Gary Clennan wrote: uhoh7 wroteGary, is it my imagination, or are you going for the "M10 look" in the first 3?
They are excellent, but I have to say the colors really remind me alot of you know what
Maybe it's just rubbing off?
Or you are thinking, hey my 240 can do that, no problem. Maybe? Problem is that I'm not really sure what the M10's signature look is.... Not sure what the colors remind you of but the first three I'm not happy with the WB at all really. Just didn't feel like spending too much time in post. No intentional processing on this set though - just that funky color tint/cast/wb I couldn't seem to correct.... I never try to duplicate another sensors output and just try to make the image look pleasing to me.
I've been watching the M10 images alot as they start to appear. People of course are editing them this way and that. But that particular color saturation in the flatter light which I see in those has popped up in early shots from a bunch of different people.
Then I looked at the latest today on flickr and none are that way !
Anyway, I was just curious. WB is a funny thing. Some shots it's fine or takes just a small tweak, others I can never get right, to my taste.
Is there a M10 Look? Well at the heart, there has to be. M9 and and 240 can be edited close, but we all know there is a difference at the base. M10 is very different sensor to 240. So base must be different also. The final product will be slightly unique in all three, though so many variables, you will have a hard time say what was the starting point, as with M9/ 240 at times.
I've been too busy lately to shoot or post much, but I had a couple of hours to kill today while my wife was writing an exam at the local university. Using the MM and my new lens, a 50 Summilux pre-ASPH.
First two with my newly returned M9 & 21/2.8 Asph, then the last with MM1 & 35 FLE. Having two bodies again makes me feel ready to tackle the entire world.