Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
p.1484 #1Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
joakim wrote:
What is that statue? I've never seen it before or heard of it.
It's part of an art installation on Tjörn. http://pilane.org/
What is that statue? I've never seen it before or heard of it.
It's part of an art installation on Tjörn. http://pilane.org/
Jul 31, 2017 at 01:13 AM
p.1484 #2Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
The Towel I by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
Monochrom, Noctilux 1/1.0
Great shots, Nicola. Finally a very wellknown place in BW !
Jul 31, 2017 at 01:16 AM
p.1484 #4Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
xwing15 wrote:
@ Mitch
Thank you very much for the very great feedback. think its definitely better
Yes, more effective. But, tell me, how did you get her to come back and pose for the second picture?
@ Mitch
Thank you very much for the very great feedback. think its definitely better
Yes, more effective. But, tell me, how did you get her to come back and pose for the second picture?
Jul 31, 2017 at 04:57 AM
p.1484 #5Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Mitch Alland wrote:
Thank you very much for the very great feedback. think its definitely betterYes, more effective. But, tell me, how did you get her to come back and pose for the second picture?
That remains my secret Mitch
xwing15 wrote
@ MitchThank you very much for the very great feedback. think its definitely better
That remains my secret Mitch
Jul 31, 2017 at 05:49 AM
p.1484 #6Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Ridge Light
M246 + 75cron x 2 images
M246 + 75cron x 2 images
 |
||
 |
||
|
Jul 31, 2017 at 09:03 AM
leonasj
Offline
Activity
[X]
Details
p.1484 #7Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
jpeg,from fishing,not perfect focus at 70cm
SL/summilux m50/1.4asph at 1.4
Edited on Aug 01, 2017 at 02:29 PM · View previous versions
SL/summilux m50/1.4asph at 1.4
Edited on Aug 01, 2017 at 02:29 PM · View previous versions
Jul 31, 2017 at 09:30 AM
p.1484 #8Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Bistrot II by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
Monochrom, Summicron M 90/2.0
Jul 31, 2017 at 11:02 AM
leonasj
Offline
Activity
[X]
Details
p.1484 #9Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
jpeg,iso1250
SL/TL 60AA
© leonasj 2017
SL/TL 60AA
Aug 01, 2017 at 01:30 AM
p.1484 #10Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
I'm not so "into" lenses like some people are, but I thought these really showed the qualities of the CV 35/1.4 SC in a particularly flattering way.
p.s. anyone else not seeing these? Has FM changed the way it shares photos? I used to be able to just drop the . jpeg URL...
p.s. anyone else not seeing these? Has FM changed the way it shares photos? I used to be able to just drop the . jpeg URL...
Aug 01, 2017 at 09:01 AM
|
p.1484 #11Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
ricardovaste wrote:
I'm not so "into" lenses like some people are, but I thought these really showed the qualities of the CV 35/1.4 SC in a particularly flattering way.
p.s. anyone else not seeing these? Has FM changed the way it shares photos? I used to be able to just drop the . jpeg URL...
I don't see them here but when I copied the url into a new window then I could see the image. The third one was my favourite
I'm not so "into" lenses like some people are, but I thought these really showed the qualities of the CV 35/1.4 SC in a particularly flattering way.
p.s. anyone else not seeing these? Has FM changed the way it shares photos? I used to be able to just drop the . jpeg URL...
I don't see them here but when I copied the url into a new window then I could see the image. The third one was my favourite
Aug 01, 2017 at 10:35 AM
p.1484 #12Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
MM-246 with 35 Summilux FLE and an IR filter (092).
Aug 01, 2017 at 11:40 AM
p.1484 #13Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Ricardo, i don't see any of your pics ....
Aug 01, 2017 at 12:05 PM
p.1484 #14Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Same for me Ricardo - nothing visible
Nice IR photos Joakim, I didn't realise that the M246 had an IR capability.
Nice IR photos Joakim, I didn't realise that the M246 had an IR capability.
Aug 02, 2017 at 12:50 AM
p.1484 #15Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
lenticular11 wrote:
...
Nice IR photos Joakim, I didn't realise that the M246 had an IR capability.
To some extent it has, I was expired by this article by David English on the Leica blog.
