fredmiranda.com Login

Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread

  
 
genji
Offline
Details
p.1674 #2Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
The Tele-Elmar 135/4 wasn't quite up to the job here, with the failing light forcing the ISO to 12500 in order to maintain a reasonable shutter speed. But this morning I remembered I have a Canon 100/2 LTM which is remarkably sharp wide open for a sixty year old lens so I'll try that next.









Sep 21, 2019 at 12:23 AM
airfrogusmc
Offline
Details
p.1674 #3Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Gary Clennan wrote:
airfrogusmc wrotehttps://pbase.com/airfrogusmc/image/169792580.jpg

https://pbase.com/airfrogusmc/image/169792583.jpg

https://pbase.com/airfrogusmc/image/169792581.jpg

https://pbase.com/airfrogusmc/image/169792579.jpg

https://pbase.com/airfrogusmc/image/169792582.jpg
I really like the first one here Allen!


Thanks!

Sep 21, 2019 at 05:35 AM
retrofocus
Offline
Details
p.1674 #4Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Didn't expect to find my recently acquired Leica IIIc to be so enjoyable - I love its compactness and simplicity. I find the rangefinder focusing very accurate (after CLA of my 1947-built camera). The IIIc has a yellowish spot in the rangefinder path which makes it easier to align the two images - sort of similar what nowadays focus peaking does in mirrorless cameras - just that this was developed > 70 years ago! My M cameras don't have this spot-like rangefinder focusing anymore - not really needed either but a nice thing to have in the much smaller rangefinder focusing window of the IIIc.

Some shots taken with the IIIc and 50/2.0 Summitar (made in 1942 and came without any scratch!) plus CV 25/4.0 LTM lenses. Ilfords FP4+ 125 film developed in Xtol (1:1).













Sep 21, 2019 at 07:49 PM
Rob L
Offline
Details
p.1674 #5Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
The M3s had the yellow spot and if I remember right, a slight blue tint to the rest of the viewfinder. M2s and later did not have this.
Sep 22, 2019 at 08:33 AM
airfrogusmc
Offline
Details
p.1674 #6Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
The band Rico and Ricky Baker.








Sep 22, 2019 at 09:12 AM
retrofocus
Offline
Details
p.1674 #7Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Rob L wrote:
The M3s had the yellow spot and if I remember right, a slight blue tint to the rest of the viewfinder. M2s and later did not have this.


I have a M3 from 1957, and it does not have the yellow spot, but the viewfinder has a blueish cast. Maybe the yellow spot existed only in early M3s? There is not much written about this yellow spot anywhere in general.
Sep 22, 2019 at 09:14 AM
genji
Offline
Details
p.1674 #8Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
The results from the Canon 100/2 LTM are quite an improvement over those from the Tele-Elmar 135/4. It's rather awkward to use however--being such an old design that it doesn't have a double helicoid. Consequently, when one focuses, the aperture ring rotates with the outer lens barrel. Moreover, the focus throw is extremely long: ~315˚ of rotation from 1 meter to infinity.
















Edited on Sep 23, 2019 at 06:41 AM · View previous versions
Sep 23, 2019 at 04:51 AM
RickPerry
Offline
Details
p.1674 #9Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Here's a few 'Postcards' from Maine - Pemaquid Light.

TL2 - Leica 18-56



















Sep 23, 2019 at 04:58 AM
AcuteShadows
Offline
Details
p.1674 #10Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Deleted.

Edited on Sep 28, 2019 at 01:59 PM · View previous versions
Sep 23, 2019 at 06:38 AM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

myam203
Offline
Details
p.1674 #11Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
I finally made it to Photoville in Brooklyn yesterday, which was the last day, but I was actually kind of underwhelmed by it this year, so I just snapped some shots in the park area.
























Sep 23, 2019 at 09:30 AM
joakim
Offline
Details
p.1674 #12Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
AcuteShadows wrote:
At Hudson Yards, New York.


