Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
p.1465 #1Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
A few scans from my latest roll of Fuji Natura 1600.
M7-ZM 35/1.4-Natura 1600 by edward karaa, on Flickr
M7-ZM 50/2-Natura 1600 by edward karaa, on Flickr
M7-ZM 35/1.4-Natura 1600 by edward karaa, on Flickr
M7-ZM 35/1.4-Natura 1600 by edward karaa, on Flickr
M7-ZM 35/1.4-Natura 1600 by edward karaa, on Flickr
M7-ZM 35/1.4-Natura 1600 by edward karaa, on Flickr
M7-ZM 35/1.4-Natura 1600 by edward karaa, on Flickr
M7-ZM 35/1.4-Natura 1600 by edward karaa, on FlickrM7-ZM 50/2-Natura 1600 by edward karaa, on FlickrM7-ZM 35/1.4-Natura 1600 by edward karaa, on FlickrM7-ZM 35/1.4-Natura 1600 by edward karaa, on FlickrM7-ZM 35/1.4-Natura 1600 by edward karaa, on FlickrM7-ZM 35/1.4-Natura 1600 by edward karaa, on FlickrM7-ZM 35/1.4-Natura 1600 by edward karaa, on FlickrJun 21, 2017 at 06:21 AM
p.1465 #2Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
I have been in Hong Kong a couple of times per year for the last 10 years now, but I always end up returning to this spot. Breathtaking view and a great place for testing new lenses
Leica Super-Elmar 21 - Hong Kong
Edited on Jun 22, 2017 at 10:19 AM · View previous versions
Edited on Jun 22, 2017 at 10:19 AM · View previous versions
Jun 21, 2017 at 07:18 AM
p.1465 #3Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Val d'Orcia Morning by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
S006, Vario-Elmar S 30-90
Lee 150 soft grad filter 0.9
Ole and Edward, great !
Edited on Jun 21, 2017 at 07:33 AM · View previous versions
Jun 21, 2017 at 07:21 AM
p.1465 #4Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
OleAndre wrote:
I have been in Hong Kong a couple of times per year for the last 10 years now, but I always end up returning to this spot. Breathtaking view and a great place for testing new lenses
Spectacular! Next time I visit Hong Kong I might ask you to divulge that secret location
Jun 21, 2017 at 07:23 AM
p.1465 #5Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Werner_Utsch wrote:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4256/35032082112_08919ac112_h.jpg
Val d'Orcia Morning by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
S006, Vario-Elmar S 30-90
Lee 150 soft grad filter 0.9
Ole and Edward, great !
Thank you Werner!
Love your photos from Tuscany. You make these gorgeous shots almost look effortless.
Jun 21, 2017 at 07:40 AM
p.1465 #6Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
edwardkaraa wrote:
" Val d'Orcia Morning "
https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4256/35032082112_08919ac112_h.jpg
Val d'Orcia Morning by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
S006, Vario-Elmar S 30-90
Lee 150 soft grad filter 0.9
Ole and Edward, great !Thank you Werner!
Love your photos from Tuscany. You make these gorgeous shots almost look effortless.
Thx Edward
They were not !
Had to get up at 5am every morning (with NO coffee)....
Love your work on film, there is a partly exposed Porta 400 in my old M6, to wait is the hardest part
BTW tbe 006 did great in Tuscany ...... the 7RII for the longer lenses as well, but a Leica file is a Leica file
Werner_Utsch wrote
https://c1.staticflickr.com/5/4256/35032082112_08919ac112_h.jpg
Val d'Orcia Morning by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
S006, Vario-Elmar S 30-90
Lee 150 soft grad filter 0.9
Ole and Edward, great !
Love your photos from Tuscany. You make these gorgeous shots almost look effortless.
Thx Edward
They were not !
Had to get up at 5am every morning (with NO coffee)....
Love your work on film, there is a partly exposed Porta 400 in my old M6, to wait is the hardest part
BTW tbe 006 did great in Tuscany ...... the 7RII for the longer lenses as well, but a Leica file is a Leica file
Jun 21, 2017 at 07:46 AM
p.1465 #7Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Frankfurt, Germany 2017.