...
Nice IR photos Joakim, I didn't realise that the M246 had an IR capability.
To some extent it has, I was expired by this article by David English on the Leica blog.
Aug 02, 2017 at 01:55 AM
p.1484 #16Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
joakim wrote:
p.s. anyone else not seeing these? Has FM changed the way it shares photos? I used to be able to just drop the . jpeg URL...I don't see them here but when I copied the url into a new window then I could see the image. The third one was my favourite
---------------------------------------------
Werner_Utsch wrote:
Ricardo, i don't see any of your pics ....
---------------------------------------------
lenticular11 wrote:
Same for me Ricardo - nothing visible
Nice IR photos Joakim, I didn't realise that the M246 had an IR capability.
Thanks folks... anything showing now? I just copied them into a new window and now they're rendering for me, but I appreciate this may only be showing for me. If not, I guess I'll have to contact my host at some point, as I am thinking them might be limiting hotlinking for some reason.
ricardovaste wrote
I'm not so "into" lenses like some people are, but I thought these really showed the qualities of the CV 35/1.4 SC in a particularly flattering way.p.s. anyone else not seeing these? Has FM changed the way it shares photos? I used to be able to just drop the . jpeg URL...
---------------------------------------------
Werner_Utsch wrote:
Ricardo, i don't see any of your pics ....
---------------------------------------------
lenticular11 wrote:
Same for me Ricardo - nothing visible
Nice IR photos Joakim, I didn't realise that the M246 had an IR capability.
Thanks folks... anything showing now? I just copied them into a new window and now they're rendering for me, but I appreciate this may only be showing for me. If not, I guess I'll have to contact my host at some point, as I am thinking them might be limiting hotlinking for some reason.
Aug 02, 2017 at 03:48 AM
p.1484 #17Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
ricardovaste wrote:
p.s. anyone else not seeing these? Has FM changed the way it shares photos? I used to be able to just drop the . jpeg URL...I don't see them here but when I copied the url into a new window then I could see the image. The third one was my favourite ---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
Nice IR photos Joakim, I didn't realise that the M246 had an IR capability.Thanks folks... anything showing now? I just copied them into a new window and now they're rendering for me, but I appreciate this may only be showing for me. If not, I guess I'll have to contact my host at some point, as I am thinking them might be limiting hotlinking for some reason.
Hi
Still nothing I'm afraid. I use Safari as my browser but I loaded this page in Firefox where I can open a console window that displays any errors and when clicking on one of your images I got the html error 403 Forbidden if that helps.
Maybe it's some kind of web Brexit
joakim wrote
ricardovaste wrote
I'm not so "into" lenses like some people are, but I thought these really showed the qualities of the CV 35/1.4 SC in a particularly flattering way.p.s. anyone else not seeing these? Has FM changed the way it shares photos? I used to be able to just drop the . jpeg URL...
Werner_Utsch wrote
Ricardo, i don't see any of your pics ....lenticular11 wrote
Same for me Ricardo - nothing visibleNice IR photos Joakim, I didn't realise that the M246 had an IR capability.
Hi
Still nothing I'm afraid. I use Safari as my browser but I loaded this page in Firefox where I can open a console window that displays any errors and when clicking on one of your images I got the html error 403 Forbidden if that helps.
Maybe it's some kind of web Brexit
Aug 02, 2017 at 04:13 AM
p.1484 #18Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
joakim wrote:
p.s. anyone else not seeing these? Has FM changed the way it shares photos? I used to be able to just drop the . jpeg URL...I don't see them here but when I copied the url into a new window then I could see the image. The third one was my favourite ---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
Nice IR photos Joakim, I didn't realise that the M246 had an IR capability.Thanks folks... anything showing now? I just copied them into a new window and now they're rendering for me, but I appreciate this may only be showing for me. If not, I guess I'll have to contact my host at some point, as I am thinking them might be limiting hotlinking for some reason.Hi
Still nothing I'm afraid. I use Safari as my browser but I loaded this page in Firefox where I can open a console window that displays any errors and when clicking on one of your images I got the html error 403 Forbidden if that helps.