Just wanted to point out that this is an image thread for Leica cameras.
Sep 23, 2019 at 02:31 PM
joakim
Offline
Details
p.1674 #13Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Monochrom-246 and .95 Noctilux




Sep 23, 2019 at 02:32 PM
AcuteShadows
Offline
Details
p.1674 #14Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Deleted.

Edited on Sep 28, 2019 at 02:00 PM · View previous versions
Sep 23, 2019 at 03:01 PM
airfrogusmc
Offline
Details
p.1674 #15Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
No not that I know of.

Sep 23, 2019 at 03:27 PM
genji
Offline
Details
p.1674 #16Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
AcuteShadows wrote:
joakim wrote
AcuteShadows wroteAt Hudson Yards, New York.
Just wanted to point out that this is an image thread for Leica cameras.
Is there a dedicated separate thread for Leica lenses?


There’s a dedicated thread for Leica R Series Lenses. You might want to start one for M lenses (or M/L/S lenses). Lots of members are using those lenses on Sony, Nikon, and Panasonic mirrorless bodies (not sure about Canon).
Sep 23, 2019 at 05:26 PM
AcuteShadows
Offline
Details
p.1674 #17Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Deleted.

Edited on Sep 28, 2019 at 02:00 PM · View previous versions
Sep 23, 2019 at 06:08 PM
mapgraphs
Offline
Details
p.1674 #18Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
An M/LTM thread might be attractive. I use M, ZM, VM and LTM across camera brands (Leica, Nikon, Sony) without hesitation.
Sep 23, 2019 at 09:29 PM
joakim
Offline
Details
p.1674 #19Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
AcuteShadows wrote:
genji wrote
AcuteShadows wrote
joakim wrote
AcuteShadows wroteAt Hudson Yards, New York.
Just wanted to point out that this is an image thread for Leica cameras.
Is there a dedicated separate thread for Leica lenses?
There’s a dedicated thread for Leica R Series Lenses. You might want to start one for M lenses (or M/L/S lenses). Lots of members are using those lenses on Sony, Nikon, and Panasonic mirrorless bodies (not sure about Canon).
I think that 80% of the technical aspects of a photo are determined by the lens. So I regard a system consisting of X lenses with a Y camera as an X system (at least for manual focus, things may be different for AF sports, where the camera has more impact).

For some Leica lenses (new Summicron 28mm, Summarit 50, 90, APO-Summicron 50mm), the Nikon Z delivers about 95% of Leica image quality, which cannot be said for all Leica lens / third party camera combinations. But who would want a dedicated thread for subpar camera/lens combinations?

A separate thread would
...Show more →

This dedicated Leica thread has been active for over 9 years now and while the Leica universe has grown beyond being mostly rangefinder cameras I think it still holds a value to have a thread dedicated to Leica cameras only even if there are rational arguments against it .
Sep 24, 2019 at 12:31 AM
airfrogusmc
Offline
Details
p.1674 #20Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
AcuteShadows wrote:
genji wrote
AcuteShadows wrote
joakim wrote
AcuteShadows wroteAt Hudson Yards, New York.
Just wanted to point out that this is an image thread for Leica cameras.
Is there a dedicated separate thread for Leica lenses?
There’s a dedicated thread for Leica R Series Lenses. You might want to start one for M lenses (or M/L/S lenses). Lots of members are using those lenses on Sony, Nikon, and Panasonic mirrorless bodies (not sure about Canon).
I think that 80% of the technical aspects of a photo are determined by the lens. So I regard a system consisting of X lenses with a Y camera as an X system (at least for manual focus, things may be different for AF sports, where the camera has more impact).

For some Leica lenses (new Summicron 28mm, Summarit 50, 90, APO-Summicron 50mm), the Nikon Z delivers about 95% of Leica image quality, which cannot be said for all Leica lens / third party camera combinations. But who would want a dedicated thread for subpar camera/lens combinations?

A separate thread would
...Show more →

Or you can just pick up an M 10.

Sep 24, 2019 at 09:46 AM


FM ForumsLeica & Alternative GearJoin Upload & Sell
  
 

You are not logged inLog inRegister