focus peaking does in mirrorless cameras - just that this was developed > 70 years ago! My M cameras don't have this spot-like rangefinder focusing anymore - not really needed either but a nice thing to have in the much smaller rangefinder focusing window of the IIIc.
Some shots taken with the IIIc and 50/2.0 Summitar (made in 1942 and came without any scratch!) plus CV 25/4.0 LTM lenses. Ilfords FP4+ 125 film developed in Xtol (1:1).
Rob L wrote:
The M3s had the yellow spot and if I remember right, a slight blue tint to the rest of the viewfinder. M2s and later did not have this.
I have a M3 from 1957, and it does not have the yellow spot, but the viewfinder has a blueish cast. Maybe the yellow spot existed only in early M3s? There is not much written about this yellow spot anywhere in general.
The results from the Canon 100/2 LTM are quite an improvement over those from the Tele-Elmar 135/4. It's rather awkward to use however--being such an old design that it doesn't have a double helicoid. Consequently, when one focuses, the aperture ring rotates with the outer lens barrel. Moreover, the focus throw is extremely long: ~315˚ of rotation from 1 meter to infinity.
I finally made it to Photoville in Brooklyn yesterday, which was the last day, but I was actually kind of underwhelmed by it this year, so I just snapped some shots in the park area.
AcuteShadows wrote: joakim wroteAcuteShadows wroteAt Hudson Yards, New York.Just wanted to point out that this is an image thread for Leica cameras.Is there a dedicated separate thread for Leica lenses?
There’s a dedicated thread for Leica R Series Lenses. You might want to start one for M lenses (or M/L/S lenses). Lots of members are using those lenses on Sony, Nikon, and Panasonic mirrorless bodies (not sure about Canon).
AcuteShadows wrote: genji wroteAcuteShadows wrotejoakim wroteAcuteShadows wroteAt Hudson Yards, New York.Just wanted to point out that this is an image thread for Leica cameras.Is there a dedicated separate thread for Leica lenses?There’s a dedicated thread for Leica R Series Lenses. You might want to start one for M lenses (or M/L/S lenses). Lots of members are using those lenses on Sony, Nikon, and Panasonic mirrorless bodies (not sure about Canon).I think that 80% of the technical aspects of a photo are determined by the lens. So I regard a system consisting of X lenses with a Y camera as an X system (at least for manual focus, things may be different for AF sports, where the camera has more impact).
For some Leica lenses (new Summicron 28mm, Summarit 50, 90, APO-Summicron 50mm), the Nikon Z delivers about 95% of Leica image quality, which cannot be said for all Leica lens / third party camera combinations. But who would want a dedicated thread for subpar camera/lens combinations?
A separate thread would compete with the existing thread for space on the top thread listing, while offering almost the same content. So I do not think such a thread would actually be a useful addition to the forum....Show more →
This dedicated Leica thread has been active for over 9 years now and while the Leica universe has grown beyond being mostly rangefinder cameras I think it still holds a value to have a thread dedicated to Leica cameras only even if there are rational arguments against it .
AcuteShadows wrote: genji wroteAcuteShadows wrotejoakim wroteAcuteShadows wroteAt Hudson Yards, New York.Just wanted to point out that this is an image thread for Leica cameras.Is there a dedicated separate thread for Leica lenses?There’s a dedicated thread for Leica R Series Lenses. You might want to start one for M lenses (or M/L/S lenses). Lots of members are using those lenses on Sony, Nikon, and Panasonic mirrorless bodies (not sure about Canon).I think that 80% of the technical aspects of a photo are determined by the lens. So I regard a system consisting of X lenses with a Y camera as an X system (at least for manual focus, things may be different for AF sports, where the camera has more impact).
For some Leica lenses (new Summicron 28mm, Summarit 50, 90, APO-Summicron 50mm), the Nikon Z delivers about 95% of Leica image quality, which cannot be said for all Leica lens / third party camera combinations. But who would want a dedicated thread for subpar camera/lens combinations?
A separate thread would compete with the existing thread for space on the top thread listing, while offering almost the same content. So I do not think such a thread would actually be a useful addition to the forum....Show more →