Maybe it's some kind of web Brexit
MAYBE! Thanks for letting me know, I'll pass this info on. Sorry for the faff! Keep up the great works guys!
ricardovaste wrote
joakim wrote
ricardovaste wrote
I'm not so "into" lenses like some people are, but I thought these really showed the qualities of the CV 35/1.4 SC in a particularly flattering way.p.s. anyone else not seeing these? Has FM changed the way it shares photos? I used to be able to just drop the . jpeg URL...
Werner_Utsch wrote
Ricardo, i don't see any of your pics ....lenticular11 wrote
Same for me Ricardo - nothing visibleNice IR photos Joakim, I didn't realise that the M246 had an IR capability.
Still nothing I'm afraid. I use Safari as my browser but I loaded this page in Firefox where I can open a console window that displays any errors and when clicking on one of your images I got the html error 403 Forbidden if that helps.
Maybe it's some kind of web Brexit
MAYBE! Thanks for letting me know, I'll pass this info on. Sorry for the faff! Keep up the great works guys!Aug 02, 2017 at 04:21 AM
p.1484 #19Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
I've already posted these above: On LUF, several people liked the first one better. First, this is a restaurant called Da Conch Shack on Providenciales, an island in Turks & Caicos. The man in both pictures is the same waiter.
At first, when I examined in Lightroom the pictures shot that day, I instantaneously selected the second picture as the one to process, like selecting a frame from a contact sheet of a roll of 35mm film. After that I went on to process the first picture, which I liked less. However, when deciding which picture to post to my flickr site, I selected the first picture because I thought viewers would like it more because, overall, it's a pleasing composition in terms of balance, the top window not being cut off, and giving more of what people often call a "sense of place" — it is also a prettier scene: I'm using the word "prettier" intentionally here.
Nevertheless, I kept on looking at the second picture and continued to feel that it's a better photograph: a more dynamic composition, and I liked the oranges in the sand, at the bottom of the frame, against the blues in the image; but, most strikingly, I liked the gesture of the tree matching the gesture of the man, "gesture" in the sense of attitude, as in a "gesture drawing." For me, the second image says more and says it more forcefully — more meaning and more expression. In this sense, the chair in the left bottom foreground I see helpful rather than, as many might feel, unneeded.
Generally, my feeling is that, in judging images, our instantaneous first choice is, in most cases, likely to be the right one — the right one for ourselves, that is. Which picture do you prefer, and why?
M10 | Summaron-M f/5.6 28mm | ISO 200 | f/5.6 | 1/125 sec
M10 | Summaron-M f/5.6 28mm | ISO 200 | f/5.6 | 1/125 sec
Alone in Bangkok essay on BURN Magazine
Edited on Aug 02, 2017 at 07:12 AM · View previous versions
At first, when I examined in Lightroom the pictures shot that day, I instantaneously selected the second picture as the one to process, like selecting a frame from a contact sheet of a roll of 35mm film. After that I went on to process the first picture, which I liked less. However, when deciding which picture to post to my flickr site, I selected the first picture because I thought viewers would like it more because, overall, it's a pleasing composition in terms of balance, the top window not being cut off, and giving more of what people often call a "sense of place" — it is also a prettier scene: I'm using the word "prettier" intentionally here.
Nevertheless, I kept on looking at the second picture and continued to feel that it's a better photograph: a more dynamic composition, and I liked the oranges in the sand, at the bottom of the frame, against the blues in the image; but, most strikingly, I liked the gesture of the tree matching the gesture of the man, "gesture" in the sense of attitude, as in a "gesture drawing." For me, the second image says more and says it more forcefully — more meaning and more expression. In this sense, the chair in the left bottom foreground I see helpful rather than, as many might feel, unneeded.
Generally, my feeling is that, in judging images, our instantaneous first choice is, in most cases, likely to be the right one — the right one for ourselves, that is. Which picture do you prefer, and why?
M10 | Summaron-M f/5.6 28mm | ISO 200 | f/5.6 | 1/125 sec
M10 | Summaron-M f/5.6 28mm | ISO 200 | f/5.6 | 1/125 sec
Alone in Bangkok essay on BURN Magazine
Edited on Aug 02, 2017 at 07:12 AM · View previous versions
Aug 02, 2017 at 07:01 AM