Jun 21, 2017 at 08:01 AM
p.1465 #8Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
adamdewilde wrote:
Hi Gary! I find Portra colors to be fantastic and the 800 version can be pushed two stops. The cinestill 800T can be useful if the light is predominantly incandescent, but even though it's related to Portra, the emulsion has no antihalation layer and there are too many scratches and impurities. Something to consider. In B/W you can't go wrong with any but my current favorite is Tmax400 and you can easily push it a couple of stops too.That sure help Edward! I was thinking of Portra and will give it a whirl - appreciate the info. As far as B&W - I'm afraid that I have fallen in love with Tri-X 400. I second Portra 400 and if you need to push then Portra 800. BUT I also like the look of CineStill 800T indoors with mixed lights and it's also good pushed two stops, and I personally prefer it over Portra 800 for indoor/pushing. BUT I wouldn't recommend it outdoors during the day, colours don't work for what I like to see colour wise. So if you need a bit more consistency I'd go Portra 400 during the day, Portra 800 at night pushed.
Black and white film is pretty easy, Tri-X and push
ARGH... I hate that you guys are...Show more →
Thanks Adam - appreciate the information!
Gary Clennan wrote
edwardkaraa wrote
Gary Clennan wrote
Looking for some advice on film. This year I am planning on shooting our annual (outdoor) exhibition mostly with film. I will have two bodies, one B&W and one color. Which film(s) do you think would be best for a ton of mixed lighting and low-light shooting? Think of a bunch of different rides/games/etc at dusk and into the night. I don't mind things a bit saturated in this case and am ok to push the film a few stops. I just want to try and avoid a color balance that is way off and needs a lot of PP. Advice?Black and white film is pretty easy, Tri-X and push
ARGH... I hate that you guys are...Show more →
Thanks Adam - appreciate the information!
Jun 21, 2017 at 08:03 AM
p.1465 #9Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
edwardkaraa wrote:
A few scans from my latest roll of Fuji Natura 1600.
Speaking of film, I like your Natura 1600 shots. Nice shots overall BTW. But about the film itself, I actually don't know how much editing of the colours you did on the computer (as they look great when you use the film).. But I find most Fuji film to be way to green. And in the case of Natura 1600 it's really finicky with exposures. You kinda have to get it spot on, or over exposed. Under exposing and the blacks go bad and needs a LOT of work on the computer afterwards (assuming you're scanning negs). I don't use Natura.
Your shots look good (from a purely film stock perspective), so I'm curious how much PP went into the shots. Maybe your Lab is better than mine
Again, great images overall film stock aside! I quite like the happy barber and the expression from the tailor.
A few scans from my latest roll of Fuji Natura 1600.
Speaking of film, I like your Natura 1600 shots. Nice shots overall BTW. But about the film itself, I actually don't know how much editing of the colours you did on the computer (as they look great when you use the film).. But I find most Fuji film to be way to green. And in the case of Natura 1600 it's really finicky with exposures. You kinda have to get it spot on, or over exposed. Under exposing and the blacks go bad and needs a LOT of work on the computer afterwards (assuming you're scanning negs). I don't use Natura.
Your shots look good (from a purely film stock perspective), so I'm curious how much PP went into the shots. Maybe your Lab is better than mine
Again, great images overall film stock aside! I quite like the happy barber and the expression from the tailor.
Jun 21, 2017 at 01:54 PM
p.1465 #10Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
adamdewilde wrote:
edwardkaraa wrote
A few scans from my latest roll of Fuji Natura 1600.Thank you very much Adam!
The Natura 1600 to my eyes is surprisingly fine grained, and for sure has a very low contrast. I don't know how finicky it is about underexposure, I did get two unusable shots in this roll but I'm sure they were underexposed by at least 2 stops. Speaking of labs, I found that I get better results with my new scanner (primefilm XE) and silverfast software (included) than the best local pro labs. The software has a negative scanning app with film profiles for most common emulsions. I only adjust contrast and exposure, and select between auto or no auto color. I did notice Natura required more contrast boost than with other films, and the colors are more muted but I didn't change that since I religiously don't mess with film color
Jun 21, 2017 at 08:52 PM
|
p.1465 #11Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
edwardkaraa wrote:
Speaking of film, I like your Natura 1600 shots. Nice shots overall BTW. But about the film itself, I actually don't know how much editing of the colours you did on the computer (as they look great when you use the film).. But I find most Fuji film to be way to green. And in the case of Natura 1600 it's really finicky with exposures. You kinda have to get it spot on, or over exposed. Under exposing and the blacks go bad and needs a LOT of work on the computer afterwards (assuming you're scanning negs). I don't use Natura.
Your shots look good (from a purely film stock perspective), so I'm curious how much PP went into the shots. Maybe your Lab is better than mine
Again, great images overall film stock aside! I quite like the happy barber and the expression from the tailor.Thank you very much Adam!
The Natura 1600 to my eyes is surprisingly fine grained, and for sure has a very low contrast. I don't know how finicky it is about underexposure, I did get two unusable shots in this roll but I'm sure they were underexposed by at least 2 stops. Speaking of labs, I found that I get better results with my new scanner (primefilm XE) and silverfast software (included) than the best local pro labs. The software has a negative scanning app with film profiles for most common emulsions. I only adjust contrast and exposure, and select...Show more →
Interesting.. Maybe the scanner's colour algorithms kinda compensated for the colours of the film.
primefilm XE I'll look it up. I've had a few scanners over the years. To be honest here in Singapore I think the labs just use dirty chemicals. I doubt their maintenance is up to the same standards as the bigger labs here in L.A.
I spent the one hour ride home from dinner tonight talking to my wife about how I'm considering a M-A... She still thinks it's a bad idea, so much so she tried to deviate the conversation to when I would buy an M10. And when that didn't work, if I would be willing to buy more Profoto B1 lights here in LA (mine are in SG) to replicate a photoshoot that Dior did in the desert w/lighting at sunset. And this is coming from a girl who would ONLY shoot film if she could find the time. And BTW hates when I fiddle with studio/on location lighting. hahaha I think she knows I'll never use the M-A.
adamdewilde wrote
edwardkaraa wrote
A few scans from my latest roll of Fuji Natura 1600.Your shots look good (from a purely film stock perspective), so I'm curious how much PP went into the shots. Maybe your Lab is better than mine
Again, great images overall film stock aside! I quite like the happy barber and the expression from the tailor.
The Natura 1600 to my eyes is surprisingly fine grained, and for sure has a very low contrast. I don't know how finicky it is about underexposure, I did get two unusable shots in this roll but I'm sure they were underexposed by at least 2 stops. Speaking of labs, I found that I get better results with my new scanner (primefilm XE) and silverfast software (included) than the best local pro labs. The software has a negative scanning app with film profiles for most common emulsions. I only adjust contrast and exposure, and select...Show more →
Interesting.. Maybe the scanner's colour algorithms kinda compensated for the colours of the film.
primefilm XE I'll look it up. I've had a few scanners over the years. To be honest here in Singapore I think the labs just use dirty chemicals. I doubt their maintenance is up to the same standards as the bigger labs here in L.A.
I spent the one hour ride home from dinner tonight talking to my wife about how I'm considering a M-A... She still thinks it's a bad idea, so much so she tried to deviate the conversation to when I would buy an M10. And when that didn't work, if I would be willing to buy more Profoto B1 lights here in LA (mine are in SG) to replicate a photoshoot that Dior did in the desert w/lighting at sunset. And this is coming from a girl who would ONLY shoot film if she could find the time. And BTW hates when I fiddle with studio/on location lighting. hahaha I think she knows I'll never use the M-A.
Jun 22, 2017 at 02:32 AM
p.1465 #12Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
adamdewilde wrote:
Speaking of film, I like your Natura 1600 shots. Nice shots overall BTW. But about the film itself, I actually don't know how much editing of the colours you did on the computer (as they look great when you use the film).. But I find most Fuji film to be way to green. And in the case of Natura 1600 it's really finicky with exposures. You kinda have to get it spot on, or over exposed. Under exposing and the blacks go bad and needs a LOT of work on the computer afterwards (assuming you're scanning negs). I don't use Natura.
Your shots look good (from a purely film stock perspective), so I'm curious how much PP went into the shots. Maybe your Lab is better than mine
Again, great images overall film stock aside! I quite like the happy barber and the expression from the tailor.Thank you very much Adam!
The Natura 1600 to my eyes is surprisingly fine grained, and for sure has a very low contrast. I don't know how finicky it is about underexposure, I did get two unusable shots in this roll but I'm sure they were underexposed by at least 2 stops. Speaking of labs, I found that I get better results with my new scanner (primefilm XE) and silverfast software (included) than the best local pro labs. The software has a negative scanning app with film profiles for most common emulsions. I only adjust contrast and exposure, and select between auto or no auto color. I did notice Natura required more contrast boost than with other films, and the colors are more muted but I didn't change that since I religiously don't mess with film colorInteresting.. Maybe the scanner's colour algorithms kinda compensated for the colours of the film.
primefilm XE I'll look it up. I've had a few scanners over the years. To be honest here in Singapore I think the labs just use dirty chemicals. I doubt their maintenance is up to the same standards as the bigger labs here in L.A.
I spent the one hour ride home from dinner tonight talking to my wife about how I'm considering a M-A... She still thinks it's a bad idea, so much so she tried to deviate the conversation to when I would buy an M10....Show more →
To be honest, shooting film is not something I would recommend to anyone. It's a very personal choice, and in our days, quite an anachronism. I personally made the switch because it's a medium I enjoy working with, and because I have no obligations whatsoever to produce fast and consistent results. I have to confess though that I'm very pleased with the results
edwardkaraa wrote
adamdewilde wrote
edwardkaraa wrote
A few scans from my latest roll of Fuji Natura 1600.Your shots look good (from a purely film stock perspective), so I'm curious how much PP went into the shots. Maybe your Lab is better than mine
Again, great images overall film stock aside! I quite like the happy barber and the expression from the tailor.
The Natura 1600 to my eyes is surprisingly fine grained, and for sure has a very low contrast. I don't know how finicky it is about underexposure, I did get two unusable shots in this roll but I'm sure they were underexposed by at least 2 stops. Speaking of labs, I found that I get better results with my new scanner (primefilm XE) and silverfast software (included) than the best local pro labs. The software has a negative scanning app with film profiles for most common emulsions. I only adjust contrast and exposure, and select between auto or no auto color. I did notice Natura required more contrast boost than with other films, and the colors are more muted but I didn't change that since I religiously don't mess with film color
primefilm XE I'll look it up. I've had a few scanners over the years. To be honest here in Singapore I think the labs just use dirty chemicals. I doubt their maintenance is up to the same standards as the bigger labs here in L.A.
I spent the one hour ride home from dinner tonight talking to my wife about how I'm considering a M-A... She still thinks it's a bad idea, so much so she tried to deviate the conversation to when I would buy an M10....Show more →
To be honest, shooting film is not something I would recommend to anyone. It's a very personal choice, and in our days, quite an anachronism. I personally made the switch because it's a medium I enjoy working with, and because I have no obligations whatsoever to produce fast and consistent results. I have to confess though that I'm very pleased with the results
Jun 22, 2017 at 03:11 AM
p.1465 #13Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Werner_Utsch wrote:
Ole and Edward, great !
Thank you Werner And the same to you, your photos from Tuscany are gorgeous!
---------------------------------------------
edwardkaraa wrote:
Spectacular! Next time I visit Hong Kong I might ask you to divulge that secret location
Feel free to do so Edward I have a long list of photo locations that are worth visiting
Ole and Edward, great !
Thank you Werner
And the same to you, your photos from Tuscany are gorgeous!---------------------------------------------
edwardkaraa wrote:
Spectacular! Next time I visit Hong Kong I might ask you to divulge that secret location
Feel free to do so Edward
I have a long list of photo locations that are worth visitingJun 22, 2017 at 04:05 AM
p.1465 #14Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Bridge by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
Monochrom, Elmarit M 28/2.8 asph.
Jun 22, 2017 at 04:33 AM
p.1465 #15Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
edwardkaraa wrote:
Speaking of film, I like your Natura 1600 shots. Nice shots overall BTW. But about the film itself, I actually don't know how much editing of the colours you did on the computer (as they look great when you use the film).. But I find most Fuji film to be way to green. And in the case of Natura 1600 it's really finicky with exposures. You kinda have to get it spot on, or over exposed. Under exposing and the blacks go bad and needs a LOT of work on the computer afterwards (assuming you're scanning negs). I don't use Natura.
Your shots look good (from a purely film stock perspective), so I'm curious how much PP went into the shots. Maybe your Lab is better than mine
Again, great images overall film stock aside! I quite like the happy barber and the expression from the tailor.Thank you very much Adam!
The Natura 1600 to my eyes is surprisingly fine grained, and for sure has a very low contrast. I don't know how finicky it is about underexposure, I did get two unusable shots in this roll but I'm sure they were underexposed by at least 2 stops. Speaking of labs, I found that I get better results with my new scanner (primefilm XE) and silverfast software (included) than the best local pro labs. The software has a negative scanning app with film profiles for most common emulsions. I only adjust contrast and exposure, and select between auto or no auto color. I did notice Natura required more contrast boost than with other films, and the colors are more muted but I didn't change that since I religiously don't mess with film colorInteresting.. Maybe the scanner's colour algorithms kinda compensated for the colours of the film.
primefilm XE I'll look it up. I've had a few scanners over the years. To be honest here in Singapore I think the labs just use dirty chemicals. I doubt their maintenance is up to the same standards as the bigger labs here in L.A.
I spent the one hour ride home from dinner tonight talking to my wife about how I'm considering a M-A... She still thinks it's a bad idea, so much so she tried to deviate the conversation to when I would buy an M10. And when that didn't work, if I would be willing to buy more Profoto B1 lights here in LA (mine are in SG) to replicate a photoshoot that Dior did in the desert w/lighting at sunset. And this is coming from a girl who would ONLY shoot film if she could find the time. And BTW hates when I fiddle with studio/on location lighting. hahaha I think she knows I'll never use the M-A.To be honest, shooting film is not something I would recommend to anyone. It's a very personal choice, and in our days, quite an anachronism. I personally made the switch because it's a medium I enjoy working with, and because I have no obligations whatsoever to produce fast and consistent results. I have to confess though that I'm very pleased with the results
Yeah, I have tons of film cameras that I just don't use anymore (not like before, but still enough film gear).. Truth be told, I think the few clients a year who request film really ruin it for me as far as "having fun" is concern.
I barely used my M7 the whole time I owned it. Pretty much because I remember I had just shoot a wedding on film not a month after buying the M7 and it made the camera kinda feel like a burden to use (Mind you I used a Contax645 kit - now I only have one C645 kit left so if I get wedding requests it's C645 + EOS3).
But I love the romantic intent.. And I love seeing you guys shoot film. Really does inspire me to want to buy an M-A (besides they look sexy).
adamdewilde wrote
edwardkaraa wrote
adamdewilde wrote
edwardkaraa wrote
A few scans from my latest roll of Fuji Natura 1600.Your shots look good (from a purely film stock perspective), so I'm curious how much PP went into the shots. Maybe your Lab is better than mine
Again, great images overall film stock aside! I quite like the happy barber and the expression from the tailor.
The Natura 1600 to my eyes is surprisingly fine grained, and for sure has a very low contrast. I don't know how finicky it is about underexposure, I did get two unusable shots in this roll but I'm sure they were underexposed by at least 2 stops. Speaking of labs, I found that I get better results with my new scanner (primefilm XE) and silverfast software (included) than the best local pro labs. The software has a negative scanning app with film profiles for most common emulsions. I only adjust contrast and exposure, and select between auto or no auto color. I did notice Natura required more contrast boost than with other films, and the colors are more muted but I didn't change that since I religiously don't mess with film color
primefilm XE I'll look it up. I've had a few scanners over the years. To be honest here in Singapore I think the labs just use dirty chemicals. I doubt their maintenance is up to the same standards as the bigger labs here in L.A.
I spent the one hour ride home from dinner tonight talking to my wife about how I'm considering a M-A... She still thinks it's a bad idea, so much so she tried to deviate the conversation to when I would buy an M10. And when that didn't work, if I would be willing to buy more Profoto B1 lights here in LA (mine are in SG) to replicate a photoshoot that Dior did in the desert w/lighting at sunset. And this is coming from a girl who would ONLY shoot film if she could find the time. And BTW hates when I fiddle with studio/on location lighting. hahaha I think she knows I'll never use the M-A.
Yeah, I have tons of film cameras that I just don't use anymore (not like before, but still enough film gear).. Truth be told, I think the few clients a year who request film really ruin it for me as far as "having fun" is concern.
I barely used my M7 the whole time I owned it. Pretty much because I remember I had just shoot a wedding on film not a month after buying the M7 and it made the camera kinda feel like a burden to use (Mind you I used a Contax645 kit - now I only have one C645 kit left so if I get wedding requests it's C645 + EOS3).
But I love the romantic intent.. And I love seeing you guys shoot film. Really does inspire me to want to buy an M-A (besides they look sexy).
Jun 22, 2017 at 05:23 AM
p.1465 #16Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
Sunny today, so i took the M3 out to Choi Hon Public Housing Estate. Really nice place for photography, with lots of life and beautiful colours. Film was Kodak Portra 400.
Leica M3 | Leica Summilux 50/1.4 Asph | Choi Hon Estate
Leica M3 | Leica Summilux 50/1.4 Asph | Choi Hon Estate
Leica M3 | Leica Summilux 50/1.4 Asph | Choi Hon Estate
Leica M3 | Leica Summilux 50/1.4 Asph | Choi Hon Estate
Leica M3 | Leica Summilux 50/1.4 Asph | Choi Hon Estate
Jun 22, 2017 at 05:27 AM
p.1465 #17Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
The Way Back To Pienza by Werner Utsch, on Flickr
S006, Apo-Elmar S 180/3.5
Soft HDR 2 shots
Jun 22, 2017 at 05:35 AM
p.1465 #18Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
adamdewilde wrote:
edwardkaraa wrote
adamdewilde wrote
edwardkaraa wrote
adamdewilde wrote
edwardkaraa wrote
A few scans from my latest roll of Fuji Natura 1600.Your shots look good (from a purely film stock perspective), so I'm curious how much PP went into the shots. Maybe your Lab is better than mine
Again, great images overall film stock aside! I quite like the happy barber and the expression from the tailor.
The Natura 1600 to my eyes is surprisingly fine grained, and for sure has a very low contrast. I don't know how finicky it is about underexposure, I did get two unusable shots in this roll but I'm sure they were underexposed by at least 2 stops. Speaking of labs, I found that I get better results with my new scanner (primefilm XE) and silverfast software (included) than the best local pro labs. The software has a negative scanning app with film profiles for most common emulsions. I only adjust contrast and exposure, and select between auto or no auto color. I did notice Natura required more contrast boost than with other films, and the colors are more muted but I didn't change that since I religiously don't mess with film color
primefilm XE I'll look it up. I've had a few scanners over the years. To be honest here in Singapore I think the labs just use dirty chemicals. I doubt their maintenance is up to the same standards as the bigger labs here in L.A.
I spent the one hour ride home from dinner tonight talking to my wife about how I'm considering a M-A... She still thinks it's a bad idea, so much so she tried to deviate the conversation to when I would buy an M10. And when that didn't work, if I would be willing to buy more Profoto B1 lights here in LA (mine are in SG) to replicate a photoshoot that Dior did in the desert w/lighting at sunset. And this is coming from a girl who would ONLY shoot film if she could find the time. And BTW hates when I fiddle with studio/on location lighting. hahaha I think she knows I'll never use the M-A.
I barely used my M7 the whole time I owned it. Pretty much because I remember I had just shoot a wedding on film not a month after buying the M7 and it made the camera kinda feel like a burden to use (Mind you I used a Contax645 kit - now I only have...Show more →
Go ahead Adam! Used M7 are so cheap and you can sell them without loss in case you change your mind
Jun 22, 2017 at 05:49 AM
p.1465 #19Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
OleAndre wrote:
Sunny today, so i took the M3 out to Choi Hon Public Housing Estate. Really nice place for photography, with lots of life and beautiful colours. Film was Kodak Portra 400.
Lovely Portra colors! Well done Ole!
Jun 22, 2017 at 05:59 AM
p.1465 #20Leica M/X/T/S/Q/CL/SL Picture Thread
edwardkaraa wrote:
Lovely Portra colors! Well done Ole!
Thanks Edward
Lovely Portra colors! Well done Ole!
Thanks Edward
Jun 22, 2017 at 10:21 AM